Rumour gerard whateley gets his ass handed to him.

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Covertackle

Premiership Player
Jan 26, 2012
3,963
2,217
Ipswich
AFL Club
Brisbane Lions
Other Teams
Melbourne Dees
david king showed up whateleys hypocrisy by highlighting that whateley demands (innocent till proven guilty) milne be suspended, but also demanded drug taker Essendon captain Jobe Watson who has admitted that he took an illegal drug the year he won a brownlow., can keep playing!!

whateley didnt try and defend his position, he just looked pissed off. hypocrisy is his own fault. as an observer, i like king, expect more from a high profile mouthpiece..
 
Gerard Whateley said he feels that Jobe should be able to play, he didn't demand it. You just made that up buddy. He said he has conflicting thoughts when he compares the situation to what would happen if it was the tour de france we were talking about instead of an AFL game
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #3
Gerard Whateley said he feels that Jobe should be able to play, he didn't demand it. You just made that up buddy. He said he has conflicting thoughts when he compares the situation to what would happen if it was the tour de france we were talking about instead of an AFL game

one is innocent till proven guilty, but he sacrifices him...

one is guilty but he gives him a pardon..

hypocrite!!
 

Log in to remove this ad.

david king showed up whateleys hypocrisy by highlighting that whateley demands (innocent till proven guilty) milne be suspended, but also demanded drug taker Essendon captain Jobe Watson who has admitted that he took an illegal drug the year he won a brownlow., can keep playing!!

whateley didnt try and defend his position, he just looked pissed off. hypocrisy is his own fault. as an observer, i like king, expect more from a high profile mouthpiece..

Seriously, how dumb can you be? There is a reason why Watson hasn't be charged with anything yet. Obviously there is conjecture over if AOD is actually illegal. How about you do some damn research. ASADA is arguing that AOD is banned under the s0 catch all clause which states drugs without therapeutic use approval in Australia are banned.

However, as only a minority of people have pointed out (those who do their own research rather than following the newspapers and t.v like sheep (AOD DOES have therapeutic use approval. You can get AOD prescribed through a doctor which then must be administered by an compound chemist.

Essendon will also argue that AOD is NOT a PED and if you study the drug itself you will find it is NOT a Performance Enhancing Drug.

The investigation has taken so long because it is not black and white...most drugs in sport issues are not black and white. WADA makes it this way (as a result many sporting codes in the world have nothing to do with WADA because generally they are considered a joke.

I have no idea why I persist trying to educate you people.
 
david king showed up whateleys hypocrisy by highlighting that whateley demands (innocent till proven guilty) milne be suspended, but also demanded drug taker Essendon captain Jobe Watson who has admitted that he took an illegal drug the year he won a brownlow., can keep playing!!

whateley didnt try and defend his position, he just looked pissed off. hypocrisy is his own fault. as an observer, i like king, expect more from a high profile mouthpiece..

It's hard to make a comment, without knowing which part of the post is the rumour:rolleyes:
 
you are a failed teacher....

"those that can, do. those that cant, teach...."

"those that cant teach.....hahahaha!!!"

Don't confuse my teaching abilities with your inability to think.
 
one is innocent till proven guilty, but he sacrifices him...

one is guilty but he gives him a pardon..

hypocrite!!

One has been charged with a criminal offence, the other hasn't been charged with anything. He did say that he would have to re-examine his position once (if) Watson was served with an infraction notice. To say one is guilty already is wrong
 
Seriously, how dumb can you be? There is a reason why Watson hasn't be charged with anything yet. Obviously there is conjecture over if AOD is actually illegal. How about you do some damn research. ASADA is arguing that AOD is banned under the s0 catch all clause which states drugs without therapeutic use approval in Australia are banned.

However, as only a minority of people have pointed out (those who do their own research rather than following the newspapers and t.v like sheep (AOD DOES have therapeutic use approval. You can get AOD prescribed through a doctor which then must be administered by an compound chemist.

Essendon will also argue that AOD is NOT a PED and if you study the drug itself you will find it is NOT a Performance Enhancing Drug.

The investigation has taken so long because it is not black and white...most drugs in sport issues are not black and white. WADA makes it this way (as a result many sporting codes in the world have nothing to do with WADA because generally they are considered a joke.

I have no idea why I persist trying to educate you people.
If Essendon argue its not performance enhancing then why use it? To enhance image?
 
david king showed up whateleys hypocrisy by highlighting that whateley demands (innocent till proven guilty) milne be suspended, but also demanded drug taker Essendon captain Jobe Watson who has admitted that he took an illegal drug the year he won a brownlow., can keep playing!!

whateley didnt try and defend his position, he just looked pissed off. hypocrisy is his own fault. as an observer, i like king, expect more from a high profile mouthpiece..

Whaaaat? It's already been explained about the so called hypocrisy, so I won't go on. As for the silence, he was being the bigger man and letting it go. He is clearly right and whilst I do like David King, his intelligence was shown up on this occasion. Whately had wasted enough breath on the matter and saw no cause to continue.
 
Seriously, how dumb can you be? There is a reason why Watson hasn't be charged with anything yet. Obviously there is conjecture over if AOD is actually illegal. How about you do some damn research. ASADA is arguing that AOD is banned under the s0 catch all clause which states drugs without therapeutic use approval in Australia are banned.

