Current Disappearance of 3yo William Tyrrell Pt 2 * FM guilty of assault & intimidation

Remove this Banner Ad

Continued from PART 1

Criminal charges the former foster parents currently face as at 15 April 2022 include:
  • Apprehended Violence Orders on both (AVOs)
  • Lying to the NSW Crime Commission on former foster mother *Not Guilty
  • Lying to the NSW Crime Commission on former foster father *Not Guilty
  • 2 x charges of assault against a child on former foster mother *Guilty
  • 1 x charge of assault against a child on former foster father *Not Guilty
  • Stalking &/or Intimidation on both *Guilty
  • Dummy bidding real estate fraud *Guilty
TIMELINE

Where's William Tyrrell? - The Ch 10 podcast (under Coroner's subpoena)

Operation Arkstone

Suppression orders are in force, please use the following to indicate:

FM - Foster Mother
FF - Foster Father
FGM - Foster Grandmother
FD - Foster Daughter
FPs - Foster Parents

Up to you if you wish to refer to them as former fosters but please write it in full, strictly using the above. No deviations.

Other initials posters will use informally but should not are:

BCR - Batar Creek Road
MW - Michelle White
SFR - Strike Force Rosann
AMS - Anne Maree Sharpley
One even reduced bike riding to - BR :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Yes, CCTV has him passing the tennis club about 8:40am.
With a 9 minute or 13 minute adjustment depending on which version you believe. However FM statement says he was in the house when she called Spedding, which has been shown to be 9.03am so that's yet another discrepancy.
 
Yes but aren’t police saying they believe FM put William in the car and took him to somewhere near that intersection?
This is why they have expert testimonies about bones,etc?

Of course. But those who are adamant FM did it, are now forced to jump off the police theory horse. She now must be somewhere else and they are not interested in the police theory.


Regardless of the police evidence, the coroner needs to determine the probable cause and circumstances of William's death. The nature and intention, time and location of the FM drive provides vital information to determine that. Why doesn't anyone want to talk about it?

What evidence?
 
Because there is another week of the inquest and then the findings will be published in 2025.

Maybe if the FM takes the stand at the upcoming tranche, as the policy lawyers have requested; the Coroner may have a more comprehensive understanding about the questions you’ve outlined.
I don't get it. Establish the timeline. That should have been the starting point. Why waste everyone's time with random truck drivers who didn't see anything except unidentified cars and unidentified drivers?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Then there is something very critical to consider and it should probably be referred to as a what if.

What if the created times were actually the times? But then I have the following question continually circling in my mind and that is:

What would be the reason someone would want to prove that they were with William (his foster grandmother and his biological sister) and they were all alive and present and positioned on the deck at 48 Benaroon Drive in Kendall at the times between 9.37 and 9.39 on 12/9/2014 when it could be proven (likely) beyond doubt (by cctv images captured in Lakewood and later verified by police investigators) that the foster father was in the Lakewood location at these times and Lakewood was approximately 10 kilometers away?

Relevant FACTS are:

  • The photos have been used as POL.
  • The FGM even volunteered their existence in walk through ( which I found insightful because it wasn't asked) " This was where the photos were taken"
  • The 000 reporting happened after 20 min not 2 hrs usual despite the hundreds of places he could hide ie it was truncated on purpose to present an abduction as more likely
  • The photos were shown on arrival of WH to show normalcy and promote POL
  • All FPs painting down and away from the cul-de-sac. WT can only go down hill

The effect of these steps was to make it unlikely on face value that FM was involved. Perpetrate an alleged hoax.

What does it achieve? FF alibi has been checked. Not him. The effect though IF they are wrong is that instead of having 20 minutes to make a drive she has nearly an hour.. Her CC questioning where she said he would be found in future upon clearing land is imo an " embedded confession" in witness statement parlance for where she hid him. No one was there to hear/ see them before 9.30..

Perhaps SFR has done testing to prove them but they haven't made that testing public and until they do I remain sceptical of the time because of the COG behaviours all pointing to an intentional manipulation of time. That and the fact SFR has got it wrong on Cobb & co.

Their manipulation achieves a purpose. To create an alibi for FM..even her showing the photos to WH she could asses quickly that WH didn't look at EXIF.....so possibly the idea of manipulation germinated at that point and was finessed in the few days after

If the time remains 9.37 then she has 10 mins to drive. If it's the nearly hour he could be anywhere..Perhaps thats why she so confidently stated he'd be found in the distant future upon clearing land for development.
 
Do you have a "burner phone"? Do you know anybody with a "burner phone"?

A lot of people have burner phones for varying reasons, as a spare, for work or because they're having an affair.

We know that even Russell Hill had a burner phone with him when he was stabbed at Wonnangatta.
 
If neighbour knew that a couple of kids were visiting he could have just used the word "children" because he would assumed that they were both playing. He does not mention adults voices, yet FM alleges she is playing with kids and that FGM was outside for a time as well. Or maybe adult voices do not carry as much as adult voices could explain it.
Agreed. Not perfect
 
A lot of people have burner phones for varying reasons, as a spare, for work or because they're having an affair.

We know that even Russell Hill had a burner phone with him when he was stabbed at Wonnangatta.
Do you have a "burner phone"? Do you know anybody who has a "burner phone"?

Didn't Russell Hill just have a second phone, to facilitate his long running affair? What evidence is there it was a "burner phone"?
 
No I did not go to inquest or listen to hours of podcasts. If it was not seen it was not witnessed, that is, there is no proof, is all I'm saying. Yes it is possible FGM had dementia, yes it is possible that they rode the bikes, yes it is possible William was run over by the postie.

