Franklin has altercation

Remove this Banner Ad

Yet Geelong supporters get all defensive about the fact Chapman hit a woman

Why is that?

Not sure. Inexcusable, no doubt.

Franklin is simply a serial offender though. An extremely arrogant and unsavoury individual. If I were you, I'd be hoping for a flag this year (likely) and to see the back of him pre-2014.
 
Because it's Buddy, who's coming out of contract and has been playing like an angry man since pre season, what's going on with this guy?
Wellingham not around to help him unwind.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

To be fair, he might have just got pissed off at some chick, and given her a bit of a spray. I'm sure everyone has raised there voice at a woman at one time or another. And no I don't condone violence, intimidation or abuse, just saying that you can get angry with a chick without being a woman abuser.

..sure, plenty of ppl have argued with the opposite gender.. ..possibly quite angrily too.. ..but generally it's someone you have shared experiences with and come at a disagreement over.. ..rarely is it with 'strangers' you've only most recently met..

..another question little asked so far, is what is he doing out on the turps..?..
 
You think there was a choice? Buddy apologising doesn't mean she was not as equally to blame. People argue - not usually by themselves.

Not usually by themselves, but usually with too many drinks under their belt.

Hey, but I'll leave you to your defence of Buddy and your insinuations against this woman. Speaks volumes...
 
Yet Geelong supporters get all defensive about the fact Chapman hit a woman

Why is that?
What the **** does Chapman have to do with a thread about Buddy?

Absolutely **** all. Try staying on topic.

Buddy acted like a twat, that's what this thread is about.
 
What the **** does Chapman have to do with a thread about Buddy?

Absolutely **** all. Try staying on topic.

Buddy acted like a twat, that's what this thread is about.
You are assuming that.

Go have a read what Buddy has tweeted about being verbally abused by the woman and when he fought back she did the old " I will fix you trick"

He tweeted that the Herald Sun is not interested in that she attacked him and he defended herself because that would not make good reading.

How do you know the woman was not in the wrong?
 
You are the exception then.

Go have a read of that thread and all you get from Geelong Flogs is crap like "she must have deserved it"

If that's true, you wouldn't bother getting into the debate. Even pushing a woman (which I think is what he did) is never called for. Not unless she's attempting to assault you.
 
If that's true, you wouldn't bother getting into the debate. Even pushing a woman (which I think is what he did) is never called for. Not unless she's attempting to assault you.
Go have a read of his tweets and you may find that Buddy may have not been the guilty party and that indeed he was defending himself.

As he tweeted the Herald Sun would not be interested in that side of the story.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

"Guy does something stupid while drunk", that's unexpected. Definitely not condoning his actions, Buddy shouldn't have been intoxicated in the first place. As much as we'd like our AFL players not to smoke, do drugs and drink heavily, it is still going to happen. Not condoning that either, some AFL players need to pull their head in.
 
You are assuming that.

Go have a read what Buddy has tweeted about being verbally abused by the woman and when he fought back she did the old " I will fix you trick"

He tweeted that the Herald Sun is not interested in that she attacked him and he defended herself because that would not make good reading.

How do you know the woman was not in the wrong?
I didn't say she wasn't in the wrong.

But getting drunk and screaming at a woman=Twat. She attacked him? Yeah I'm sure Buddy was intimidated.

But again what does Chapman have to do with this?
 
Why am I not surprised to see most of bigfooty attacking the woman in this situation. Even after Buddy himself and the club have admitted he was at fault.

"She probably started it"
"She probably just went to the media for money"
"She got r*ped because she was a ****"

We have quite a few Buddy Franklin/Wayne Carey types on this site.
 
They were having an arguement.
I'm going to assume that she instigated the contact, pretty safe assumption.
So basically she has come up to him and they have argued about something. Lance has stood up and told her to **** off.

Fair enough. Perhaps he should be more cautious with his behavious, but this is a non-news story, just some attention seeking irritant if I had to guess.
 
There is always two sides to every story. His twitter account is certainly saying that she must of said something to him that upset him.

But why does Buddy put himself in these situations all the time? Lots of high profile footballers go through their careers with no incidents like this. Some people are attracted to trouble.
 
They were having an arguement.
I'm going to assume that she instigated the contact, pretty safe assumption.
So basically she has come up to him and they have argued about something. Lance has stood up and told her to **** off.

Fair enough. Perhaps he should be more cautious with his behavious, but this is a non-news story, just some attention seeking irritant if I had to guess.
Pretty much.

But that will not please the haters.

Sure he did the wrong thing but the people who are attacking him assume they know all the facts from an article in the Herald Sun.

As Buddy said in his tweet " the other side of the story would not be a good story for the paper"
 
There is always two sides to every story. His twitter account is certainly saying that she must of said something to him that upset him.

But why does Buddy put himself in these situations all the time? Lots of high profile footballers go through their careers with no incidents like this. Some people are attracted to trouble.
Dude is half the stuff from every AFL club got out then the world would explode.
 
Because the samemeanlong people who are bagging him are the same ones that defended Chapman for hitting a woman.

Just pointing out the hypocrisy.
First off why? It has nothing to do with this thread
Second you mean Geelong fans defend a player from their club? No way.
Third what did you say about Chapman? Hopefully you defended him like you are Buddy? After all you wouldn't want to be a hypocrite.
 
First off why? It has nothing to do with this thread
Second you mean Geelong fans defend a player from their club? No way.
Third what did you say about Chapman? Hopefully you defended him like you are Buddy? After all you wouldn't want to be a hypocrite.
You seem to be stuck on the Chapman thing.

I am not defending Buddy I am just pointing out that as he has personally said " the Herald Sun is not interested in the other side of the story.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Franklin has altercation

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top