- Sep 18, 2013
- 17,752
- 11,820
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
So this white chick defended the crown during the Mabo case? lol
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
The hood causes minimal discomfort whilst protecting officers from assault. There isn't physical harm caused. Not sure what the age of the offender has to do with it. Either the hood causes pain/injury, or it doesn't. It doesn't, hence why it is approved for use. If it caused pain/injury I wouldn't agree it's use on adults either.
Different story if they are attempting to use it as a psychological device. But that isn't it's intended use.
Getting put into detention would cause emotional distress. It doesn't mean it isn't justified.You speak of physical injury only. Hooding someone with a history of trauma (like many in the youth justice system) would cause immense psychological pain
Getting put into detention would cause emotional distress. It doesn't mean it isn't justified.
Would you agree with the use of a spit hood on someone spitting who hasn't had a history of emotional distress? All I'm arguing is the use of a spit hood does not automatically amount to torture. Regardless of how much you want to over blow it
Not kids, no
Do you agree with Juevenile detention at all?
Which do you think is more emotionally stressful? Sitting in a spit hood for 30 minutes or being locked in Juevenile detention for 12 months?
Remember, I'm not talking about the specific case but the inherent properties of using a spit hood for its intended purpose.
Doesn't mean other centres didntWhen I've worked in Juvie detention we DID NOT REQUIRE THE USE OF A SPIT HOOD!!!!
Doesn't mean other centres didnt
So you have nothing. Once you revert to personal attacks its over.Do you work hard at being an annoying twerp or does it come naturally?
So you have nothing. Once you revert to personal attacks its over.
This was actually OLD news http://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/transcripts/s4511291.htm
NT and Federal Governments knew about it, they just didn't give a shit.
The sickening footage we saw on Four Corners on Monday evening has been around for years and it’s more than a coincidence that the ABC decided to release the story on the eve of the NT elections where the current Country Liberal Party under Adam Giles is already in deep shit. Well done ABC, your political slip is still showing.
Beatin' 'em up's gonna reduce their chances of recidivism?
Don't ask me, I was never *******ed as a kid.
You can shove the spit hood up your blurter for all I care. When I've worked in Juvie detention we DID NOT REQUIRE THE USE OF A SPIT HOOD!!!!
Did you get spat on?
Don't ask me, I was never *******ed as a kid.
You can shove the spit hood up your blurter for all I care. When I've worked in Juvie detention we DID NOT REQUIRE THE USE OF A SPIT HOOD!!!!
You can be charge with assault for just yelling at someone (creating fear in the mind) and I feel that spitting is well and truly many levels up from that.I've always found the status of spitting withing the legal framework to be puzzling and can only assume that it is perception that sees it treated so seriously. I mean, I know it's disgusting, and there is some risk of communicable diseases. But you can be charged with assault because of spitting.I don't see how it can compare to being punched in the face. Disgusting, sure. Contemptuous, of course. but physically damaging, surely not.
What method did you use then to stop people from spitting on you?
Cheers, didn't think that you'd worked in juvie detentionsew their lips up