Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wish Oliver would’ve come but not to be.
By memory one had a shot and missed a sitter too.Over rated by some that are draft pundits.
I can’t see what the hoopla is all about TBH.
Plenty of others that are better and availability should be ok later on.
There’s a Bendigo lad that I think we’ve inquired about.
He ran a very good 2K so I doubt he is a forwardline guy only. We do like guys who can cover ground.
Good to talk to someone level headed!I think I’ve maintained all along at the end of the day, we all know Bailey is worth more than the 17 that was traded but it’d be foolish of Geelong to offer anymore considering the very small risk involved with getting him at that pick in the draft, you don’t win premierships with pleasantries so expecting anymore was foolish.
Trading Smith and Macrae for Kennedy and pick 17, then fleecing North for pick 25 for Caleb Daniel all the while saving 1.6m in salary cap space is probably a good result in the end.
It’s been very pleasant in this thread over the last few weeks. Thanks for all the welcoming chats and wish you all a happy off season!
Yes you can. It's a win.It completely depends on the contract.
you cannot assess the acquisition without knowing how much we are paying.
He is definitely in Wells' wheelhouse. Late bloomer due to the medical degree. Smashes the combine. There is upside potential there that Wells likes to gamble on.
I can't say I sit through a lot of Richmond VFL games and highlights revolving around goals can be a bit misleading but a lot of what he does is lead/mark/goal from what I have seen of him.
So if we gave Smith a 7 year deal at $1m+ per annum you still like the trade?Yes you can. It's a win.
Could come in to pick 42, where we once picked up local carpenter and my own personal jesus Tom Stewartimagine we hit this single pick lawson humphrey style.
That’s my rationale as well. Next years draft is a bit ho hum - all the good kids are academy kids - so I’d be all for trading our FF in a Holmes scenario.
What Key Forwards are around the pick 40s mark?
Everyone is applauding. I don’t get it at all. They just moved out 4 of the best 5 players on their list out. There is f all talent left, outside of Taranto, Hopper, Lynch and Balta. The majority of their picks are in that danger zone, where if draft evals don’t plan out, youre left with a whole crop of Billie smedts type players. History has proven time and time again, you can’t blow a list up and expect a group of 1st or 2nd yr players to shoulder the load. It will be 4-5 years before they are competitive, and that’s if they nail picks, and not screw their development by expecting too much too soon.Boy O Boy that Richmond draft hand looks very similar to Norfs the past few years and that of the Giants and the Suns of years past.
Gonna be a real messy couple of years for those at Punt Road.
To me Hotton screams Wells… he was in the discussion for top ten …then he did his knee. ..so do take the risk. Watching Ashcroft sort tells me that its probably something worth considering…
..but really we dont even know if we can get a trade yet.. If it doesnt happen then maybe we go the next clip… someon in that next group ..and we trade our future R2 for something in the middle. Clubs up north will want R1s and r2..cause R3’s and back are worth less ..
Mackie takes the poker no blinking thing seriously don’t he?
So if we gave Smith a 7 year deal at $1m+ per annum you still like the trade?
Salary cap flexibility is more valuable than draft picks. Just ask Melbourne.
Would love Hotton, just got to hope he slides a bit and someone's willing enough.To me Hotton screams Wells… he was in the discussion for top ten …then he did his knee. ..so do take the risk. Watching Ashcroft sort tells me that its probably something worth considering…
..but really we dont even know if we can get a trade yet.. If it doesnt happen then maybe we go the next clip… someon in that next group ..and we trade our future R2 for something in the middle. Clubs up north will want R1s and r2..cause R3’s and back are worth less ..
Are the Whitlock boys any good?
I watched a U18 champs game and they hardly touched it.
I think Hotton unfortunately will be taken before we get an opportunity to trade our FF. He’s absolute quality and would have been imo a top 4 pick if he hadn’t done his knee. Richmond with all those picks should use one on him.
I’ll have to give it some thought who I’d trade our FF for… I assume unless the Tigers now bunch some picks together to move up we could potentially trade it for around pick 23?
I could live with that contract. 5 years is too many, but 4 is ok.The contract talk that was floated was he was only on 700 on about 4 or 5 years… Im sure it will be reported at some stage…. Id think 700 would be surprising moderate with the cap going up ..
Would love Hotton, just got to hope he slides a bit and someone's willing enough.
Problem is, we're paying a bit of a tax here with nobody rating the 2025 draft + clubs loving the 2024 draft + our expected finishing position.
No matter how pessimistic some of us may be going into '25, the reality is the wise guys have us tied third favourites for the flag, and I assume clubs would feel similarly.
Regardless, any club predicted to finish in the eight with next year's compromised crop will be fighting an uphill battle to get back in.
We may have to 'overpay' at least by the optics, but the deal lives and dies by the quality of the player in reality.
I could live with that contract. 5 years is too many, but 4 is ok.
But until we know we don’t know.
My point is - everyone gets so much excited about the pick cost but that is the least important cost of the acquisition.
Losing a draft pick will not derail a list building strategy. Signing a player to an albatross contract can.
ShadowCat Whitlock actually makes a lot of sense.
Let him develop in the VFL until Jez hangs them up, and either be a plug and play partner to Neale, or Neale replacement if he doesn't kick on as hoped.
Some won't like it, and that's fine, but it does sound like something we would do.
We would've built our spine through the draft
- SDK
- JHenry
- COS
- Conway/Edwards
- Whitlock
- Neale
While adding the finishing touches through trades and shrewd drafting (O Henry, Humphries, Holmes, Smith, Bruhn).
Might not all work out, as nothing is a guarantee, but you can at least see what the idea would be there.
Like all of us, he is trapped by the consequences of his own decisionsWhere's Oliver?