- Aug 20, 2010
- 6,355
- 12,682
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- Manchester City
We have missed Chapman so much this year, really hope he can stay fit next year and Hughes plays with Peel the whole season.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If that's the case, drop literally every forward bar Amiss. He was fine in the second halfSchultz might work hard but his primary job is to kick goals and he just can’t do it.
We were minus 18 points from his wastefulness today
Win some money today?Didn't care to be honest. It could easily of been a 60-90 point loss.
Some players did ok.
Liked some set shot goals from certain players.
Sam Sturt deserves a contract for next season. And I reckon he will get one
If that's the case, drop literally every forward bar Amiss. He was fine in the second half
Johnson and Erasmus one day will be that, in the short term though, I agree.We need bigger bodies in the midfield
Wtf are you on about?Amiss is 19 & taking the opposition best defender. And still found a way to make a goal out of nothing.
Shultz is a middle ager in football terms who has shown at times top level small forward skills. Right now he’s double handling, fumbling, can’t kick a set shot etc.
It’s a false equivalence.
Treacy got 3 goal scoring chances today and kicked 3 goals.If that's the case, drop literally every forward bar Amiss. He was fine in the second half
One - amazing how many posters are quoting an obvious sarcastic commentTreacy got 3 goal scoring chances today and kicked 3 goals.
Amiss got 1 and kicked 1
Sturt got 2 and kicked 2
Jackson got 3 and kicked 2 (and the one he missed was tough from the boundary)
Walters missed 2 - a tough snap in play early on and a boundary shot on his weaker foot, neither easy).
Banfield even - got 1 and kicked it.
Schultz got 3 straightforward set shots and kicked 0. If Walters had gotten those 3 kicks he would have kicked all 3. That’s the difference.
Our game plan is limited and we generate maybe 18 decent scoring chances a game. We cannot afford to carry a battler with no forward craft who misses 3 of those easy chances and still expect to kick a winning score. It’s just not sustainable.
We won centre clearances todayThe result each week comes down to centre clearances for the dockers. We are the worst team in the comp for scoring from turnovers, so if we don’t dominate centre clearance, we won’t win the game.
We need to either: work out how to dominate in the middle, or, work out how to pressure their team to win the ball back. Do neither and we are going to continue to be a crap football team
This is a weird hill to die on. Schultz and Switkowski were absolutely putrid today.One - amazing how many posters are quoting an obvious sarcastic comment
Two - So you legitimately think we should and will drop Schutlz?
He's been below par this season, but we have far bigger issues than him.
That’s just skills and inferior footballing talent.I watched the game on delay as I knew I'd miss the start. I was pausing things and discussing with my son. One glaring issue is we constantly put the ball on our team mates heads. Our kicks and/or handballs were so often not to the players advantage but forced them to stop, allowing the Collingwood opponents to spoil/intercept/halve the contest and with their game style would then fly down the ground and score. Not sure what the 'goals from turnovers' stat is but my guess is that it would be high in Collingwoods favour.
1st quarter especially we had a lot of kicks into our f50 but never to the forwards advantage.
It's like slips fielders dropping catches. They're specifically in a position to one job.This is a weird hill to die on. Schultz and Switkowski were absolutely putrid today.
Suhultz is the biggest momentum sapping player on the team the last few weeks. Small forwards that repeatedly butcher goal chances suck the life out of any afl team.
Hardly a hill I'm choosing to die on.This is a weird hill to die on. Schultz and Switkowski were absolutely putrid today.
Suhultz is the biggest momentum sapping player on the team the last few weeks. Small forwards that repeatedly butcher goal chances suck the life out of any afl team.
I watched the game on delay as I knew I'd miss the start. I was pausing things and discussing with my son. One glaring issue is we constantly put the ball on our team mates heads. Our kicks and/or handballs were so often not to the players advantage but forced them to stop, allowing the Collingwood opponents to spoil/intercept/halve the contest and with their game style would then fly down the ground and score. Not sure what the 'goals from turnovers' stat is but my guess is that it would be high in Collingwoods favour.
1st quarter especially we had a lot of kicks into our f50 but never to the forwards advantage.
Yea agree. Against the mature sides like the pies, lions, dogs and whoever else our midfield is too under sized. Johnno and Ras need a couple more preseasons probably, so we should be trying to bring someone in in the off seasonJohnson and Erasmus one day will be that, in the short team though, I agree.
I'm down to play Jackson a lot more in there as a mid.
No we didn’t. 15-14 their way.We
We won centre clearances today
We
We won centre clearances today
You’re a bad parent for making your child sit through a Freo game.I watched the game on delay as I knew I'd miss the start. I was pausing things and discussing with my son. One glaring issue is we constantly put the ball on our team mates heads. Our kicks and/or handballs were so often not to the players advantage but forced them to stop, allowing the Collingwood opponents to spoil/intercept/halve the contest and with their game style would then fly down the ground and score. Not sure what the 'goals from turnovers' stat is but my guess is that it would be high in Collingwoods favour.
1st quarter especially we had a lot of kicks into our f50 but never to the forwards advantage.