Current Disappearance of 3yo William Tyrrell Pt 2 * FM guilty of assault & intimidation

Remove this Banner Ad

Continued from PART 1

Criminal charges the former foster parents currently face as at 15 April 2022 include:
  • Apprehended Violence Orders on both (AVOs)
  • Lying to the NSW Crime Commission on former foster mother *Not Guilty
  • Lying to the NSW Crime Commission on former foster father *Not Guilty
  • 2 x charges of assault against a child on former foster mother *Guilty
  • 1 x charge of assault against a child on former foster father *Not Guilty
  • Stalking &/or Intimidation on both *Guilty
  • Dummy bidding real estate fraud *Guilty
TIMELINE

Where's William Tyrrell? - The Ch 10 podcast (under Coroner's subpoena)

Operation Arkstone
 
Last edited:

Whilst this link doesn't offer the sorts of explanations I need it does show images on the road of what I saw with multiple shadows opposite direction in overcast conditions. It is a real phenomenon

We therefore need to exercise caution in advocating clear cut conclusions from shadow analysis on the verandah.

The light is diffused from cloud cover. It is diffused also from polycarbonate roofing AND there is reflective lighting from the wall perhaps from that more direct but still diffused light source which possibly influences light source onto that verandah..

I'm sorry but I have to say we can't tell direction from what we observe on that verandah. it's not a smoking gun imo. indeed I'm more inclined to think the directions are all muddied by multiple diffusions, protons scattered through cloud layers creating multiple directions of light some of which may have found their reflection from wall onto that verandah creating an impression of accurate direction which simply may not be possible in cloudy skies
 
Last edited:

Whilst this link doesn't offer the sorts of explanations I need it does show images on the road of what I saw with multiple shadows opposite direction in overcast conditions. It is a real phenomenon

We therefore need to exercise caution in advocating clear cut conclusions from shadow analysis on the verandah.

The light is diffused from cloud cover. It is diffused also from polycarbonate roofing AND there is reflective lighting from the wall perhaps from that more direct but still diffused light source which possibly influences light source onto that verandah..

I'm sorry but I have to say we can't tell direction from what we observe on that verandah. it's not a smoking gun imo. indeed I'm more inclined to think the directions are all muddied by multiple diffusions, protons scattered through cloud layers creating multiple directions of light some of which may have found their reflection from wall onto that verandah creating an impression of accurate direction which simply may not be possible in cloudy skies
Given the shadows are only coming off the sides of the truck on the road, what was the colour of the truck sides? The responses talk about secondary light sources (bright cloud).
 
Given the shadows are only coming off the sides of the truck on the road, what was the colour of the truck sides? The responses talk about secondary light sources (bright cloud).

What I experienced yesterday was for about 15 minutes drive EVERY vehicle exhibiting the same phenomenon with each. So perhaps 40 vehicles. No unnatural light source anywhere

The theory I understand is that as protons make their way down through the clouds layers they are reflected around in different directions and it causes the light that hits the opaque object to do so from multiple directions to suffer this phenomenon of multiple softer shadows in multiple directions. Still looking for a science paper
 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this ad.

Given the shadows are only coming off the sides of the truck on the road, what was the colour of the truck sides? The responses talk about secondary light sources (bright cloud).

It doesn't necessarily disprove your conclusions. But I think more work is definately required before we accept that is the direction and photos can't have been that day.

In particular, because we now understand better diffusion and reflection I'm highly suspicious of the wall showing strong reflective light. It's entirely possible that reflection off that wall from diffused sun in those overcast conditions created the light source influencing shadow.

I theorise that when an object is stationary in these circumstances there will be a soft aura of shadow around them all directions ..when an object is moving the direction dissipates the shadow front/ back so it can no longer be seen but shadows remain to each side..theory.
 
Last edited:
The problem is there’s not enough foster carers for the amount of children who go into care and the agencies are under resourced. Some officers have had a caseload of up to 50 families at one time. It’s unacceptable.
That is NO excuse for placing children in the same environment . Full stop.
 
