*pending what version of liberty you deem as appropriate in society. We should not over-litigate[sic] imoEasy to believe there is actually a case to answer considering the reactions in here.
,,, no my concern is the definition of 'unsafe' and the query that: is this really a matter for the courts to achieve resolution and relevant timeframe.Wasn't going to comment as to any guilt but considering everyone has assumed Wilkinson is just being overly sensitive
this gentleman may, or may Not, have innumerable conflicts in his (future) life and no authority to enforce valid resolution. This is not about money.and the boys just said he had a massive dick c`mon who would get upset about that?!! Has anyone considered the possibility of him being exposed (i.e pantsed) so they could see if being black meant he did have a big dick etc. Maybe a young guy didn't feel comfortable with a bunch of guys he didn't quite know yet wanting to talk and harass him about his dick. Anyone who has played footy knows that sort of stuff is not unlikely.
I personally don't think money can achieve his concerns. This is American culture.Plenty of good reasons he could deserve a payout over harassment claims. Of course he may just be looking for money but I don't see the need to discuss that side as it has been plenty discussed already.
Last edited: