Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You still trying to somehow make your QF loss out to be a win..?
I see how you nonchalantly squeezed yourself in at the bottom there..
So for you the next best thing to a Hawthorn loss is a Geelong loss..? Heck, I would've thought you'd prefer to see your team win first.not a win as such. but it certainly didn't help Geelong's cause, which I guess is the next best thing
sure, winning is the desired outcome. but if that doesn't happen, contributing to Geelong's demise is satisfying.So for you the next best thing to a Hawthorn loss is a Geelong loss..? Heck, I would've thought you'd prefer to see your team win first.
Seriously though, all the best to Corey
Here is a short career highlight.
I know right. He basically said he'd rather see Geelong lose than see his own team win. Obsession #101.
Thanks Lethality, allow me to comment on this putrid excuse for a list
- 1 Rhys Stanley INCONSISTENT
- 2 Billie Smedts SPUD
- 3 Jimmy Bartel COOKED
- 4 Andrew Mackie COOKED
- 5 Nakia Cockatoo GUTLESS
- 6 Lincoln McCarthy INJURY RIDDLED
- 7 Harry Taylor (vc) ALMOST COOKED
- 8 Jake Kolodjashnij MEDIOCRE
- 9 Zac Smith MEDIOCRE
- 10 Daniel Menzel INJURY RIDDLED
- 11 Darcy Lang SPUD
- 12 Wylie Buzza WHO?
- 13 Tom Lonergan COOKED
- 14 Joel Selwood (c) SOOK
- 15 Matthew Hayball WHO?
- 16 Scott Selwood SPUD
- 18 Josh Cowan MEDIOCRE
- 19 Mitch Clark COOKED
- 20 Ryan Gardner WHO?
- 21 Jordan Murdoch SPUD
- 22 Mitch Duncan MEDIOCRE
- 23 Josh Caddy MEDIOCRE
- 24 Jed Bews SPUD
- 25 Lachie Henderson SPUD
- 26 Tom Hawkins OBESE
- 27 Sam Menegola FUTURE AA
- 28 Cory Gregson SPUD
- 29 Cameron Guthrie MEDIOCRE
- 30 Nathan Vardy INJURY RIDDLED
- 31 Jordan Cunico WHO?
- 32 Steven Motlop GONESKIS
- 33 George Horlin-Smith SPUD
- 35 Patrick Dangerfield SHIT KICK
- 37 Michael Luxford WHO?
- 39 Shane Kersten GONESKIS
- 40 Jackson Thurlow MEDIOCRE
- 46 Mark Blicavs ONE YEAR WONDER
- 34 James Parsons WHO?
- 36 Tom Ruggles SPUD
t...tommy i...s that you?Just because Hawkins would split you in half if you were ever unlucky enough to be r4ped by him doesn't mean he's obese
t...tommy i...s that you?
comprehension 101I know right. He basically said he'd rather see Geelong lose than see his own team win. Obsession #101.
2008 GF- wing, game in the balance.I don't know who's is a better effort.
Rioli for the mark, or the photographer for being good enough to get a shot of him doing something against the cats.
You said Geelong losing is the next best thing to Hawf losing. Hardly my university's fault if you can't express yourself properly now is it...comprehension 101
were you educated at Deakin?
...so you were educated at Deakin?You said Geelong losing is the next best thing to Hawf losing. Hardly my university's fault if you can't express yourself properly now is it...
Nope, but I understand why you're trying really hard to deflect from the point now....so you were educated at Deakin?
****ing love this, made my day in fact.By the way, there is no way I'm putting the words "cyrils tackle" into Google.
I'm just trying to ascertain from where your lack of basic comprehension is derived. I never once remotely implied a Hawthorn loss as the preferable outcome, merely that with the benefit of hindsight, perhaps Geelong's qualifying final victory over Hawthorn contributed to their demise due to lack of continuity. I find Geelong's demise satisfying.Nope, but I understand why you're really trying hard to deflect from the point now.
Dank "fuelled us" (translation: supplied the quite legal drug actovegin) in 2009.
No but you said the next best thing to a hawf loss is a Geelong loss. Or are you now changing your mind..?I'm just trying to ascertain from where your lack of basic comprehension is derived. I never once remotely implied a Hawthorn loss as the preferable outcome, merely that with the benefit of hindsight, perhaps Geelong's qualifying final victory over Hawthorn contributed to their demise due to lack of continuity. I find Geelong's demise satisfying.
I think I understand where you're getting confused. In reply to your assertion that Hawthorn's qualifying loss was a "win" I stated it wasn't a win, however since it contributed to Geelong's ultimate failure it's "the next best thing."No but you said the next best thing to a hawf loss is a Geelong loss. Or are you now changing your mind..?
He supplied one legal drug in 2009, but that doesn't mean that's all he did.