If the foster mother is innocent and she had nothing to do with the disappearance of William Tyrrell, why hasn’t she sued the NSW Police for defamation?

Why isn’t she trying to defend her reputation if the suggestions the police have made about her since late 2021 are untrue?
 
We don't know the trip was only 1.3km. She had time to go much further, and in any direction, probably any time between 10am and 10:30am.
Note that police came from Kendall and took only 10 minutes to get there.
You can drive from Port Macquarie to Kendall in that time. Remember it was discussed about the Bali trip
 
This maybe off thread but 'blame it on the baby bonus'. There was a big increase in births but not in well functioning families. This has lead to not only large numbers of children in care, but an increase juvenile crime years after their birth. There is a very good book called 'Freakanomics' that largely predicts this would be the case.
That argument is not applicable in this case, imho as the biological mother has gone on to have four more children after William and L, and there’s definitely no baby bonus on offer anymore. She would have had William and L anyway, regardless of a baby bonus.
 
That argument is not applicable in this case, imho as the biological mother has gone on to have four more children after William and L, and there’s definitely no baby bonus on offer anymore. She would have had William and L anyway, regardless of a baby bonus.
Exactly!
 
It doesn't necessarily disprove your conclusions. But I think more work is definately required before we accept that is the direction and photos can't have been that day.

In particular, because we now understand better diffusion and reflection I'm highly suspicious of the wall showing strong reflective light. It's entirely possible that reflection off that wall from diffused sun in those overcast conditions created the light source influencing shadow.

I theorise that when an object is stationary in these circumstances there will be a soft aura of shadow around them all directions ..when an object is moving the direction dissipates the shadow front/ back so it can no longer be seen but shadows remain to each side..theory.

Shadows are funny things as you say, sometimes it is hard to explain. We can see the moon at night because it reflects the sun's rays. It also reflects the sun's rays when it is visible during the day. I wonder how it affects shadows?

"We sometimes see the daytime moon for the same reason we see it at night — it is reflecting light from the sun — and its closeness to Earth makes it brighter than the daytime or nighttime sky. After the sun, the moon is by far the brightest celestial object we can see."
 
The trip from Port is 25 minutes taking the Lake Cathie way. Strange when the FF was interviewed he said he went to Lake Cathie not Lakewood.
Odd he was so devoted to William he did not know how tall he was.
Odd he was so devoted to William he did not know if he could get back up when he tipped backward on the stool.
I think William spent a lot of time in his special play room.
Was William used to amusing himself and just did what was the norm on the day of the disappearance?
I return to the fact where was his toys? The FGM was fed up with him look at the comments about him. Then why not let him play with his toys on the patio?
A little three year old would not see the significance in making a card for a dead relative. Why couldn’t he have just said miss you at the cemetery? Who was that for? IMO I think FM was at breaking point with William that day she wanted to adopt FGM was probably wondering why and FM had to prove he was worth it. I think FM took William for a little talk. I think William was not in the frame of mind to look at his behaviour. I wonder how FM was going to handle that?
 
Kendall to Lorne is 11 minutes I think FM went a little further than Cobb.
That is why she saw a truck.
How many of you have experienced a truck pull up and thank you? If you pull over they thunder by and if you are lucky they wave. There is just too many things that cause doubt.
I really tried to give them the benefit of doubt but when they hired a firm to look after their image yea - na!
 
I think you are all trying to explain AVERTED VISION it is a method astronomers use. I have a 10” scope we use AVERTED VISION. Our amateur group do astronomy nights it is difficult to explain why and how you do it.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

That is NO excuse for placing children in the same environment . Full stop.
Of course not. It’s more reference to a complex and maybe broken system, which is evident from from very young children living in hotel rooms with 24/7 supervision because there’s more children under care than foster parents.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Current Disappearance of 3yo William Tyrrell Pt 2 * FM guilty of assault & intimidation

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top