SugarShane
C12 H22 O11
"We swear, we could drop him whenever we want. It's just that it's a rough time and we need that bit of experience to get us through."We need to hold an intervention for the club
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
EUFA EURO 2024 - Group Stage ⚽ EPL 24/25 starts Aug 17
"We swear, we could drop him whenever we want. It's just that it's a rough time and we need that bit of experience to get us through."We need to hold an intervention for the club
To be fair he had some very good games this year so he is a good 22nd player in a team aiming to play finals but not when we are rebuilding, he should playing in the SANFL and helping the younger players as there isn't enough experience players in our reserve side right now.After all these years though, I’ve finally understood the “logic” behind his continued selection.
The club has banged on about elite standards for so long. And obviously the one area Mackay is elite at is training / preparation. I imagine he is the guy that’s first to the club in the morning and last to leave at night. Gives 100% effort on the training track. Eats healthier than anyone else.
These are all admirable things but they just don’t compensate for the fact that he just isn’t physically skilled enough to be good.
The club has continually painted itself into a corner by sprouting a requirement for elite standards. In order to send a message to the younger players, they feel compelled to play Mackay because he epitomises those standards. Regardless of being a sh*te footballer!
Running backwards one way and the handball coming at your feet on the other side, that's certainly not easy to grab a hold of. If it was one of our love child players nothing would be said.Lol. It was not a difficult handball to take hold of. Sure it could have been perfect to his chest if the Collingwood player wasn’t in front of Jones.
It was a classic Mackay fumble. I’d back 80-90% of players to take it.
He knows his limited skill, should have stopped running backward. Does he think he is Andrew McLeod?Running backwards one way and the handball coming at your feet on the other side, that's certainly not easy to grab a hold of. If it was one of our love child players nothing would be said.
And I agree, he's played 150 games more than he would have but outside of the ball remaining in and the second effort, not much to look at.
It really need to be to the left of Mackay but instead it's ended up on his right and right down at his feet, really hard to expect Mackay to gather that cleanly.
Would like to see the footage just before as I half recall Jones running himself into trouble but if he didn't and that's all he could do, then I don't think we can fault Mackay too much for running backwards one way, the ball coming the other side at his ankles and not taking it cleanly.
It really need to be to the left of Mackay but instead it's ended up on his right and right down at his feet, really hard to expect Mackay to gather that cleanly.
Would like to see the footage just before as I half recall Jones running himself into trouble but if he didn't and that's all he could do, then I don't think we can fault Mackay too much for running backwards one way, the ball coming the other side at his ankles and not taking it cleanly.
It couldn't be to the left of Mackay because of the opposition player
If he gets it on a platter under zero pressure he's fine, anything else he can't handle
No one would run facing the other way as they lose their entire vision of what is around them. The fault is that the handball fell too short.
I would have expected most players to fumble that, the only difference is Mackay in his Mackayness managed to fumble it and keep it in play.
Lol. It was not a difficult handball to take hold of. Sure it could have been perfect to his chest if the Collingwood player wasn’t in front of Jones.
It was a classic Mackay fumble. I’d back 80-90% of players to take it.
To be fair he had some very good games this year so he is a good 22nd player in a team aiming to play finals but not when we are rebuilding, he should playing in the SANFL and helping the younger players as there isn't enough experience players in our reserve side right now.
He was good against GWS and Melbourne and had reasonable games against the Tigers, Eagle and Sydney, the R50 tell me he played in the defence for most of the season and not on the wing but seem to be playing forward more in the last few weeks. Given yesterday's game he should be dropped on form.no he hasn't. He's been good once, passable once. crap every other game. We'll never go anywhere whilst we have a culture that selects him. It's been proven in the past and it will remain going forward.
He was good against GWS and Melbourne and had reasonable games against the Tigers, Eagle and Sydney, the R50 tell me he played in the defence for most of the season and not on the wing but seem to be playing forward more in the last few weeks. Given yesterday's game he should be dropped on form.
View attachment 1148406
He wasn't playing as a midfielder which is why I told you he was playing in defence with those R50 numbers but only recently moved to play forward and again not in the midfield. I looked them up because I remember he played more than 1 good and 1 passable game like you said, maybe you really need to learn a bit about footy because you seem to lack understanding of the position MacKay has been playing and Sholl wasn't pushed out for MacKay since he's been in the side since round 7.That's a terribly low bar you're setting for a +80% TOG midfielder. The stats themselves are totally embarrassing, let alone his actual impact with such paucity. I really don't understand why you'd post those numbers in support of your argument that he's been better than ok in more than 2 games. You really need to learn a bit about footy.
He wasn't playing as a midfielder which is why I told you he was playing in defence with those R50 numbers but only recently moved to play forward and again not in the midfield. I looked them up because I remember he played more than 1 good and 1 passable game like you said, maybe you really need to learn a bit about footy because you seem to lack understanding of the position MacKay has been playing and Sholl wasn't pushed out for MacKay since he's been in the side since round 7.
Even 50m kicks to his chest have been known to knock the little fella over though.Might not have been the easiest collect, but the game is full of those. And there's a difference between not collecting it and nearly falling over. And it's not like the line of travel deviated, it was really a rudimentary collect. If it was from a 50m kick, yeh, difficult. But it was an 8m handball FFS.
He wasn't playing as a midfielder which is why I told you he was playing in defence with those R50 numbers but only recently moved to play forward and again not in the midfield. I looked them up because I remember he played more than 1 good and 1 passable game like you said, maybe you really need to learn a bit about footy because you seem to lack understanding of the position MacKay has been playing and Sholl wasn't pushed out for MacKay since he's been in the side since round 7.
What? My comment was we didn't push Sholl out to play MacKay like he said we did because MacKay was already in the side since round 7playing in defence for most the season and apologies I meant moved him to play in the wing recently and not forward.Wow.
Watch the last 3 games again.
Mackay starts every centre bounce on the wing.