Pick 1 well spent there. I like Pendles at pick 5 better.
Pendles looks to be cruising in 2nd gear most of the time but to be fair Murphy's got more reverse gears though
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Pick 1 well spent there. I like Pendles at pick 5 better.
EFAEven 800k a year for 3 years and then an agreement of about 400k after that would be very hard. He would be more suited to Richmond or Carlton with their lack of classdefenders.
Was thomas being booed today?Frawley - 24 disposals, 14 marks, 2 goals today: $800K
Dale Thomas - minimal impact again: $700K+
Carlton pre-jacking their load on Thomas and not being able to afford Frawley: Priceless
He;ll be a whimpering mess after they play us - both sides bagging him!If Thomas was being booed by the Carlton supporters, he must just about feel like the most hated person in AFL currently.
It's a no from me. I'd be targeting FA's who are utilities with good foot skills and a mercurial forward pocket/flanker to round out the list, assuming we are drafting Moore.
My view is we should do whatever we can to get Frawly. He is a gun defender , can go forward, is ever reliable, doesn't really get injured. The fact he is at Melbourne is the reason he has flown under the radar and we are saying he is not worth 800k.
Ask yourself " how important has Harry Taylor been to Geelong"
Frawly would complete our defence adding class and freeing up Reid to go forward and potent it up with that 3rd tall.
Get that boy to the pies- offer him 4 years,!It would be a coup
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Moore is a better talent then Frawley anyway
I'd throw 600-700k his way if he wanted to play for us. Is a gun and will be even better in a successful team.
I'll throw in another $50 if it'll get us over the top600k be okay price to pay
We've already got 4 AFL quality tall defenders. He'd probably play the Maxwell role for us - a role that Maxy and Scharenberg appear to have covered for the next few years - assuming that that's how the club look to use Scharenberg at the beginning of his career.
I don't think anyone can argue with you, we have the money and he will make us a much better side. Pay it I say.Pay it.
Seriously. Pay it. We have that money and he solves more issues than simply the backline. Frawley means we don't need to rely on Keefe anymore. Keefe simply becomes depth for the defence, or depth in general. We can also grrom Keefe for the forward/ruck role.
Having Frawley means a BETTER defence as well. It also means Reid stays forward permanently. I think he's totally worth it, but I'm sure I'm in the minority on that one.
I don't think anyone can argue with you, we have the money and he will make us a much better side. Pay it I say.
Rather Keep it for Our Stars. Beams will be in for a Huge Pay Rise Next Season
Frawley (4 years @ 650k)
Gibbs (4 years @ 600k)
Mundy (2 years @ 500k)
Which are the clubs priorities?
BTW, what were the media saying we were offering/paying Reid for his new contract?