- Oct 16, 2007
- 10,648
- 19
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- IC, SAC (Titans), EC, Daredevils
Goodes' 70 or so carry over points expired in Round 5, and he gets 93-odd from this reprimand. Answer your question?
-
LIVE: Sydney v Brisbane Lions - 2:30PM AEST Sat
Squiggle tips Lions at 61% chance -- What's your tip? -- Ticketing Buy, Sell -- Teams on Thurs »
-
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Grand Final
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Round PF Winner: Still Me
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Goodes - surely must go this time
- Thread starter Gavin Excell
- Start date
- Tagged users None
Re: Adam Goodes offered a reprimand
Oh yeah! the system gets one right for a change.
Come all ye whinging mexicans with huge chips on your shoulder and have a good sook!
It was a bullshit report. A free kick for high contact was all it warranted.
Oh yeah! the system gets one right for a change.
Come all ye whinging mexicans with huge chips on your shoulder and have a good sook!
It was a bullshit report. A free kick for high contact was all it warranted.
Re: Adam Goodes offered a reprimand
MRP: Explain yourself Adam.
Goodes: I honestly thought it was Hunter.
MRP: Fair enough, then we'll let you off with a warning.
Goodes: Thanks!
MRP: Just make sure next time that it actually IS Hunter!
Really is a bit of a joke he got off with a reprimand. Rather lucky.
MRP: Explain yourself Adam.
Goodes: I honestly thought it was Hunter.
MRP: Fair enough, then we'll let you off with a warning.
Goodes: Thanks!
MRP: Just make sure next time that it actually IS Hunter!
Really is a bit of a joke he got off with a reprimand. Rather lucky.
Re: Adam Goodes offered a reprimand
so excited about this
Goodes and Hally next week its going 2 be a good game
so excited about this
Goodes and Hally next week its going 2 be a good game
Re: Adam Goodes offered a reprimand
It's not "in" NSW but it could be classed as inside it
It's not "in" NSW but it could be classed as inside it
Re: Adam Goodes offered a reprimand
No, it's inside the ACT. It's a Melbourne home game, they would have had it at any AFL sanctioned ground they liked.
No, it's inside the ACT. It's a Melbourne home game, they would have had it at any AFL sanctioned ground they liked.
Re: Adam Goodes offered a reprimand
obviously i am the only one here with the law degree.
negligent - when you are completely unaware that you could be doing something that could impact on someone else
reckless - when you consider the possibility that your actions may affect someone but choose to do it anyway (the middle ground to intentional)
how goodes action is negligent is beyond me, he is looking at selwood, how can he not appreicate the fact that his actions could be reckless
un____ing believable, against port i saw free kicks that had my sydney mate laughing, the stuff he gets away with -
obviously i am the only one here with the law degree.
negligent - when you are completely unaware that you could be doing something that could impact on someone else
reckless - when you consider the possibility that your actions may affect someone but choose to do it anyway (the middle ground to intentional)
how goodes action is negligent is beyond me, he is looking at selwood, how can he not appreicate the fact that his actions could be reckless
un____ing believable, against port i saw free kicks that had my sydney mate laughing, the stuff he gets away with -
Re: Adam Goodes offered a reprimand
Hey PJ - if I can just get out of the corner for a second. If you read back you'll actually find that my point was not to compare the two incidents, but to make a remark against another poster who was saying that Goodes just 'bumped him to the head'.
Having said that, would you agree that in Murphy's incident he just 'bumped him to the head'?
If so, then there are some similarities.
Hey PJ - if I can just get out of the corner for a second. If you read back you'll actually find that my point was not to compare the two incidents, but to make a remark against another poster who was saying that Goodes just 'bumped him to the head'.
Having said that, would you agree that in Murphy's incident he just 'bumped him to the head'?
If so, then there are some similarities.
Re: Adam Goodes offered a reprimand
Here is one now. Mate, your hopeless team of girls is gonna get spanked next week.
Here is one now. Mate, your hopeless team of girls is gonna get spanked next week.
- May 29, 2008
- 5,959
- 1,460
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Watching Fremantle Lose
Re: Adam Goodes offered a reprimand
Did Selwood get cited for headbutting Goodes Hip?
I hope he wins the brownlow the dirty pig
Did Selwood get cited for headbutting Goodes Hip?
I hope he wins the brownlow the dirty pig
TheMase
Brownlow Medallist
Re: Adam Goodes offered a reprimand
Canberra is in the ACT.
But, I will humour you anyway.
We have 13 games a year 'inside of the state of NSW/ACT'.
You have 12 games as year 'inside of the state of WA'
Fremantle has 12.
Adelaide has 12.
