Enough beating around the bush, do you want Norf to fold?

Should Norf fold? (voting is private)

  • Yes, Norf really should fold.

    Votes: 83 51.6%
  • No, we need Norf in the AFL.

    Votes: 57 35.4%
  • Jack Watts is undecided.

    Votes: 41 25.5%

  • Total voters
    161

Remove this Banner Ad

Norf supporters also appear quite adept to deflection, or is that just an illusion to their delusion?:p

What exactly is being deflected? The fact that you ponce into the thread and throw in a one-line insult to a team's supporters? Should we have engaged you on your highly considered opinion that we are delusional?

Nah, you're just another one of these posters who thinks his opinion is worth discussing. It isn't. If I wanted to participate in the kind of thing you think is interesting, I would look at a West Horsham shitfight thread. But I'd rather put red-hot pokers in my eyes and down my urethra than read the drivel in those threads.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

What exactly is being deflected? The fact that you ponce into the thread and throw in a one-line insult to a team's supporters? Should we have engaged you on your highly considered opinion that we are delusional?

Nah, you're just another one of these posters who thinks his opinion is worth discussing. It isn't. If I wanted to participate in the kind of thing you think is interesting, I would look at a West Horsham shitfight thread. But I'd rather put red-hot pokers in my eyes and down my urethra than read the drivel in those threads.

Umm (derr), maybe attacking the clubs of posters for the affirmative.
 
Which in what way is any different to attacking posters directly??

Tool....affirmative (what are you - the shermanator?)
Derr, best if you read more than one line before replying.

And LOL at "for the affirmative". What highbrow intellect!

cough ... tosser ... cough

Oh no, norf supporters are calling me names:)
 
Total bullshit. Comments on Cameron Vale?

Unknowingly false & deleted.

Saying we have sponsors (plural) that don't contribute cash?

It wasn't said in the plural.


If I could be f'd, which I couldn't, I would find literally dozens of posts where your statements are false or deliberately misleading.

Anything you find I'll happily delete.

If you're going to keep aiming kicks in our direction to satisfy your unhealthy obsession, you'd better be prepared for the more skilful kicks coming back at you and stop sooking about them.

So you agree with Jacko that you receive more sponsorships than us?

Does the money for selling Tassie home games count?

As opposed to that sozzled fool wasting Carlton's money buying a minority parcel of shares that gave the club zero voting rights regarding NMFC's affairs.

It's like Tassie, Jacko.

Get the 2 games going, get North dependent on that money, then pull the offer away and watch them agree to more.
 
'Delusional' is when you think you were a certainty to win the flag, if only you had won the preliminary final (2011). Or when you think you only need to win the prelim in order to collect the flag (2012).
I think you'll find very few if any Hawthorn supporters were bragging on Bigfooty that the flag was 'in the bag' the week of the GF, or even straight after our win over Collingwood when our chance of winning it seemed very very high. However if you can post roof to the contrary then go right ahead..... I won't be holding my breath.

Norf supporters on the other hand? Famous for talking up their team on BigFooty out of all proportion. I can post a poll asking which club's supporters overrate their team the most if you like because I'm 100% positive the winner will be Norf. (about the only thing your mob is likely to win in the foreseeable future too)
 
File with Bosk's other posts predicting Scott's demise.......and all the predictions over the last 5 years that North would soon be out of business. :p
...and yet Norf is barely more certain of surviving now than they were 5 years ago - the only thing JB has done is prolong the inevitable by whoring the club out to Tasmania. (after missing being able to whore it out to Ballarat)
So yes Norf is still breathing..... for now..... but for how much longer? I haven't change my view, your club is still doomed.

As for Brad Scott, well frankly he was lucky to survive 2012. Losing by over 100 to the Hawks obviously did his case no favors.
He's never been anything more than a decent PR man and an average coach at best so assuming Norf can afford to replace him with someone better (remains to be seen) I'd be shocked if he's still in charge late 2013. Shocked but happy that is, because I know as long as he's running the show Norf will only ever be making up the numbers....... but then that's basically all your club has ever done since joining the league in 1925 huh. ;)
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

^ Point proven, oh clever one :thumbsu:

When you are super-clever, you know that there are no acceptable alternatives in expression.

untitled-65_zps83e7ff3c.png
:D
 
What you call delusional we call passionate.
Passionate? Norf supporters!?!? :confused:


Umm.... no. Just no.

