Enough beating around the bush, do you want Norf to fold?

[bontshow]

So you're saying that you believe Cam Vale to be guilty of criminal activity? On what basis do you hold such a strange belief?

Do you remember what I said? I've forgotten.

 

[jacko57]

Do you remember what I said? I've forgotten.

Not verbatim, given you had the post deleted.....but IIRC, you said that he had been guilty of criminal/fraudulent behavior..as I recall, it was inaccurate, and well out of order. But apparently fair play in your daily obsession to find anything and everything at Arden St deserving of condemnation.

 

[bontshow]

Not verbatim, given you had the post deleted.....but IIRC, you said that he had been guilty of criminal/fraudulent behavior..as I recall, it was inaccurate, and well out of order. But apparently fair play in your daily obsession to find anything and everything at Arden St deserving of condemnation.

I thought it was related to him being the whistleblower. Suggesting he saw what happened at the Storm so was a good appointment for North to have someone who knows how to fudge the numbers.

I didn't realise he explicitly denied being the whistleblower, but I thought he was.

 

[jacko57]

I thought it was related to him being the whistleblower. Suggesting he saw what happened at the Storm so was a good appointment for North to have someone who knows how to fudge the numbers.

I didn't realise he explicitly denied being the whistleblower, but I thought he was.

OK, so you thought he was the whistleblower at Storm and retracted that ; but it was ok to suggest he would be happy to fraudulently alter financial figures that legally need to be independently audited?

 

[bontshow]

OK, so you thought he was the whistleblower at Storm and retracted that ; but it was ok to suggest he would be happy to fraudulently alter financial figures that legally need to be independently audited?

I dunno, I recall it being the Storm reference I was picked up on so maybe not.

 

[royals1922]

Lol, you do realise you're just displaying for everyone your poor comprehension skills.

Defamation requires a known false statement to be made, if you believe it to be true you can not be convicted.

Grif you know the Cam Vale comment was out of order....

 

[bontshow]

Grif you know the Cam Vale comment was out of order....

Hence I didn't just get my comment deleted, I got the whole thread removed.

 

[ozzyoslo]

Lol, you do realise you're just displaying for everyone your poor comprehension skills.

Defamation requires a known false statement to be made, if you believe it to be true you can not be convicted.

Keep to the argument gwiffy.......youre trying to divert here.Shifting the subject

 

[bontshow]

Keep to the argument gwiffy.......youre trying to divert here.Shifting the subject

Do I want North to fold? Nah, I can see how it would help my club but I couldn't wish it on their supporters.

 

[DeadlyAkkuret]

Oooh, a grammar flame and a username flame

GAME OVER

Watch out, they'll be talking about '96 soon.

 

[KGBeast]

We shouldn't kill Norf. We should take them to a farm somewhere where they can run around and be happy

 

[roosmad]

I've been meaning to ask - who is the chick in your avatar? Spitting image of a bird I banged in Shanghai.

a chick that i did in Thailand..

 

[roosmad]

How did I know Brad Scott was lucky to survive this season? Gee I dunno mate, maybe it was the fact your team seemed cooked by the half way mark despite having a dream draw and bugger all injuries, or maybe it was the deafening roar of countless Norf flogs demanding he be sacked on your team board?

half a season is exactly that half a season...by seasons end he was never going to be sacked, bullshit comment from you...


Oh and despite Clarkson's faults he is a premiership coach who changed football forever by pioneering the
zone defense

that was sydney, and to an extent st kilda, no credit for you there, by the way what a shit style of play it is...

. Brad Scott has yet to even coach a finals victory, and I don't think anyone other than Norf supporters will be tipping him to take his team to a flag anytime soon.
He's an ordinary coach, I'm hardly the only one saying it. His gameplan is outdated

how do you come up with this one??????

and his match-day tactics are rubbish. His record of developing young talent is questionable at this point, and he very publicly distanced Norf from it's "shinboner spirit" of the past which was a huge mistake.

I admire him for taking a stance, and leading the club in a positive (not the underdog) style of previous.

Norf's first choice of coach in 2010 was Nafan. He told your club to get stuffed when offered the job

nafan was our first choice yes, he told us to piss off yes, sadly for nafan he told us to piss off in the early 90's just as we commenced our most dominate period, figjam would have played in 2 flags,
he went to the pies and played in none...hopefully lightening strikes twice....

. Norf was then forced to settle for Brad Scott, who was never on any other club's radar for that matter. Going purely on results he's proved to be extremely average so far. In fact Dean Laidley's record is infinitely better.

scott and laidleys records are similar, scott will end ahead of him easy.......

 

[royals1922]

Clarkson's first 3 years: 68 games 28 wins
Scotts first 3 years: 67 games 35 wins
Malthouse first 3 years 66 games 28 wins
Mark Thompsons first 3 years 67 games 32 wins
Laidley's first 3 years 67 games 34 wins
Pagan's first 3 years 70 games 43 wins
Michael Voss's first 3 years 68 games 25 wins
Hardwick's first 3 years 66 games 24 wins
Worsfold first 3 years 69 games 36 wins

Highlighted records are the coaches with 50% or more

Yeh, Scott's done shite.

