Recruiting EFC Trade/Draft Talk II with F/A rules in OP - Billings for a fourth rounder the latest rumour

[DapperDon]

Just read on the afl site that matera, Bennell and Mckenzie all might be on the trade table. Bennell would be a great pick up for the right price and if I stops ******* up. Would be a great player for us on the outside and forward

I'd take Bennell and Matera in a heartbeat. I suspect if they do leave though it will be back to W.A

 

[ronnysnodgrass]

Hi Everyone, sorry for the intrusion.

I haven't read all of this thread, so apologies if this topic has already been covered, but....

Do you think there is scope for a trade involving Carlisle and Tom Hickey (Saints #2 ruck)?

Not sure of the finer details, but seems like it would suit both clubs needs going forward.

 

[eth-dog]

Hi Everyone, sorry for the intrusion.

I haven't read all of this thread, so apologies if this topic has already been covered, but....

Do you think there is scope for a trade involving Carlisle and Tom Hickey (Saints #2 ruck)?

Not sure of the finer details, but seems like it would suit both clubs needs going forward.

Package him with pick 6 and it'd be close.

 

[Thunder_Dan]

I'd take Bennell and Matera in a heartbeat. I suspect if they do leave though it will be back to W.A

We can only hope.. Matera would provide that spark in the forward line once it hits the ground and well Bennell just does what he does best.. Get the ball haha

 

[Thunder_Dan]

I'd take Bennell and Matera in a heartbeat. I suspect if they do leave though it will be back to W.A

Might be able to package Carlisle, Bellchambers, and someone else for smith,Dixon, Bennell and matera. most likely wouldnt happen but would certainly be handy

 

[DapperDon]

Might be able to package Carlisle, Bellchambers, and someone else for smith,Dixon, Bennell and matera. most likely wouldnt happen but would certainly be handy

We'd need to include our 1st rounder.

 

[Thunder_Dan]

We'd need to include our 1st rounder.

It's a big call but would it be worth it.. Dixon is 24, Bennell is 22, matera is 23 and smith is 25. So all have a full career ahead of them

 

[WEEVZ]

Disappointed Hird doesn't see the merit in playing two rucks again, would've gone Giles in the ruck and McKernan at CHF. I know Hird takes the piss with his team naming, but if we do play a backline of Hooker, Hurley and Carlisle should we play say Goddard at CHF?

 

[MightyDons4]

Disappointed Hird doesn't see the merit in playing two rucks again, would've gone Giles in the ruck and McKernan at CHF. I know Hird takes the piss with his team naming, but if we do play a backline of Hooker, Hurley and Carlisle should we play say Goddard at CHF?

You don't actually think players will be played where we've named them? We do this shit every week

 

[yodellinhank]

You don't actually think players will be played where we've named them? We do this shit every week

It only affects the first goal markets. Question is, who to back out of Hooker or Carlisle...

 

[kelvin_sheedy]

Matera is poo.

 

[BOMBERS 4 LIFE!!!!]

Matera is poo.

Funny thing he would probably be out best small forward in over a decade.

 

[WEEVZ]

Looks like we're gonna be giving Tom Wallis a crack in the VFL. Will we do with him what we did with Jake Long and take him as a father-son rookie if he isn't taken by another club in the national draft?

 

[eth-dog]

Disappointed Hird doesn't see the merit in playing two rucks again, would've gone Giles in the ruck and McKernan at CHF. I know Hird takes the piss with his team naming, but if we do play a backline of Hooker, Hurley and Carlisle should we play say Goddard at CHF?

Genuine question, do you know that there are other threads on this board to discuss these things?

 

[WEEVZ]

Genuine question, do you know that there are other threads on this board to discuss these things?

I do, but I forgot my bad.

 

[BrunoV]

Looks like we're gonna be giving Tom Wallis a crack in the VFL. Will we do with him what we did with Jake Long and take him as a father-son rookie if he isn't taken by another club in the national draft?

Hopefully he has OP by Monday, if you know what I mean.

 

[Zach Package]

This week sure does highlight some stuff. That extended squad we've named has every fit tall player we have in it, and you're still being pretty generous by calling Gwilt, Steinberg and Pears 'tall'.

Don't get me wrong, the talls we do have are very good, we're just exceptionally thin on the ground when it comes to depth.

I'd have no issue with bringing in 3 more in the draft/trade period

 

[WEEVZ]

This week sure does highlight some stuff. That extended squad we've named has every fit tall player we have in it, and you're still being pretty generous by calling Gwilt, Steinberg and Pears 'tall'.

Don't get me wrong, the talls we do have are very good, we're just exceptionally thin on the ground when it comes to depth.

I'd have no issue with bringing in 3 more in the draft/trade period

Do you know if next years crop is better off for talls than this one is? Or are we looking at another midfielder heavy draft crop?

 

[Zach Package]

Do you know if next years crop is better off for talls than this one is? Or are we looking at another midfielder heavy draft crop?

Not a clue, although all the underage players that jumped out this year were smaller types

 

[WEEVZ]

Not a clue, although all the underage players that jumped out this year were smaller types

Fair enough, I hope we pick up at least 2 talls this year regardless of whether we lose Carlisle or not. One for up forward and another (Mitch Brown preferably) for down back.

 

[Vindicater]

I would love to nab Francis in this draft.

I think the kid is going to be the best value in the end.

 

[Eleven 38]

Hi Everyone, sorry for the intrusion.

I haven't read all of this thread, so apologies if this topic has already been covered, but....

Do you think there is scope for a trade involving Carlisle and Tom Hickey (Saints #2 ruck)?

Not sure of the finer details, but seems like it would suit both clubs needs going forward.

Trading Carlisle does not suit our needs in any way shape or form.

 

[YEMOC NAYR]

Trading Carlisle does not suit our needs in any way shape or form.

100%. For us, keeping Carlisle is the priority going forward. Need our spine

 

[Bunk Moreland]

Well this will sound like hindsight hero stuff but it's not cos I was saying it at the time so yeah

Jeff Garlett? WTF? Did we look at him? Why the hell not? Proven small forward, proven goal kicker, lightning quick. Far better get than Cooney

 

[Wella22]

Chose Melbourne over us. Thanks ASADA and AFL.