Current Disappearance of 3yo William Tyrrell Pt 2 * FM guilty of assault & intimidation

Remove this Banner Ad

Continued from PART 1

Criminal charges the former foster parents currently face as at 15 April 2022 include:
  • Apprehended Violence Orders on both (AVOs)
  • Lying to the NSW Crime Commission on former foster mother *Not Guilty
  • Lying to the NSW Crime Commission on former foster father *Not Guilty
  • 2 x charges of assault against a child on former foster mother *Guilty
  • 1 x charge of assault against a child on former foster father *Not Guilty
  • Stalking &/or Intimidation on both *Guilty
  • Dummy bidding real estate fraud *Guilty
TIMELINE

Where's William Tyrrell? - The Ch 10 podcast (under Coroner's subpoena)

Operation Arkstone
 
Last edited:
TCP I have to give it to you about the photos you are truely tenacious. I don’t know if I could do it but remember “insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results” Brown and Einstein. I feel like I’m living in a particle collider. Everyone is going to stick to their beliefs no use looking for a different result.
If TCP is correct about the photos, we are looking at the most diabolical criminal conspiracy ever perpetuated on the Australian public. Possibly the world.
 
If TCP is correct about the photos, we are looking at the most diabolical criminal conspiracy ever perpetuated on the Australian public. Possibly the world.
na cannot happen as I said Male carer’s statement of his movements on the 12th however Female Carer could have thought it up over tea that is why two fingers worth is missing 🤣
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Bit of bias about the FF there Wallce. Knock off his halo. IMO of course.
So, here’s the thing. When I first started looking at the case, I really thought yeah he’s involved somehow. And then I spent time in court observing them, being around them, listening to the court matters in front of them, seeing how they responded to things said in court and evidence being presented - and I really got a creepy feeling.

I can’t explain it but I felt like I knew who the person was who was responsible for W disappearance.

And I don’t think it is the FF.

I’ve made an attempt to research the case, to get all of the facts - and to try as much as I could to get a sense of who the foster parents are, not just on any day but on their worst days.

I think the FF is cranky, he’s angry, he’s a bit of a grump - but I don’t think he’s involved at all with William’s disappearance and there’s never been talk of charges on him related to William.

The thing that makes the most sense to me is if the foster mother has done something she shouldn’t have, like moved William’s body, like not calling 000 at the appropriate time, then he’s not “in the know” about what she’s done. And neither are the other 9 close members of her family.
 
If William went over the balcony, the FM probably would have driven in to where he landed. That's possibly why the vehicle was heard by the Crabbes, she'd have to have gone over the gravel which can be crunchy enough to be alert to a vehicle turning.

There's two driveways, one is gravel.
 
He also said that in the search for William after his disappearance - with police, fire fighters, cadaver dogs, chainsaws and hydraulic equipment – meant that the little boy had not simply just been lost in the search area.

'William under his own steam could not travel beyond the area of the intensive search,' he said.

'The conclusion there must have been human intervention.

'It's beyond argument that no eye eyewitness can provide an account about how he left the boundaries of 48 Benaroon Drive.'





https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...er-mother-responded-point-blank-question.html

IMO: That whole search was to exclude the possibility that William had wandered off into the bush.

It was an “exclude this” theory search. Now we know he was taken.

Someone put him in a car or a vehicle and took him off the property.
 
Last edited:
So, here’s the thing. When I first started looking at the case, I really thought yeah he’s involved somehow. And then I spent time in court observing them, being around them, listening to the court matters in front of them, seeing how they responded to things said in court and evidence being presented - and I really got a creepy feeling.

I can’t explain it but I felt like I knew who the person was who was responsible for W disappearance.

And I don’t think it is the FF.

I’ve made an attempt to research the case, to get all of the facts - and to try as much as I could to get a sense of who the foster parents are, not just on any day but on their worst days.

I think the FF is cranky, he’s angry, he’s a bit of a grump - but I don’t think he’s involved at all with William’s disappearance and there’s never been talk of charges on him related to William.

The thing that makes the most sense to me is if the foster mother has done something she shouldn’t have, like moved William’s body, like not calling 000 at the appropriate time, then he’s not “in the know” about what she’s done. And neither are the other 9 close members of her family.
So the wicked witch, evil step mother, shades of Cinderella. Where was Cinderella's Dad, looking the other way. Lindy Chamberlain - the outcry against her. Poor Michael was just protecting her, don't send Michael to jail. I do not know, or have ever observed any of these people, so have no preconceived ideas.

Did FF not see that William had a possible DV black eye. (Plus a possible previous black eye in that older photo). William was allegedly underfed, due to neglect or punishment. Where was the FF. His strict regime may not have been improving William's behaviour. IMO it could have been the FF that was resistant to taking on adoption of William, IMO.
 
So the wicked witch, evil step mother, shades of Cinderella. Where was Cinderella's Dad, looking the other way. Lindy Chamberlain - the outcry against her. Poor Michael was just protecting her, don't send Michael to jail. I do not know, or have ever observed any of these people, so have no preconceived ideas.

Did FF not see that William had a possible DV black eye. (Plus a possible previous black eye in that older photo). William was allegedly underfed, due to neglect or punishment. Where was the FF. His strict regime may not have been improving William's behaviour. IMO it could have been the FF that was resistant to taking on adoption of William, IMO.
I remember the black eye in that photo, the day he went missing the bio mother was on FB saying it was a daycare injury. If it was, it would have been documented by the centre and if so that's probably why its never really been mentioned since it very first happened.
 
