itt people post graphs which back up the side of the argument they've already decided is right
also, emma must be right, she's besties with stephen fry
also, emma must be right, she's besties with stephen fry
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Yeah all this non existent global warming is killing us. But hey, at least the models keep going up, that's a win right..? Lol.
Mr Dutton quipped that a late-running Canberra meeting was on “Cape York time”, a reference that has been interpreted as insulting to the region’s indigenous people. Mr Abbott replied: “We had a bit of that up in Port Moresby.”
Mr Dutton added: “Time doesn’t mean anything when you’re about to have water lapping at your door,” prompting laughter all round — until Social Services Minister Scott Morrison noticed the ABC cameraman’s boom above their heads.
Your form of religion doesn't believe in science.Wow, you calling someone ignorant!
Its absurd to think there will be 4c warming by 2030. Its absolute crap, yet certain sections of the media are happy to peddle this nonsense.
Yes, to show what a joke the IPCC models are.
There has been bugger all warming since '98 and suddenly we are going to get 4c warmer in the next 15-35 years?
Yep sure. Amazingly some actually STILL believe this.
Your form of religion doesn't believe in science.
You victims of propaganda, aimed at conning the naive and easily led, never seem to learn from your mistakes, so are doomed to repeat them.
Lol. Go back 100 years.
Amusingly, the Coalition showed their true colors this week:
http://www.news.com.au/national/pol...ns-racist-banter/story-fns0jze1-1227524004873
Jesus Christ.
Well are you saying the ABC and Fairfax make stuff up?Pathetic. There is NO science that gives rise to a 4c temp increase, merely crap models, which have been shown to have no predictive value. You appear to have absolutely no idea on the topic, merely a propensity to regurgitate nonsense from the ABC and Fairfax.
Humour from SRP's version of Pavlov's dog.
Long enough back for you...?
Well are you saying the ABC and Fairfax make stuff up?
Ah well, thank goodness for the HUN then.They will give airspace to utter numpties (just as the BBC did with Emma Thompson). The Guardian is even worse.
And Asbestos and Tobacco aren't harmful.Pathetic. There is NO science that gives rise to a 4c temp increase, merely crap models, which have been shown to have no predictive value. You appear to have absolutely no idea on the topic, merely a propensity to regurgitate nonsense from the ABC and Fairfax.
How is it such people get any air time. A completely idiotic statement, yet the BBC gives her oxygen.
Even worse is the Guardian's effort in bold, lol at 4c warming by then. Does anyone actually believe any of this any more? Where is Bit Pattern?
http://www.theguardian.com/environm...hompson-got-right-and-wrong-on-climate-change
Actress and Greenpeace activist Emma Thompson was interviewed on BBC Newsnight about Shell’s drilling in the Arctic and associated climate change threats. In the interview, Thompson made some inaccurate statements about the timescales associated with those climate threats. However, her concerns are generally justified.
"if they take out of the earth all the oil they want to take out, you look at the science – our temperature will rise 4 degrees Celsius by 2030, and that’s not sustainable."
So, Thompson was off by three to four decades. However, because of the lag between the time when we emit greenhouse gases and when their full warming influence in realized, the highest emissions scenario considered in the latest IPCC report suggests we would commit ourselves to 4°C warming by 2050
Selective data.Wow, you calling someone ignorant!
Its absurd to think there will be 4c warming by 2030. Its absolute crap, yet certain sections of the media are happy to peddle this nonsense.
Yes, to show what a joke the IPCC models are.
There has been bugger all warming since '98 and suddenly we are going to get 4c warmer in the next 15-35 years?
Yep sure. Amazingly some actually STILL believe this.
Meds is right in some extent that the moral panic of some isn't justifiable within a reasonable discourse, but on the same side of things Meds response is like that of most reactionaries. Political opposition for the sake of it.
This thread is proof that the question of warming isn't that relevant to the individual. Views from either side are shaped not by the science and it's limitations but by the needs of their preexisting ideological prejudices.
Meds is right in some extent that the moral panic of some isn't justifiable within a reasonable discourse, but on the same side of things Meds response is like that of most reactionaries. Political opposition for the sake of it.
so to act unilaterally.
lol.
there are innumerable examples across the world of efforts to mitigate AGW, put a price on carbon, reduce carbon emissions and develop alternative energy solutions. claiming AU acted "unilaterally" is nonsense.
At $25 a tonne we certainly were. There was no intl trading system for us to link in to. It was an idiotic policy. The ALP were keen to tell us it wasn't about raising money as they gave compensation ie bought votes with the revenue. So they were either faced with a price way out of line with Europe or massive revenue shortfall
So, how about you tell us. Were you actually in favour of this?
i've never been in favour of an ETS, tbh- when things are good and you're making good profits, why do you care that much about a carbon "tax"?
Why would anyone care about tax?
Nah, sorry, cant think of a reason.