Toast Eat One Buckley Haters

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

Bet the average losing margin wasn't 40 points. Post those loses under Mick.
No, they were even worse under Mick.

The three biggest losing margins against the Hawks under Mick (after 2007) were 65, 54 and 45 points, compared to Bucks whose three biggest losing margins have been 55, 47 and 38 points. We also won a flag and made the Grand Final under Mick, yet we lost by more against the Hawks despite that.
 
No, they were even worse under Mick.

The three biggest losing margins against the Hawks under Mick (after 2007) were 65, 54 and 45 points, compared to Bucks whose three biggest losing margins have been 55 and 38 points twice. We also won a flag and made the Grand Final under Mick, yet we lost by more against the Hawks despite that.

Thatsgold.
 
Who won 3 flags.

Which means even mick had a tough time containing good teams.

Hawthorn were hot last year and have also been pretty good too this year. Should have won the GF last year and will go close this year. Give Bucks a break. Hawthorn lost 6 games all of last year and only 3 this year so far. They are the best team in the comp at the moment.
 
We lost to Carlton twice last year, and now that Mick has taken over, we have beaten them twice. Those are the facts.

Bucks>Mick

How are things at Kindergarten today?

By the way, the only stat that matters is that Carlton have 16 Premierships, Collingwood have 15.

No, I'm just sick of wasting my time on negative, one-sided, biased people like yourself that refuse to open their mind to opposing opinions. I debated early in the season, but realised that no matter how much I point out that people like you are wrong, you're never going to change.

So you surround yourself with one-sided people that share your narrow world view? You must be Gen Y. No one else could be that self-absorbed.

You haven't given me any reason to open my mind to opposing position. Your responses consist of Bucks>Mick. Fabulous stuff.

Have a look at the game again. The same errors happen time and time again. The kicking into forward 50 space with no one around. The clumsy tackles, or the ones that don't stick. The kicks too low or high. The disposal to a teammate in worse position. No one crumbing whilst three players go for the same ball.

Basic stuff you learn in Under 10s. And don't give me that crap about Buckley isn't asking for that, it's the players doing it. Hawthorn and Geelong don't do it. They are finely drilled machines, Collingwood, sad to say, are not.

The forward structure, no matter how many stats you or anyone else want to throw out there, is dysfunctional. Has been since Leigh Brown left. It is the coaches job to come up with an effective, functioning one, using the personnel we have. Carlton won a couple of flags in the late 70s and early 80s with only the one real tall, because that was all they had. What is Buckley's plan?

It is absolute folly to think the side can recruit their way out of such dysfunction. Lynch is a pillock. Offers nothing. Clinton Young will never play more than 8-10 games in a season. Never.

Yes, it is the coaches responsibility to identify skill errors, but it's not him that is actually out on the field playing. We've had 40 different players out there on the field this year, with 8 debutantes in their first season. Consistency doesn't come that quickly, especially when we get so many injuries throughout the season that 40 different players have been playing throughout the season, and 8 players who have never played an senior AFL match. Despite all this, we're still 6th on the ladder, and last week we were still an outside chance of making the freaking top 4!

Clarkson and Scott aren't on the field either, and their teams don't display the consistent skill errors we do. The 40 players is irrelevant. Grundy has debuted only recently - are you going to suggest he hasn't had a better impact than Jolly this year despite his youth and inexperience?

Injuries play some factor, but not as much as you defenders of the faith want the rest to believe. Sydney has had some significant outs, especially the past few weeks, hasn't harmed them. Fremantle have had significant outs. Ditto. And how many Hawthorn players returned on Friday after numerous weeks out?

Those 8 players who have never played a senior match have, for the most part, been very good. Dwyer has been excellent all season, but is clearly starting to tire. For some reason, Witts,Kennedy and Martin haven't been given a go despite excellent form in the VFL, and the ordinary form of those in the AFL side.
 
How are things at Kindergarten today?

So you surround yourself with one-sided people that share your narrow world view? You must be Gen Y. No one else could be that self-absorbed.




I am a baby boomer and don't share your view but feel more aligned with DThomas. Now if someone could explain to me how I put someone on the ignore list, you will be the first.
 
It's idiotic to compare GWS to Carlton. Nobody would gloat about that. We lost to Carlton twice last year, and now that Mick has taken over, we have beaten them twice. Those are the facts.

Bucks>Mick

LOL!!! That has to be the most idiotic post Ive seen. Deciding on who is the better coach by who wins or loses a game. You obviously dont believe the abilities of the players have anything to do with the end result.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Mick didn't win us a premiership until his 11th season. He had his ups and downs and so will Bucks. Mick got a very generous run. I'm not sure Bucks will get 11 chances but we have to give him enough chances. The fools that are calling for his head need to pull their heads in and wait it out. We aren't planning on being the next Lions are we? Waiting until the coach has got the team he likes and has developed his coaching skill sufficiently then pulling the rug out from under him? Let's hope not.
 
LOL!!! That has to be the most idiotic post Ive seen. Deciding on who is the better coach by who wins or loses a game. You obviously dont believe the abilities of the players have anything to do with the end result.
By your logic, Carlton were a better side than us last year, despite missing the finals and us finishing top 4, since the abilities of their players would have had something to do with the end result, right?:rolleyes:
 
How are things at Kindergarten today?

By the way, the only stat that matters is that Carlton have 16 Premierships, Collingwood have 15.

So you surround yourself with one-sided people that share your narrow world view? You must be Gen Y. No one else could be that self-absorbed.
And this is exactly why I don't debate with you. Good job attacking me instead of my argument, you've just admitted defeat right then and there.

Not only is it Bucks>Mick, but it's Bucks>God.:thumbsu:
 
By your logic, Carlton were a better side than us last year, despite missing the finals and us finishing top 4, since the abilities of their players would have had something to do with the end result, right?:rolleyes:

Not at all. Its a combination of the two, even then anything can happen in a game of footy that can turn the result. Everything being equal we shouldnt have lost to the scum last year at all. Does that mean Ratten>Bucks???
 
Thats not a fact.
THIS is a fact.

2008 round 7: 65 points
2008 round 18: 54 points
2009 round 15: 45 points
THATSTOLD!!!
21465838.jpg
 
and under Bucks?
You obviously missed this post:
No, they were even worse under Mick.

The three biggest losing margins against the Hawks under Mick (after 2007) were 65, 54 and 45 points, compared to Bucks whose three biggest losing margins have been 55, 47 and 38 points. We also won a flag and made the Grand Final under Mick, yet we lost by more against the Hawks despite that.
Burny, burny, burn, burn!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top