DT 2011 Backs Thread

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

seeing as otten is going out of favour, anyone keen on r.tarrant? should have the best jobsecurity, but i realise not the best scoring potential
 
Just a quick question.

I'm tossing up between ONE of the following defenders:

Gilbert
Grimes
Deledio
Broughton
Enright

I understand the downside in Gilbert playing forward.

Thoughts on the best option of the above would be appreciated.
 
Just a quick question.

I'm tossing up between ONE of the following defenders:

Gilbert
Grimes
Deledio
Broughton
Enright

I understand the downside in Gilbert playing forward.

Thoughts on the best option of the above would be appreciated.

If fit, Broughton, followed by Grimes

Q - Batchelor, Cripps or Puopolo?
 
What are people's thoughts on Bruce?

Is he set to move to a forward type role or will he be HBF/midfield rotation

Interested in what hawks supporters think.
 
Uncertainty on whether Otten will be the sub or not. I say aim for 50+ from Duigan.

Use the loophole ... Put Otten on the field and Duigan as emergency.

If Duigan scores shit (< 50), keep it as it is.

If Duigan scores 50+, sub Otten off for a GC player so you get Duigan's score. Risk there is that you'll cop a zero if any of your other backs are late withdrawals (unlikely in round 1).
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

So I'm not sure who to pick. I've got Lower, Stanley, Toy and Duigan. I need 1 more rookie priced defender. I feel Otten and Buckley will both be subs so that takes them away as choices who else is there? (I've also got Heppell in the midfield).
 
Uncertainty on whether Otten will be the sub or not. I say aim for 50+ from Duigan.

Use the loophole ... Put Otten on the field and Duigan as emergency.

If Duigan scores shit (< 50), keep it as it is.

If Duigan scores 50+, sub Otten off for a GC player so you get Duigan's score. Risk there is that you'll cop a zero if any of your other backs are late withdrawals (unlikely in round 1).
51 lol - now what!?
 
What are people's thoughts on Bruce?

Is he set to move to a forward type role or will he be HBF/midfield rotation

Interested in what hawks supporters think.
Wouldn't mind hearing this as well.

Anyone watch the game last night? He was on 16 at HT but managed to get to 58. I've chosen him as my unique premium but I think i may have got it wrong.
 
To anyone who saw the Brisbane game Saturday night, does it seem like Adcock's DT friendly scoring days are over? I hear he plays more of a shutdown role now, and I'm thinking it might be better cutting my ties before the price change, to someone like Otten. I always knew he'd be a risk, but my structure always seemed better with him in it. In hindsight though, he really was a poor choice.

I don't think I'll even start him this week, favoring Stanley instead.
 
To anyone who saw the Brisbane game Saturday night, does it seem like Adcock's DT friendly scoring days are over? I hear he plays more of a shutdown role now, and I'm thinking it might be better cutting my ties before the price change, to someone like Otten. I always knew he'd be a risk, but my structure always seemed better with him in it. In hindsight though, he really was a poor choice.

I don't think I'll even start him this week, favoring Stanley instead.

With some of the Lions senior players now injured it's time for Adcock to step up big time. As one of our Vice Captains he is going to be trying his guts out, i'd hold on for a few more weeks & see how he goes.
 
With some of the Lions senior players now injured it's time for Adcock to step up big time. As one of our Vice Captains he is going to be trying his guts out, i'd hold on for a few more weeks & see how he goes.
The thing is though, if he scores another 50 this week, I don't think I can afford to hold onto him while guys like Otten make some cash.
 
You have atleast another week til you have to make a call on Adcock. He isn't a huge possession getter, but he isn't a lock down player either. He does need to play defensively in our team, but we do get a bit of run from him. I think he can score better, and you do need to take note of our injury situation during that game. All of our players were out of puff by the end, so i'd expect a bit better from Adcock.
 
You have atleast another week til you have to make a call on Adcock. He isn't a huge possession getter, but he isn't a lock down player either. He does need to play defensively in our team, but we do get a bit of run from him. I think he can score better, and you do need to take note of our injury situation during that game. All of our players were out of puff by the end, so i'd expect a bit better from Adcock.
Oh yeah, he remains in my team this week, whether I start him is another question. Stanley is tempting.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

DT 2011 Backs Thread

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top