History has shown Norf supporters are some of the LEAST passionate of any club. That's why Norf is in such a shithole, because most of your supporters are largely indifferent and don't care about theclub enough to bother saving it. JB had to forcibly extract donations from Norf members' accounts because he knew they'd never fork over the cash voluntarily.

Norf's shit crowds, pathetic ratings and woefully low amount of members proves beyond any doubt that most Norf fans don't really give a shit about the club. Frankly who can blame them?
 
Passionate? Norf supporters!?!? :confused:


Umm.... no. Just no.

History has shown Norf supporters are some of the LEAST passionate of any club. That's why Norf is in such a shithole, because most of your supporters are largely indifferent and don't care about theclub enough to bother saving it. JB had to forcibly extract donations from Norf members' accounts because he knew they'd never fork over the cash voluntarily.

Norf's shit crowds, pathetic ratings and woefully low amount of members proves beyond any doubt that most Norf fans don't really give a shit about the club. Frankly who can blame them?

Just like 300 Hawthorn supporters turning up to the club on Grand Final day eh Bosky?
 
Unknowingly false & deleted.

You libelled him "unknowingly"? WTF, that's almost a tautology.

It wasn't said in the plural.

Yes it was and you know it. I called you on it at the time.

Resorting to a lie to cover another lie, griffo? Don't feel bad, it's common. Especially amongst those hypocrites that state "I don't make shit up ... it's always based in fact."

Just pathetic.
 
You're reinventing the truth LtK.

You libelled him "unknowingly"? WTF, that's almost a tautology.

It's not libel if it is unknowingly false.

Yes it was and you know it. I called you on it at the time.

And I gave you a lesson in grammar to explain that I was only referring to one sponsor.

If I meant two or more, why would I say in that thread at the time and again now that I didn't? Wouldn't I back that up by explaining who I was referring to?
 
It's not libel if it is unknowingly false.

Haha, that's superb. Really, that is the most confused garbage you have written in a while. What does it actually mean? I feel like part of my brain just died.

I'm going to change my sig.

And I gave you a lesson in grammar to explain that I was only referring to one sponsor.

If I meant two or more, why would I say in that thread at the time and again now that I didn't? Wouldn't I back that up by explaining who I was referring to?

Oh, please, this is just more bullshit. At the time, you were exaggerating that we had "sponsors" who paid nothing. You were misleadingly trying to suggest that North was so inept that it had a number of non-paying sponsors. When I called you on it, you backed off and corrected it to one: your sub-obsession, the World Vision deal.

It has nothing to do with grammar and LOL at you thinking you would ever be able to give me a grammar lesson.
 
...and yet Norf is barely more certain of surviving now than they were 5 years ago - the only thing JB has done is prolong the inevitable by whoring the club out to Tasmania. (after missing being able to whore it out to Ballarat)
So yes Norf is still breathing..... for now..... but for how much longer? I haven't change my view, your club is still doomed.

As for Brad Scott, well frankly he was lucky to survive 2012. Losing by over 100 to the Hawks obviously did his case no favors.
He's never been anything more than a decent PR man and an average coach at best so assuming Norf can afford to replace him with someone better (remains to be seen) I'd be shocked if he's still in charge late 2013. Shocked but happy that is, because I know as long as he's running the show Norf will only ever be making up the numbers....... but then that's basically all your club has ever done since joining the league in 1925 huh. ;)

you truely are an idiot....nothing more...how do you work out that scott was lucky to survive 2012???bugger me youand griffy can come out with some crap...
you claim he is a decent PR man and average coach? whats clarkson then??? the friggin messiah in your eyes:rolleyes:, clarkson was extremely lucky kennet did not get rid of him during the 2007 season...

so we are just making up numbers what the frick are saints,meltank and scagscray doing then????

idiot
idiot
idiot
idiot
idiot
idiot
idiot
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Enough beating around the bush, do you want Norf to fold?

Back
Top