Current Disappearance of 3yo William Tyrrell Pt 2 * FM guilty of assault & intimidation

Remove this Banner Ad

Continued from PART 1

Criminal charges the former foster parents currently face as at 15 April 2022 include:
  • Apprehended Violence Orders on both (AVOs)
  • Lying to the NSW Crime Commission on former foster mother *Not Guilty
  • Lying to the NSW Crime Commission on former foster father *Not Guilty
  • 2 x charges of assault against a child on former foster mother *Guilty
  • 1 x charge of assault against a child on former foster father *Not Guilty
  • Stalking &/or Intimidation on both *Guilty
  • Dummy bidding real estate fraud *Guilty
TIMELINE

Where's William Tyrrell? - The Ch 10 podcast (under Coroner's subpoena)

Operation Arkstone
 
Last edited:
I’m not sure if this is well known, but a foster carer only has to provide a safe and secure home for a foster child. Single people can foster a child and as long as they can provide for the child and they meet other eligibility requirements such as age, blue card, etc can foster. This is why they also get paid.
Thanks for that
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Let’s stay on track the purpose of this thread is William, who was cared for by the fosters for only two years 8 months minus time spent at day care.
 
It would be obvious to even the most imbecilic that it's implied by the first post you quoted.
Including all the rich in Sydney that get rich due to criminal or fraudulent activities?

Do you count them as successful as long as they don't ever get caught, charged and/or successfully prosecuted?
 
Translated, that possibly means something like

I know I lied, and I lied because I felt persecuted.
I'm more important than any of you, but I'm not going to actually incriminate myself by spelling it out.
And I've been advised to say
I don’t know why I said that”, if I'm every caught out lying or contradicting myself by/to law enforcement or prosecutors.
Perfect. And great legal advice really, isn’t it.
 
What if FM was covering up being negligent, eg put William around the corner and told him to stay there until Dad got home. William ran down the lawn and someone was walking past or someone drove around the front of the house, saw him, did a u turn back around the corner and coaxed him in the car?
I wonder if she locked William outside as punishment for his behaviour, then William got so upset / fed up that he decided to go down the road to ‘find daddy’ (which were L’s words).

L may have continued to happily draw on the patio - the suggestion of them both playing ‘hide & seek’ came in later imo - originally it was just William off roaring like a tiger (possibly crying hysterically)

Quite some time could go by with the 2 women inside, making tea & chatting in the peace & quiet, L visible on the patio via the door .

I can imagine FM eventually coming out & calling William - no answer; goes around the corner / around the house exterior, no sign of him.

And maybe FF frantic race off in search was because FM told him what happened …. (Maybe also why she took off in the car previously)

I don’t think there’s any way that they would admit to this though because it would blow the whole ‘perfect’ parent idea that she’s built. … but a negligence case would be far better to answer than a murder case imo.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Current Disappearance of 3yo William Tyrrell Pt 2 * FM guilty of assault & intimidation

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top