Please tell me what you would do if you were accused of something and thought you were innocent.
You're talking about Ian Robson being accused by Hird I assume.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Please tell me what you would do if you were accused of something and thought you were innocent.
I didnt read his comments that way. IMO he means the club handed over records but they were never taken into consideration by ASADA. He never actually said ASADA destroyed evidence
He said it was a "fact" that Asada had destroyed the thymomodulin spreadsheet!.It didn't look like he was accusing them. He downright accused them.
So are you saying ASADA has the spreadsheet?That has been levelled at us a number of times. Sounded more like a cheap shot than accusing ASADA of destroying them. But I reckon he believes that this should prove what the players were given but ASADA didn't like it and didn't use it
An absence of fesseruppers is the difference?Haha yes; despite the fact that eight of his teammates fessed up to doping and dobbed him in. Of course they would have. Good on you Whately, keep fighting the good fight
He said Asada destroyed evidence.I didnt read his comments that way. IMO he means the club handed over records but they were never taken into consideration by ASADA. He never actually said ASADA destroyed evidence
Haha yes; despite the fact that eight of his teammates fessed up to doping and dobbed him in. Of course they would have. Good on you Whately, keep fighting the good fight
I suspect ASADA will contact his lawyers pretty quickly and demand a public apology quickly or move to take action via the courts.
Expect a contrite Albert to front the media at Tullamarine in the next day or so, offer an apology and blame it on emotion, fatigue, and frustration and that he should not have agreed to go on the show in that state. He will then proceed to do what he always does and blame someone else, in this case Whately, for ambushing him when he was vulnerable.
Yeah FFS want to watchhas it been uploaded to Youtube yet?
To be honest, who knows. Even if we had it, what does it proveSo are you saying ASADA has the spreadsheet?
Well done to Whately for actually asking 3 hard questions tonight to James Hird.
I think he smells blood.
If he does, then expect some others to get the guts up to start actually asking some hard questions.
oh for crying out loud, he isnt saying ASADA destroyed the spreadsheet, he's saying it was given to ASADA and therefore essendon didnt destroy records. He is implying ASADA didnt consider it as evidenceNo, on 360 tonight, Hird said they handed over this spreadsheer and it wasn't them that destroyed it. When Robba asked commented that that was a big accusation, he said that it wasnt an accusation but a fact.
Key word is destroyed, he implied the spreadsheet was destroyed.
Ah. Oh dear. Yes - I think you are right about some fallout then
oh for crying out loud, he isnt saying ASADA destroyed the spreadsheet, he's saying it was given to ASADA and therefore essendon didnt destroy records. He is implying ASADA didnt consider it as evidence
the original claim was he couldnt handle pressure which is ridiculous to suggest of an elite AFL playerGood player doesn't make him adept at life or socially intelligent, obviously. Even he admitted he's made mistakes, obviously he got challenged tonight, lost his cool, then made another one.
Whately pushed his buttons way, way too easily. Hird failed again.
He didn't say they destroyed it. Just said they had it, and that "we didn't destroy it"He said Asada destroyed evidence.
Robbo said that's a big accusation!.
It's not an accusation it's a fact said Hird.
He's in deeeeeep shit.
He said it mxett don't try to sugar coat it mate!.
To be honest, who knows. Even if we had it, what does it prove
i havent watched it, im going off what people have stated was said. Unless they are wrong he never said ASADA destroyed evidence.You need to watch it again.
Just a thought. What jurisdiction does wada have? I mean if they win the appeal and say players banned for a year, why does the afl have to comply? Its not like its an international sport. Cant the afl just say who cares what wada says?
Just wondering.
the original claim was he couldnt handle pressure which is ridiculous to suggest of an elite AFL player
We didn't destroy the evidence.He didn't say they destroyed it. Just said they had it, and that "we didn't destroy it"
Read into it what you will, but I didnt hear him explicitly say they destroyed it
Totally agree. Hird is merely saying they gave records and therefore didnt destroy them.I agree he never stated it. I am also sure they would have been taken into consideration . It's not ASADA's job to raise the defense for the accused
im not, clean your ears outIf you're suggesting that pressure on a sports field reflects how an individual handles pressure throughout all facets of life in general, you're 100% wrong.