Doggies admit to Chucking in the GF - Do we need to put an * next to their Premiership?

Do we need to put a * next to the Doggies' 2016 Premiership?

  • Due to questionable umpiring & blatant rule abuse.... Yes.

  • If it'll legitimize the Swans' complaints...... No.

  • If it'll piss off Plugger............... No.

  • Jack Watts thinks after 60 years Doggies fans won't care if that * is the size of the moon


Results are only viewable after voting.

Remove this Banner Ad

Your coach has come out and said you got a free ride? Doesn't get much worse than that.

Crying bitter tears about losing six months after the event.

I'd say it doesn't get worse than that.

But then it does.

Hypocriticaly taking the moral high ground when your club has been systematically favoured by the 'competition's' governing body for over 20 years resulting in flags being gifted to your club.

It doesn't get any worse than that.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Crying bitter tears about losing six months after the event.

I'd say it doesn't get worse than that.

But then it does.

Hypocriticaly taking the moral high ground when your club has been systematically favoured by the 'competition's' governing body for over 20 years resulting in flags being gifted to your club.

It doesn't get any worse than that.
Six months is nothing, he is crying bitter tears 11 years after 2006.
 
I found this quote particularly interesting from the article



Um Bevo, given that your mob were guilty of it more than any other, you deserve to be cracked down on.

Also Bevo, we had enough tears from the Bulldogs in 2016, we don't need it to roll on into 2017.

Swans throw the 2nd most. And they deliberately time waste by always playing on after a whistle even when they know the free kick is for the other team.

Plus all the campaigners spent 2016 bitching about Hawthorn - despite the incredible difference in the free kick count for the Dogs. So good luck to them.
 
Can they admit to sliding next? This was a big win for them, not only no free kick, but the injury allowed a big contested ball get, and Hannebery is toast for the rest of the game. As much as I like to see the Swans lose, this was blatantly unfair umpiring in the Dogs' favour. Also, where the **** is the tribunal?
83fb85e30f2ac2a1498669dd1f956c8f
 
Crying bitter tears about losing six months after the event.

I'd say it doesn't get worse than that.

But then it does.

Hypocriticaly taking the moral high ground when your club has been systematically favoured by the 'competition's' governing body for over 20 years resulting in flags being gifted to your club.

It doesn't get any worse than that.
Your own coach's words, and you're in a lather. Talk about an overreaction!
 
Can they admit to sliding next? This was a big win for them, not only no free kick, but the injury allowed a big contested ball get, and Hannebery is toast for the rest of the game. As much as I like to see the Swans lose, this was blatantly unfair umpiring in the Dogs' favour. Also, where the **** is the tribunal?
83fb85e30f2ac2a1498669dd1f956c8f
Blind Freddy would've called that. Terrible non-decision, confirmed afterwards by the umpires association as bad.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

:rolleyes:Time to move on, 2016 is done and dusted. Odd thing for Beveridge to say this close to the new season. Maybe he's just focussing hard on reality this close to the season start, maybe it was a loose moment. Not reaĺly in character for him though, seems pretty guarded in his comments usually.
 
:rolleyes:Time to move on, 2016 is done and dusted. Odd thing for Beveridge to say this close to the new season. Maybe he's just focussing hard on reality this close to the season start, maybe it was a loose moment. Not reaĺly in character for him though, seems pretty guarded in his comments usually.

Right, Beveridge never sucks up the umpires in the media. :rolleyes:
 
Can they admit to sliding next? This was a big win for them, not only no free kick, but the injury allowed a big contested ball get, and Hannebery is toast for the rest of the game. As much as I like to see the Swans lose, this was blatantly unfair umpiring in the Dogs' favour. Also, where the **** is the tribunal?
83fb85e30f2ac2a1498669dd1f956c8f
No free kick in it
 
Crying bitter tears about losing six months after the event.

I'd say it doesn't get worse than that.

But then it does.

Hypocriticaly taking the moral high ground when your club has been systematically favoured by the 'competition's' governing body for over 20 years resulting in flags being gifted to your club.

It doesn't get any worse than that.

Quoted for posterity.
 
Lol - tears

The bitter salty tears in this thread are hilarious.

Keep sooking you bitter flogs. :D:D:D:D:D:D

Read the quote again

I wonder if it's ONLY US (in the spotlight)

This is an attempt at tears, YOUR COACHES WORDS'

Now I am of the firm belief that he's either

a) trying to subconsciously get the umpires to look at every club, thus trying to influence them similar to his comments last year defending umpires after the Adelaide game (he should've been fined for that by the way)

or

b) getting his excuses in early if things don't go to plan (I.e. Because we were in the spotlight for throwing, those umpires targeted us and we couldn't play our normal game)

Either way Bevo is having a sook which was totally unnecessary.
 
After an entire summer of riding Plugger over the result, I really think Mofra has some explaining to do over this shock admission. :drunk:
Bevo - trolling like a boss :cool:
 
Can they admit to sliding next? This was a big win for them, not only no free kick, but the injury allowed a big contested ball get, and Hannebery is toast for the rest of the game. As much as I like to see the Swans lose, this was blatantly unfair umpiring in the Dogs' favour. Also, where the **** is the tribunal?
83fb85e30f2ac2a1498669dd1f956c8f
Maybe Hannefairy could spend the summer learning how to go for the hard ball.
If he went in as hard as Wood he would have been fine.

Note: Upper-thigh is not below the knee.
 
Maybe Hannefairy could spend the summer learning how to go for the hard ball.
If he went in as hard as Wood he would have been fine.

Note: Upper-thigh is not below the knee.
That's why the afl and the umpires association came out after the gf and said he had tunnelled him:rolleyes:

They always do that after legal tackles, yeah right.

And now your coach admits you chucked as well. Guilty conscience!!
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Doggies admit to Chucking in the GF - Do we need to put an * next to their Premiership?

Back
Top