I remember the black eye in that photo, the day he went missing the bio mother was on FB saying it was a daycare injury. If it was, it would have been documented by the centre and if so that's probably why its never really been mentioned since it very first happened.

She said it happened at daycare?

It's mentioned a few times in this thread he was playing on her knee on the couch and hit his head on the coffee table.

Can anybody else remember this?
 
She said it happened at daycare?

It's mentioned a few times in this thread he was playing on her knee on the couch and hit his head on the coffee table.

Can anybody else remember this?
The photos were daycare photos. Like each year some daycare centres do individual photos at daycare.

The injury was documented as a fall from her <SD> lap, or her knee and William was assessed at the local hospital after that injury. The injury occurred in the Sydney home where he lived.

He had a hematoma from that injury, but his placement with the FF and FM continued.

Dan Box covered that part well in Witness but I can’t remember which episode.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

So the wicked witch, evil step mother, shades of Cinderella. Where was Cinderella's Dad, looking the other way. Lindy Chamberlain - the outcry against her. Poor Michael was just protecting her, don't send Michael to jail. I do not know, or have ever observed any of these people, so have no preconceived ideas.

Did FF not see that William had a possible DV black eye. (Plus a possible previous black eye in that older photo). William was allegedly underfed, due to neglect or punishment. Where was the FF. His strict regime may not have been improving William's behaviour. IMO it could have been the FF that was resistant to taking on adoption of William, IMO.
All the happy videos in the media of William are with his FF. They look happy together. I haven’t seen any videos of the FM and William together.

Have you?

And why is that? What dynamic did they have?
 
IMO the point of the truck drivers evidence is relevant -
1. There were unknow cars driving in the area when WT went missing.
2. The truck driver saw an unknow car in the area where WT went missing and the driver was acting suspiciously.
This points to the fact that there were unknown cars/people in the area that were not noticed by the neighbors and could have been involved in WT's disappearance.
I think it would’ve been of value if the truck driver reported seeing these vehicles in / coming out of Benaroon Drive.
 
I know it is a long shot but William was not at BCR so he had to be somewhere.
Saying it again IMO that house had a well hidden safe. Built by an engineer, who had lived in the bush in PNG.
I have a well hidden safe my son had a business. Come on I bet you have a place no one knows about for valuables. You are one smart person.

Bold of you to assume I have valuables.
 
“The foster mother, who cannot be legally identified, was also asked in the video why she didn't call Triple-O - or the foster father - when she first realised the then-three-year-old child was missing on September 12th

'I thought maybe William had walked off and maybe (the foster father had) seen him on the road and picked him off,' she said.

During the first half of the star chamber interrogation, the foster mother repeatedly - more than 50 times - said 'I don't know' or 'I can't remember'.

In the video, counsel assisting the NSW Crime Commission, Sophie Callan is heard asking the foster mother why she didn't check the verandah of the Kendall house on the NSW Mid North Coast when William went missing.

She replies: 'It never occurred to me to look on the verandah'.

The foster mother was also asked about discrepancies in one of her accounts that she was outside on the verandah when William vanished, and the version that nine people, including her siblings, said she'd been inside making tea when he vanished.

'After alerting [a neighbour] to William's disappearance, [she] drove her mother's car to Batar Creek Road
and placed William's body somewhere in the undergrowth.'

'William under his own steam could not travel beyond the area of the intensive search,' he said.

'The conclusion there must have been human intervention.”
 
Ms Callan asked if the woman had an expectation of William's body being found in the garden beds around the house or the roadside corner near the riding school.

"Do you have any expectation of William being found in those locations?" the barrister asked.

"No," the foster mother replied.

"Why not?" Ms Callan pressed.

"Because I didn't take him there," the woman replied.


"Where did you take him?" Ms Callan continued.

"I didn't take him anywhere,' the foster mother shot back flustered.

The woman explained why she had decided to take her grandmother's car to the riding school to look for William before calling triple zero.

She said she had just made a guess about the direction he was going in a frame of mind where she "wasn't making sense".

"I don't remember sitting back and being logical," she said.



https://www.mailtimes.com.au/story/...d-have-owned-up-to-dumping-3yos-body/?src=rss
 
Professional investigators have looked at the Camera and photo times….

Please enlighten me…. What did they look at. What did they find….There is been no announcement that I am aware of.

Manipulation of EXIF is really easy. So easy that forensic experts cannot pick it up when transferring between devices.

Fess up with your evidence. What was found?

My scenario is that it happened earlier than most people have been lead to believe.

In 2019 they said they were unsure at the inquest. Nothing has been released since. Look at digital manipulation of JPeG files. It is very easy to do and is not detectable.

There are pages of discussion on this. Most people do not have the technical skill to do it. I do. Have you looked at the evidence. It is staring you in the face. Don’t equate your technical inability to do this with it being untrue. I am 99% convinced they were not taken that day.

I think your walk to the graveyard could easily be right. I have four children with at least 100 water bottles stuffed in draws.

My best estimate for the date of the photos is when the foster grand father died. I know someone posted grave data. I literally think the children are drawing for the grave. I think the flowers in the planter box are for the grave.

I think the journey happened, just not on that day.
The photos are correct. It was spoken about many times today in court today ( I was there ) about the photos.

Time to let it go.

" We accept that as last point of reference. Logical starting point the last photo"
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Current Disappearance of 3yo William Tyrrell Pt 2 * FM guilty of assault & intimidation

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top