However, as only a minority of people have pointed out (those who do their own research rather than following the newspapers and t.v like sheep (AOD DOES have therapeutic use approval. You can get AOD prescribed through a doctor which then must be administered by an compound chemist.

Essendon will also argue that AOD is NOT a PED and if you study the drug itself you will find it is NOT a Performance Enhancing Drug.

The investigation has taken so long because it is not black and white...most drugs in sport issues are not black and white. WADA makes it this way (as a result many sporting codes in the world have nothing to do with WADA because generally they are considered a joke.

I have no idea why I persist trying to educate you people.

Thanks James.;)

While you're here, could you perhaps tell us all why AOD was in fact injected into your boys continuously, if it truly wasn't for any sort of performance enhancement capabilities?

Also, can you also explain why players are sat out of games for incurring a strike as part of the illicit drugs policy, yet admitting to taking a WADA banned substance gets zero response from the AFL?
 
Seriously, how dumb can you be? There is a reason why Watson hasn't be charged with anything yet. Obviously there is conjecture over if AOD is actually illegal. How about you do some damn research. ASADA is arguing that AOD is banned under the s0 catch all clause which states drugs without therapeutic use approval in Australia are banned.

However, as only a minority of people have pointed out (those who do their own research rather than following the newspapers and t.v like sheep (AOD DOES have therapeutic use approval. You can get AOD prescribed through a doctor which then must be administered by an compound chemist.

Essendon will also argue that AOD is NOT a PED and if you study the drug itself you will find it is NOT a Performance Enhancing Drug.

The investigation has taken so long because it is not black and white...most drugs in sport issues are not black and white. WADA makes it this way (as a result many sporting codes in the world have nothing to do with WADA because generally they are considered a joke.

I have no idea why I persist trying to educate you people.


Care to name the doctor who prescribed it?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Seriously, how dumb can you be? There is a reason why Watson hasn't be charged with anything yet. Obviously there is conjecture over if AOD is actually illegal. How about you do some damn research. ASADA is arguing that AOD is banned under the s0 catch all clause which states drugs without therapeutic use approval in Australia are banned.

However, as only a minority of people have pointed out (those who do their own research rather than following the newspapers and t.v like sheep (AOD DOES have therapeutic use approval. You can get AOD prescribed through a doctor which then must be administered by an compound chemist.

Essendon will also argue that AOD is NOT a PED and if you study the drug itself you will find it is NOT a Performance Enhancing Drug.

The investigation has taken so long because it is not black and white...most drugs in sport issues are not black and white. WADA makes it this way (as a result many sporting codes in the world have nothing to do with WADA because generally they are considered a joke.

I have no idea why I persist trying to educate you people.
Is that you David Evens?
 
Thanks James.;)

While you're here, could you perhaps tell us all why AOD was in fact injected into your boys continuously, if it truly wasn't for any sort of performance enhancement capabilities?

Also, can you also explain why players are sat out of games for incurring a strike as part of the illicit drugs policy, yet admitting to taking a WADA banned substance gets zero response from the AFL?
Hammer, nail, head.
 
Seriously, how dumb can you be? There is a reason why Watson hasn't be charged with anything yet. Obviously there is conjecture over if AOD is actually illegal. How about you do some damn research. ASADA is arguing that AOD is banned under the s0 catch all clause which states drugs without therapeutic use approval in Australia are banned.

However, as only a minority of people have pointed out (those who do their own research rather than following the newspapers and t.v like sheep (AOD DOES have therapeutic use approval. You can get AOD prescribed through a doctor which then must be administered by an compound chemist.

Essendon will also argue that AOD is NOT a PED and if you study the drug itself you will find it is NOT a Performance Enhancing Drug.

The investigation has taken so long because it is not black and white...most drugs in sport issues are not black and white. WADA makes it this way (as a result many sporting codes in the world have nothing to do with WADA because generally they are considered a joke.

I have no idea why I persist trying to educate you people.


I assume your astonishing knowledge is garnered from this

http://www.evaluategroup.com/Universal/View.aspx?type=Story&id=419857

which clearly states it is not approved for human therapeutic use. It is considered as safe orally or topically because when administered that way it has no effect (or the same level of effect as eating steak or rubbing it on your skin). Subcutaneous injections on the other hand are not covered by the FDA or this document. It is not possible to categorically state it is not a PED because that claim has not been tested. That's the whole reason for S0.

My bill for your tuition fee is in the mail.
 
Milne has been charged. Watson not yet. Rape is worse than ped.

Totally different.
 
Seriously, how dumb can you be? There is a reason why Watson hasn't be charged with anything yet. Obviously there is conjecture over if AOD is actually illegal. How about you do some damn research. ASADA is arguing that AOD is banned under the s0 catch all clause which states drugs without therapeutic use approval in Australia are banned.

However, as only a minority of people have pointed out (those who do their own research rather than following the newspapers and t.v like sheep (AOD DOES have therapeutic use approval. You can get AOD prescribed through a doctor which then must be administered by an compound chemist.

Essendon will also argue that AOD is NOT a PED and if you study the drug itself you will find it is NOT a Performance Enhancing Drug.

The investigation has taken so long because it is not black and white...most drugs in sport issues are not black and white. WADA makes it this way (as a result many sporting codes in the world have nothing to do with WADA because generally they are considered a joke.

I have no idea why I persist trying to educate you people.


hang on spike i thought it was only vitamin b&c???
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top