 

[dymot]

Clarkson's first 3 years: 68 games 28 wins
Scotts first 3 years: 67 games 35 wins
Malthouse first 3 years 66 games 28 wins
Mark Thompsons first 3 years 67 games 32 wins
Laidley's first 3 years 67 games 34 wins
Pagan's first 3 years 70 games 43 wins
Michael Voss's first 3 years 68 games 25 wins
Hardwick's first 3 years 66 games 24 wins
Worsfold first 3 years 69 games 36 wins

Highlighted records are the coaches with 50% or more

Yeh, Scott's done shite.

Refer to the other Scott for the lolz.

 

[royals1922]

Refer to the other Scott for the lolz.

Record of the other Scott is great but only over 2 years though so couldn't include it.

 

[jacko57]

Clarkson's first 3 years: 68 games 28 wins
Scotts first 3 years: 67 games 35 wins
Malthouse first 3 years 66 games 28 wins
Mark Thompsons first 3 years 67 games 32 wins
Laidley's first 3 years 67 games 34 wins
Pagan's first 3 years 70 games 43 wins
Michael Voss's first 3 years 68 games 25 wins
Hardwick's first 3 years 66 games 24 wins
Worsfold first 3 years 69 games 36 wins

Highlighted records are the coaches with 50% or more

Yeh, Scott's done shite.

You're not trying to tell the 4 Stooges they're wrong based on irrelevant stuff like facts are you?

PS pretty fair to say, if comparing Laidley's record with Brad Scott's, the team JYD took over from Pagan was in rather better shape.

 

[Bosk]

Clarkson's first 3 years: 68 games 28 wins
Scotts first 3 years: 67 games 35 wins
Malthouse first 3 years 66 games 28 wins
Mark Thompsons first 3 years 67 games 32 wins
Laidley's first 3 years 67 games 34 wins
Pagan's first 3 years 70 games 43 wins
Michael Voss's first 3 years 68 games 25 wins
Hardwick's first 3 years 66 games 24 wins
Worsfold first 3 years 69 games 36 wins

Highlighted records are the coaches with 50% or more

Yeh, Scott's done shite.

In this game only premierships matter and after 3 years under Scott Norf are still a long way away from challenging for one, despite JB's decision to pump more dollars into the football department instead of using it to pay off Norf's bloated debt.

The two most inexperienced coaches on that list are Scott and Hardwick and frankly I'll be shocked if either of them end up coaching a flag, both lists have way too many holes. (Richmond lacks KPPs, as does Norf plus its midfield is shit)

 

[jacko57]

In this game only premierships matter

Maybe so...but hardly relevant to discussion on whether Scott might in fact be an improvement on Laidley as coach.

 

[royals1922]

In this game only premierships matter and after 3 years under Scott Norf are still a long way away from challenging for one, despite JB's decision to pump more dollars into the football department instead of using it to pay off Norf's bloated debt.

The two most inexperienced coaches on that list are Scott and Hardwick and frankly I'll be shocked if either of them end up coaching a flag, both lists have way too many holes. (Richmond lacks KPPs, as does Norf plus its midfield is shit)

The first 3 years of a coaches development usually are their "learning curve". Scott may or may not win a flag but deserves at least some respect amongst the nuffies. Richmond resigned their coach, from memory, last year for a couple more years, and people talk his team up as well.

A few facts indeed help the debate.

 

[jacko57]

The first 3 years of a coaches development usually are their "learning curve". Scott may or may not win a flag but deserves at least some respect amongst the nuffies. Richmond resigned their coach, from memory, last year for a couple more years, and people talk his team up as well.

A few facts indeed help the debate.

Not when you're dealing with obstinate, uninformed, obsessed trolls.

 

[Bosk]

Not when you're dealing with obstinate, uninformed, obsessed trolls.

 

[jacko57]

Ah, so pointing out the inconsistencies, errors, selective use of facts/stats and irrational aspects in your obsessive anti-North campaign makes me a troll, too, does it?

 

[Bosk]

The first 3 years of a coaches development usually are their "learning curve". Scott may or may not win a flag but deserves at least some respect amongst the nuffies. Richmond resigned their coach, from memory, last year for a couple more years, and people talk his team up as well.

A few facts indeed help the debate.

Respect has to be earned in this game, and thus far Scott's done precious little to deserve any. His media performances have been great but his on-field coaching has been poor and his ability to develop Norf's young 'talent' is still under a question mark.

I'm hardly the only one saying these things, many of your fellow Norf supporters feel exactly the same way about Brad Scott. I'm not about to post quotes from the Norf team board to prove it, but you're free to dig around there yourself and you'll find plenty of evidence to back up what I've said.


Brad Scott MAY yet turn out to be a good coach but thus far he's done very little to show it. I think we both know that if Norf fails to make the finals next year he may well be looking for a new job.

 

[jacko57]

Respect has to be earned in this game, and thus far Scott's done precious little to deserve any. His media performances have been great but his on-field coaching has been poor and his ability to develop Norf's young 'talent' is still under a question mark.

I'm hardly the only one saying these things, many of your fellow Norf supporters feel exactly the same way about Brad Scott. I'm not about to post quotes from the Norf team board to prove it, but you're free to dig around there yourself and you'll find plenty of evidence to back up what I've said.


Brad Scott MAY yet turn out to be a good coach but thus far he's done very little to show it. I think we both know that if Norf fails to make the finals next year he may well be looking for a new job.

Yeah, 10 wins from the last 12 rounds of the season didn't include any indications that the team or the core of younger players had made any progress at all.........