FGM walkthrough : FF left at 8:00, allegedly
FM statement : FF left after 9:00, he was running late.allegedly
FF walkthrough: left 9ish. allegedly
CCTV at tennis club has him there before 9:00

So do you know when FF left FGM house, after all these years? Please let us know.

LRitz, re: "...it is possible William was run over by the postie."

From memory, that's the second time you've suggested that. Have you seen that allegation by anybody in the investigation, or what are you referring to?

At the time of the Local Court hearing for Gary Jubelin's charges it was reported that Det Sgt Beacroft had been asked (I don't know when) about Det Sgt Lambert's view about the postie. She was reported to think it "far-fetched", but I've never seen an explanation for what his view actually was.

The "I Catch Killers" book by Jubelin and Box says the postie's early delivery time that day (8:45am) was verified by CCTV cameras around Kendall. If that's correct, I think it's likely the postie can't have run over William, MOO.
 
Regardless of the police evidence, the coroner needs to determine the probable cause and circumstances of William's death. The nature and intention, time and location of the FM drive provides vital information to determine that. Why doesn't anyone want to talk about it?
It was talked about for 4 hours at the inquest last week with the NSW CC video being played to the Coroner.
 
Yes, CCTV has him passing the tennis club about 8:40am.

So you don't know of the FGM was at the inquest or what time the FF left after all these years?

Is it your view that if no one saw anything it didn't happen?

And yes I do believe those thing could have happened in that time frame as all activities were of a short duration IMO
Yes. CCTV is certain.

To explain my comment Wallace52, it was reply to alwaysintrigued who asked me in post 6358 "So you don't know of the FGM was at the inquest or what time the FF left after all these years?"

I was pointing out that there were differences in statements of time FF left the house. The FF and FM, are wrong if they say he left at or about 9:00. Maybe FF has early signs of dementia.

I think the FF left the house at least before the time to drive to the tennis club. So ~ 8:35 to 8:40 around that time. But he could have left earlier. So the time FF left the house is possible between early 7:30 am to 8:40 am. He could not have left at 9:00 unless he doubled back after going past the tennis club.

If alwaysintrigued is implying that they know for certain what time FF left the house can they let me know.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

A burner phone is just a simple prepaid. Are you trying to imply anybody with a burner phone is a criminal?
"Burner phone" has a specific meaning - it's a phone to use and then dispose of. There are millions of prepaid phones that aren't "burner phones". And the fact they are disposable and used (not solely) by criminals definitely brings with it connotations associated with nefarious purposes.
 
A burner phone is just a simple prepaid. Are you trying to imply anybody with a burner phone is a criminal?
I thought a burner phone meant a phone which was not registered in the owner/user's real name, and hence could not be traced? (Pretty difficult to do in this country). Lots of us have 'second' phones or SIMS - perfectly legal. A true burner is illegal.
 
It was talked about for 4 hours at the inquest last week with the NSW CC video being played to the Coroner.
And yet there is no definite timeline or location for this drive, as there is e.g. for the Roar photograph?
Shouldn't the coroner have a position on where and when the drive was, at least, if not why?
It's foolish to rely on the FM telling us where and when and why she took the drive. It needs forensic evidence - phone pings etc or at least independent witnesses.
 
"Burner phone" has a specific meaning - it's a phone to use and then dispose of. There are millions of prepaid phones that aren't "burner phones". And the fact they are disposable and used (not solely) by criminals definitely brings with it connotations associated with nefarious purposes.

To you maybe they're associated with nefarious purposes.
 
To you maybe they're associated with nefarious purposes.
It's a semantic issue. Such phones are perfectly legal in Australia however to use them you need an active SIM. And to get a SIM you need to provide legal ID. So truly anonymous phone use is not legal in Australia. IMO.
 
That's very unusual - not sure why they'd call their phones "burners" unless thy intended to dispose of them after use (or maybe they're trying to sound cool because they heard it on Breaking Bad). And I'm going out to see some live jazz tonight! ;)

They're just cheap, basic phones.

A burner phone, or burner, is an inexpensive mobile phone designed for temporary, sometimes anonymous, use, after which it may be discarded. Burners are purchased with prepaid minutes and without a formal contract with a communications provider.
 
With a 9 minute or 13 minute adjustment depending on which version you believe. However FM statement says he was in the house when she called Spedding, which has been shown to be 9.03am so that's yet another discrepancy.
Agree. I think it is easy to be out by few minutes or not know the accurate time FF left . But it is harder to get the whole picture wrong of making the call while FF is there. And to say FF is running late. So someone must have been aware of the time to judge he was late. But it is possible to make mistake. Maybe FF has the so called alleged dementia and it runs in the family.

Again what I think is an issue is any problems of statement before 9:30. This should have been clear sailing if nothing happened until after 9:30.

Also, as previously discussed, what was the pressure to ring Spedding first thing on Friday morning. He couldn't get there any quicker without the spare part. And then why omit the phone call from the statement.
 
And yet there is no definite timeline or location for this drive, as there is e.g. for the Roar photograph?
Shouldn't the coroner have a position on where and when the drive was, at least, if not why?
It's foolish to rely on the FM telling us where and when and why she took the drive. It needs forensic evidence - phone pings etc or at least independent witnesses.
I dare say that the coroner is going to have to decide that for herself, after her hearing all the evidence. That's what they do.

Same as being missing for "5 minutes" when Mr Craddock said " Perhaps it was longer, a matter for the Coroner to determine"
 
It's a semantic issue. Such phones are perfectly legal in Australia however to use them you need an active SIM. And to get a SIM you need to provide legal ID. So truly anonymous phone use is not legal in Australia. IMO.

The cops found a SIM card that was registered to one of the FFs companies, or one he worked for?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Current Disappearance of 3yo William Tyrrell Pt 2 * FM guilty of assault & intimidation

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top