3 recent flags but the Cats are nearly as broke as Brisbane. Why?


  • Total voters
    371

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
That old chestnut. Threads wouldn't make it to part 3 if Hawks could let things go. Seems to be beyond the majority.
Well they do have an axe to grind with the league as a whole for not giving them more than that old rust bucket Waverley when they really needed a place to call home...

To think the governing body only wanted a single dollar to offload that tin can shows how valuable it is so it's no wonder the HFC got angry after reading the fine print once the deal was done... :p
 
Last edited:
In light of recent evidence it looks like the Hawfs aren't so squeaky clean as they like to think.

0802-afl-finances-729.jpg


Chappyuk can a thread possibly get a meltdown prefix plus a backfire tag slapped on it of good measure?

lol, these hawfs really are something else... :oops:
 

Log in to remove this ad.

In light of recent evidence it looks like the Hawfs aren't so squeaky clean as they like to think.

0802-afl-finances-729.jpg


Chappyuk can a thread possibly get a meltdown prefix plus a backfire tag slapped on it of good measure?

lol, these hawfs really are something else... :oops:

More begging form from that guy who likes Geelong and all round BF blogger guy emoji master ....
 
In light of recent evidence it looks like the Hawfs aren't so squeaky clean as they like to think.

0802-afl-finances-729.jpg


Chappyuk can a thread possibly get a meltdown prefix plus a backfire tag slapped on it of good measure?

lol, these hawfs really are something else... :oops:

You obviously haven't seen this new automated feature.

IMG_20160225_222907.jpg
 
So your confident of the Hawks doing a #fourgasm this year then?
It would be pretty embarrassing for them to defend their club this far and making this thread what it is if they weren't...

...just sayin'. :cool:
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

That old chestnut. Threads wouldn't make it to part 3 if Hawks could let things go. Seems to be beyond the majority.

The old chestnut is the collective obsession. It's embarrassing for you guys that you've lost your shit over one player just because he was a young teenager who showed your lazy campaigners how it's done on Grand Final day.
 
The old chestnut is the collective obsession. It's embarrassing for you guys that you've lost your shit over one player just because he was a young teenager who showed your lazy campaigners how it's done on Grand Final day.

Not as bad as your embarrassing individual obsession with Geelong players.
 
Not as bad as your embarrassing individual obsession with Geelong players.

It's embarrassing because you all have it. It's gone through the handbagger cheersquad like a recessive gene.

There's no obsession with players on my part, in the past I studied the overrating of the overrated Bartel, but that puzzle has been solved now and I think people now realise that he is a hack.
 
It would be pretty embarrassing for them to defend their club this far and making this thread what it is if they weren't...

...just sayin'. :cool:

I'm a realist, Hawks are no better a chance to win this year than a handful of other teams. Going back to back, 3 Peat is hard enough. There could easily be up to 6 teams that are as good as the Hawks This season.
If they manage it they would undisputed to be the greatest ever in the history of the sport.
Look at Geelong for an example, great team not able to back it up.
Reduced pre-seasons, perhaps lack of motivation and fatigue are all factors that make a B2B so hard. You only need to look at the Hawks start to 2015, and their at times inconsistent performances to gauge just how hard it is.
Hence why B2B wins, 3 Peats earn the title and recognition of Dynasty.
 
Why were Geelong never good enough to go B2B? Let alone trying for 4 straight.
4 straight..?
C'mon, you and I both know the hawfs should be gunning for at least their 5th this year. Hell if what Jeff said was true about you flogs winning 2011 if only you'd been there then you should be going for a 6peat.

lol such underachievers... :$
 
4 straight..?
C'mon, you and I both know the hawfs should be gunning for at least their 5th this year. Hell if what Jeff said was true about you flogs winning 2011 if only you'd been there then you should be going for a 6peat.

lol such underachievers... :$

There's no need to be cynical about the perception we beat Geelong when it matters, we have a proven track record in that regard, and we showed it again in 2013.
 
4 straight..?
C'mon, you and I both know the hawfs should be gunning for at least their 5th this year. Hell if what Jeff said was true about you flogs winning 2011 if only you'd been there then you should be going for a 6peat.

lol such underachievers... :$

By that reasoning then you've put the last nail in the coffin of so the called Geelong Dynasty

Good work BF blogger / emoji master
 
Theyre still quite embarrassed the youngest team ever to win a GF stopped them going B2B Danked up and all

I wouldn't say that. No one has proven that Hawthorn [injunction] yet.

Also, I like your Avatar. It's terrific to think that you define yourself by reference to Geelong.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top