Current Disappearance of 3yo William Tyrrell Pt 2 * FM guilty of assault & intimidation

[Kurve]

Continued from PART 1

Criminal charges the former foster parents currently face as at 15 April 2022 include:

• Apprehended Violence Orders on both (AVOs)
• Lying to the NSW Crime Commission on former foster mother *Not Guilty
• Lying to the NSW Crime Commission on former foster father *Not Guilty
• 2 x charges of assault against a child on former foster mother *Guilty
• 1 x charge of assault against a child on former foster father *Not Guilty
• Stalking &/or Intimidation on both *Guilty
• Dummy bidding real estate fraud *Guilty

TIMELINE

Where's William Tyrrell? - The Ch 10 podcast (under Coroner's subpoena)

Operation Arkstone

Suppression orders are in force, please use the following to indicate:

FM - Foster Mother
FF - Foster Father
FGM - Foster Grandmother
FD - Foster Daughter
FPs - Foster Parents

Up to you if you wish to refer to them as former fosters but please write it in full, strictly using the above initials. No deviations.

Other initials posters will use informally but should not are:

BCR - Batar Creek Road
MW - Michelle White
SFR - Strike Force Rosann
AMS - Anne Maree Sharpley
One even reduced bike riding to - BR

 

[BFew]

I guess I'm lucky Mr Craddock talks very slowly with lots of pauses

So it obviously wasn't very important, or old news, or the media would have reported on it .

 

[alwaysintrigued]

So it obviously wasn't very important, or old news, or the media would have reported on it .

I often wonder why the media report on what they do & don't.

 

[31550]

I guess I'm lucky Mr Craddock talks very slowly with lots of pauses

I for one appreciate someone reporting (as directly as they can) from the inquest. I give that more weight than what I read in the mainstream media.

 

[31550]

“I am just trying to find this red.

“I think, in all this green, I’ve got to see red somewhere.

So much green. And all she wanted was a hint of red.

Maybe that's why she couldn't find him? As I understand it the rear of the Spiderman suit was predominantly blue, with very little red.

 

[alwaysintrigued]

I for one appreciate someone reporting (as directly as they can) from the inquest. I give that more weight than what I read in the mainstream media.

Thanks, I like to hear the evidence / testimony myself.

 

[Underarrest_]

Maybe that's why she couldn't find him? As I understand it the rear of the Spiderman suit was predominantly blue, with very little blue.

That’s true but I don’t think you’d miss the bright red in the green.

 

[Wallace52]

I often wonder why the media report on what they do & don't.

Because some of it is under suppression and then also they have like 400 words to tell a story so they pick the most interesting part.

IMO

 

[Wallace52]

How good is your shorthand? Or do you have a transcript?

Maybe she’s like me and she types 167 words a minute.

There is no ban on laptops, you can use them to type and many people do bring them.

 

[Kurve]

Maybe she’s like me and she types 167 words a minute.

There is no ban on laptops, you can and many people do bring them.

Yeh I can type pretty fast as well but it's a different matter quoting verbatim.

 

[alwaysintrigued]

Because some of it is under suppression and then also they have like 400 words to tell a story so they pick the most interesting part.

IMO

True & that's why I suggest the one question on drop cloth's was not reported on

 

[31550]

Maybe she’s like me and she types 167 words a minute.

There is no ban on laptops, you can and many people do bring them.

Most laptops these days have the ability to record (some even automatically transcribe).

 

[alwaysintrigued]

Most laptops these days have the ability to record (some even automatically transcribe).

You can absolutely not record in a court room from any devices.

The Coroner spoke about this on Thursday morning at the start, when she was discussing what could & could not be reported on, she also was speaking about breaches of her orders.

She said :

Coroner : "I have already had to speak to people about harassment of the FM. Breaches of my orders in the past have been taken up by police."

Coroner " Journalists should be well aware of using phones or other recording devices in court rooms"

For the days I attended last week there were a lot of journos in the court room ( where previously most sat in the media room ) , approx 15 each day.

I did wonder why? & most do have laptops .

 

[31550]

You can absolutely not record in a court room from any devices.

I knew that. I wondered how they police this if people can take laptops in.

Besides, if people can transcribe what is said, what's the difference?

 

[Lady O]

Yeh I can type pretty fast as well but it's a different matter quoting verbatim.

You can't record it because that's against the law!!

 

[alwaysintrigued]

I knew that. I wondered how they police this if people can take laptops in.

I don't know, but the Coroner watchers her court room like a hawk.

I guess if a journalist is not madly punching away on their keyboards or writing furiously than that might be a giveaway?

I don't know how they'd police it from the media room, but there are camera's everywhere & everything is reordered.

I didn't see any member of the public with a laptop thou, just good old paper & pen.

 

[Wallace52]

You can absolutely not record in a court room from any devices.

The Coroner spoke about this on Thursday morning at the start, when she was discussing what could & could not be reported on, she also was speaking about breaches of her orders.

She said :

Coroner : "I have already had to speak to people about harassment of the FM. Breaches of my orders in the past have been taken up by police."

Coroner " Journalists should be well aware of using phones or other recording devices in court rooms"

For the days I attended last week there were a lot of journos in the court room ( where previously most sat in the media room ) , approx 15 each day.

I did wonder why? & most do have laptops .

No one is recording on a laptop. People use them in court to type. Not everyone knows short hand.

There are no issues with anyone bringing in a laptop to type on.

The rules are that you can’t record voice or video and you cannot take photographs.

 

[Wallace52]

Yeh I can type pretty fast as well but it's a different matter quoting verbatim.

I type 167 words per minute and that is faster than most people speak.

When I type, I type verbatim and I’ve been at some court matters for the fosters and I’ve never recorded ever, and I’ve been able to get almost every word of what I needed by typing.

 

[alwaysintrigued]

No one is recording on a laptop. People use them in court to type. Not everyone knows short hand.

There are no issues with anyone bringing in a laptop to type on.

The rules are that you can’t record voice or video and you cannot take photographs.

Yep, well aware.

I just found it odd that the Coroner even had to mention that was all.

 

[Underarrest_]

Hence the "drops (drop sheets)" being mentioned.

Sorry I haven’t seen this about the drop sheets before. Do we know what FM’s response was?

 

[alwaysintrigued]

Sorry I haven’t seen this about the drop sheets before. Do we know what FM’s response was?

FM was asked if she knew if her father had any drop cloth's in the garage

Her reply was " I don't think he had any drop cloth's. I don't know"

 

[Wallace52]

Yeh I can type pretty fast as well but it's a different matter quoting verbatim.

I can quote verbatim but I don’t get every single point of every sentence.

There’s also crucial whole sentences I miss.

 

[Wallace52]

FM was asked if she knew if her father had any drop cloth's in the garage

Her reply was " I don't think he had any drop cloth's. I don't know"

Thanks.

 

[BFew]

For the days I attended last week there were a lot of journos in the court room ( where previously most sat in the media room ) , approx 15 each day.

In the media room, whilst the inquest is in session, could the media, see (on one of the screens) the faces of most of the public (including the fosters) and media in the main inquest room?

 

[Wallace52]

I knew that. I wondered how they police this if people can take laptops in.

Besides, if people can transcribe what is said, what's the difference?

That’s just the law, and most people cannot transcribe just by typing.

 

[alwaysintrigued]

In the media room, whilst the inquest is in session, could the media, see (on one of the screens) the faces of most of the public (including the fosters) and media in the main inquest room?

I don't know I wasn't in the media room. I don't know what they can see.

Depends on where you sit in the court room in the actual court, but yes you can see the Fosters