They might for 6,7 and 10 when it's added to whatever they're getting for May and Martin??Almost dead level. But I don't think Gold Coast will trade either of their picks. But when am I ever right?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
They might for 6,7 and 10 when it's added to whatever they're getting for May and Martin??Almost dead level. But I don't think Gold Coast will trade either of their picks. But when am I ever right?
If Wingard is off to the Dogs, that's Pick 7.
Package 6,7, 10 and Hombsch for 2 and 3 from GC.
That gets us Lukosius and Rankine.
How does that work on the Draft Calculator thingy?
They might for 6,7 and 10 when it's added to whatever they're getting for May and Martin??
Me too, but I'm just talking about the useful pick in the deal I suggested. Maybe 7 this year and their 1st next year.I want a shit load more than pick 7 for Wingard
Almost dead level. But I don't think Gold Coast will trade either of their picks. But when am I ever right?
They have shown a tendency to value a wider spread of picks in the past. If the best talent at 2 and 3 is a genuine flight risk, they really are better off taking 6, 7 and 10 so as to hedge flight risk and talent.
i think its important we make the first move before the Crows because now its made it a whole lot harder for them
Wingard for 7
6, 7 and 10 for 2 and 3
Hmm would we?
Would the Suns?
If Wingard is off to the Dogs, that's Pick 7.
Package 6,7, 10 and Hombsch for 2 and 3 from GC.
That gets us Lukosius and Rankine.
How does that work on the Draft Calculator thingy?
They have talked a lot about locking in a matching pair like Lukosius and Rozee but who knows for sure what will play out?
The trouble is in the past they have had as wide a range of early draft picks as you could wish for and they have completely blown it. So maybe it's time for a coherent strategy of concentrated fire rather than a shotgun blast.
There is definitely something big planned.
They wanted to get this trade out of the way early.
I will wait until the trade period has finished before I start venting.
I wonder if the twins at 6 and 7 would be it. They would have to slide past picks 4, 5 - perhaps where Rozee and someone else not named King will be taken. The top end of this draft does appear to be tracking toward being the most rigged in history.
This makes a lot of sense. With Marshall ready to make the step up Lukosius is less important to us than Rankine. For me Rankine is the one.I think this makes the most sense:
Keep Wingard.
Trade pick 6 and hombsch + for 3.
GC get luka with 2 who they’re balls deep in.
We get rankine at 3
GC still get rozee, lukas best mate at 6 who they would’ve taken at 3.
according to the afl app we have pick 48, even though mitch cleary is reporting that we got pick 41 in return.
eitherway OP title is wrong mods
View attachment 572163
lol when the AFL website and journalists are more wrong than Bigfooty.We traded out both our third round picks in the Polec and pick 6 trades. The return third round pick was next year's. We don't have a 2018 pick in the 40s.