like your post, this part especially "when were done". thought you might get a bit of a chuckle from this link. george carlin on mans hubris.
quite funny indeed
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
like your post, this part especially "when were done". thought you might get a bit of a chuckle from this link. george carlin on mans hubris.
I don't quite understand, anthropogenic climate change has little visible benefit for anyone with power. It goes against oil, mining, mass production and over consumption. Perhaps those who are investing in green energy, that is about it. Carbon tax I suppose, but that has now been repealed.
http://www.theguardian.com/science/...-researcher-dissects-2013-statement-australia
Yet another takedown of myths spouted by science deniers
Lol.
"Sophie Lewis, from the Australian Research Council’s centre for excellence in climate science"
Lol.
"Sophie Lewis, from the Australian Research Council’s centre for excellence in climate science"
So, I shouldn't even bother reading the article?Lol. Could you get a more overblown title for a Council? Monty Python couldn't have come up with better parody.
Lol.
"Sophie Lewis, from the Australian Research Council’s centre for excellence in climate science"
So, I shouldn't even bother reading the article?
Because she has a long title?
AGW has massive corporate interests pushing it. Nuclear, nat gas, renewables etc. Investment banks were big pushers of carbon trading. Govt see (or saw in the case of Gillard) a massive revenue stream. Climate scientist likewise.
"over consumption"???