Eat a bag of dicks you arrogant Goo chugging D/H's

[Bender_]

The ball had already left the area, there is no rule for incidental high contact off the ball.

Er, high contact is high contact buddy.

 

[GoCROWS!]

Yes Wingard ran from behind into his arm, I've never seen anyone get a free kick for that before.

The chad contest with Hodge seemed to be 50/50 in terms of who ran into who.

 

[Amstaff]

Here's your av RIOLIUSTAR make sure the text is visible, if not I'll adjust it

 

[Lethality]

Er, high contact is high contact buddy.

No, there are different kinds. For example high contact often occurs in marking contests without infringement.

e.g.

 

[Amstaff]

Lol at Lethality bitching about the umpires.

 

[Amstaff]

No, there are different kinds. For example high contact often occurs in marking contests without infringement.

 

[RIOLIUSTAR]

View attachment 165071

Here's your av RIOLIUSTAR make sure the text is visible, if not I'll adjust it

I will see if it fits friend, probably won't though

 

[Bender_]

No, there are different kinds. For example high contact often occurs in marking contests without infringement.

Look, I'm not getting stuck in the cyclical tedium you call a discussion, but let's get to the crux of the issue; why didn't Gibson have the balls to the defensive mark? Was clearly open.

 

[GoCROWS!]

No, there are different kinds. For example high contact often occurs in marking contests without infringement.

e.g.

See if you can spot the difference

 

[Lethality]

What's that supposed to prove? That was after initial contact, I said in terms of who ran into who.

 

[Lethality]

Look, I'm not getting stuck in the cyclical tedium you call a discussion, but let's get to the crux of the issue; why didn't Gibson have the balls to the defensive mark? Was clearly open.

The crux of the issue was that the umpire just invented a free kick I had never seen before.

 

[Bender_]

No, there are different kinds. For example high contact often occurs in marking contests without infringement.

e.g.

****en Jesus.

 

[Bender_]

The crux of the issue was that the umpire just invented a free kick I had never seen before.

What's that? One against the Hawks in Melbourne?

 

[Amstaff]

Lethality gone into total denial now. Embarrassing posting.

 

[GoCROWS!]

What's that supposed to prove? That was after initial contact, I said in terms of who ran into who.

• The ball was dead
• Hodge elected to bump when the ball was not in play
• He collected Wingard high
• It involved the point post which made it potentially a lot more dangerous- kind of like pushing people into the fence
  
  Should miss a final at the bare minimum. After which you will be looking down the barrel at straight sets.

 

[Lethality]

****en Jesus.

Yes, they call that a mark. Incidental head high contact allowed, as it should be. Not all head high contact is the same, or even close to it.

 

[Bender_]

Yes, they call that a mark. Incidental head high contact allowed, as it should be. Not all head high contact is the same, or even close to it.

Right arm.

 

[Lethality]

• The ball was dead
• Hodge elected to bump when the ball was not in play

Nope, this 'elected to bump' is a furphy, he braced himself against the behind post.

 

[Lethality]

Right arm.

Like I said, it was incidental contact off the ball. Wingard ran into the spoil and the trailing right arm was incidental. Nothing in that vine contradicts that.

 

[Bender_]

*sigh*

 

[Geelong Dynasty]

Yes, they call that a mark. Incidental head high contact allowed, as it should be. Not all head high contact is the same, or even close to it.

Cancelled out the phanton goal the whorfies kicked

 

[RightorKhan]

Just Brisbane, mate. Hawthorn going back to back puts them categorically ahead of the handbaggers.

Surely going 2in2 is fair easier achieved than the much rarer/more aspired 3in5? Many clubs have 2in2'd throughout AFL/VFL history only to wish they could've 3in5'd, and shared glory for that much longer. Collingwoods 4in4 and Melbournes 4in5 are the 2 other clubs in history that compare to the incredible feat to 3in5.

 

[GoCROWS!]

Nope, this 'elected to bump' is a furphy, he braced himself against the behind post.

Of course he elected to bump you can see in the video and the picture he puts weight into the leg next to the post rather than pulling away from it to avoid contact.

 

[McRobie]

Pain runs deep in you

Lap it up there's so much more coming

i know we are cooked, so are Hawks, deal with it.

 

[RIOLIUSTAR]

View attachment 165071

Here's your av RIOLIUSTAR make sure the text is visible, if not I'll adjust it

Seems to fit friend...see you in the finals for revenge