BEEG
Hall of Famer
- Aug 2, 2007
- 31,713
- 38,765
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Dallas Mavericks
He stuffed up and apoligised move on people have arguments every day
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Yet Geelong supporters get all defensive about the fact Chapman hit a woman
Why is that?
Wellingham not around to help him unwind.Because it's Buddy, who's coming out of contract and has been playing like an angry man since pre season, what's going on with this guy?
To be fair, he might have just got pissed off at some chick, and given her a bit of a spray. I'm sure everyone has raised there voice at a woman at one time or another. And no I don't condone violence, intimidation or abuse, just saying that you can get angry with a chick without being a woman abuser.
Yet Geelong supporters get all defensive about the fact Chapman hit a woman
Why is that?
You are the exception then.He would deserve the same if not worse criticism if that's the case. Couldn't give 2 hoots if he plays for the Cats or not.
You think there was a choice? Buddy apologising doesn't mean she was not as equally to blame. People argue - not usually by themselves.
What the **** does Chapman have to do with a thread about Buddy?Yet Geelong supporters get all defensive about the fact Chapman hit a woman
Why is that?
You are assuming that.What the **** does Chapman have to do with a thread about Buddy?
Absolutely **** all. Try staying on topic.
Buddy acted like a twat, that's what this thread is about.
You are the exception then.
Go have a read of that thread and all you get from Geelong Flogs is crap like "she must have deserved it"
You are the exception then.
Go have a read of that thread and all you get from Geelong Flogs is crap like "she must have deserved it"
Go have a read of his tweets and you may find that Buddy may have not been the guilty party and that indeed he was defending himself.If that's true, you wouldn't bother getting into the debate. Even pushing a woman (which I think is what he did) is never called for. Not unless she's attempting to assault you.
I didn't say she wasn't in the wrong.You are assuming that.
Go have a read what Buddy has tweeted about being verbally abused by the woman and when he fought back she did the old " I will fix you trick"
He tweeted that the Herald Sun is not interested in that she attacked him and he defended herself because that would not make good reading.
How do you know the woman was not in the wrong?
It's called deflectingWhat the **** does Chapman have to do with a thread about Buddy?
But again what does Chapman have to do with this?
Pretty much.They were having an arguement.
I'm going to assume that she instigated the contact, pretty safe assumption.
So basically she has come up to him and they have argued about something. Lance has stood up and told her to **** off.
Fair enough. Perhaps he should be more cautious with his behavious, but this is a non-news story, just some attention seeking irritant if I had to guess.
Dude is half the stuff from every AFL club got out then the world would explode.There is always two sides to every story. His twitter account is certainly saying that she must of said something to him that upset him.
But why does Buddy put himself in these situations all the time? Lots of high profile footballers go through their careers with no incidents like this. Some people are attracted to trouble.
First off why? It has nothing to do with this threadBecause the samemeanlong people who are bagging him are the same ones that defended Chapman for hitting a woman.
Just pointing out the hypocrisy.
You seem to be stuck on the Chapman thing.First off why? It has nothing to do with this thread
Second you mean Geelong fans defend a player from their club? No way.
Third what did you say about Chapman? Hopefully you defended him like you are Buddy? After all you wouldn't want to be a hypocrite.