Port Adelaide has 12.
Brisbane has 12.
The games at Manuka are paid for by the ACT government. The AFL schedules them there for the benefit of the clubs selling the games. This has nothing to do with the Sydney Swans. It has to do with the AFL assisting clubs with scheduling to find other revenue streams.
It is hardly a massive difference.
Whos making the idiotic comments? 6 away games and 5 home games is as fair as it gets. Especially after next week where it will be 6 home and 6 away. Idiotic comment
What isn't fair is that you leave NSW 3 times now in the last 11 games. Collingwood travels further than you for the rest of the season...
Canberra is a city inside NSW is it not?
Canberra is in the ACT.
But, I will humour you anyway.
We have 13 games a year 'inside of the state of NSW/ACT'.
You have 12 games as year 'inside of the state of WA'
Fremantle has 12.
Adelaide has 12.
Port Adelaide has 12.
Brisbane has 12.
The games at Manuka are paid for by the ACT government. The AFL schedules them there for the benefit of the clubs selling the games. This has nothing to do with the Sydney Swans. It has to do with the AFL assisting clubs with scheduling to find other revenue streams.
It is hardly a massive difference.
Re: Adam Goodes offered a reprimand
and another one. NM fans are the whingiest of all.
and another one. NM fans are the whingiest of all.
Miguel Sanchez
(Unique injury) TBC
Re: Adam Goodes offered a reprimand
So did the system get it right or did it only deserve a free kick? I'm confused.
So did the system get it right or did it only deserve a free kick? I'm confused.
Re: Adam Goodes offered a reprimand
He had intent to bump him, no one disputes that. The question is was it a negligent act to continue with the bump and risk hitting his head or reckless to do so. The ruling of negligent is consistent with the charges on Murphy and Waters etc.
He had intent to bump him, no one disputes that. The question is was it a negligent act to continue with the bump and risk hitting his head or reckless to do so. The ruling of negligent is consistent with the charges on Murphy and Waters etc.
Re: Adam Goodes offered a reprimand
well then if goodes appreciated that there was a possibilitly that in bumping him he could hit his head that is reckless
it is only negligent if he has basically no idea that by bumping him he is going to get him in the head
well then if goodes appreciated that there was a possibilitly that in bumping him he could hit his head that is reckless
it is only negligent if he has basically no idea that by bumping him he is going to get him in the head
Re: Adam Goodes offered a reprimand
So, mr lawyer man, explain why Murphy's contact was also deemed negligent.
So, mr lawyer man, explain why Murphy's contact was also deemed negligent.
Falchoon
Brownlow Medallist
- Feb 15, 2002
- 29,730
- 10,943
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
- Other Teams
- Bluestar Airlines, Anacott Steel
Re: Adam Goodes offered a reprimand
I'm in Sydney next weekend and in all honesty am struggling to get the motivation up to attend the footy.
a) My team is shyte and without heart, but.......
I am sick of the way the AFL is taking the sport, how in the hell does Steven Baker get 6+ matches and this bloke continually gets off, Hall on Maguire whne we played them in a prelim, concessions enough to pinch our players.
Enough is enough, let that club stand on its own 2 feet and treat all clubs equally.
I'm in Sydney next weekend and in all honesty am struggling to get the motivation up to attend the footy.
a) My team is shyte and without heart, but.......
I am sick of the way the AFL is taking the sport, how in the hell does Steven Baker get 6+ matches and this bloke continually gets off, Hall on Maguire whne we played them in a prelim, concessions enough to pinch our players.
Enough is enough, let that club stand on its own 2 feet and treat all clubs equally.
Re: Adam Goodes offered a reprimand
My team may be a rabble but at least i follow a real club. Sydney is a joke, with few 'supporters' that actually know anything about the game. You are not 'The Bloods', but merely the love child of the AFL, a relocated franchise.
My team may be a rabble but at least i follow a real club. Sydney is a joke, with few 'supporters' that actually know anything about the game. You are not 'The Bloods', but merely the love child of the AFL, a relocated franchise.
Re: Adam Goodes offered a reprimand
If that brush hurt Waters, then he shouldn't be playing football.
Tell Beau Waters that.
If that brush hurt Waters, then he shouldn't be playing football.
RussellEbertHandball
Flick pass expert
Re: Adam Goodes offered a reprimand
No carry forward points. Rd 5 2007 70.31pts hit on Godfrey ran out in Rd 5 this year.
No carry forward points. Rd 5 2007 70.31pts hit on Godfrey ran out in Rd 5 this year.
RussellEbertHandball
Flick pass expert
Re: Adam Goodes offered a reprimand
Correct. Not sure if lawyers needed, but the low impact and head high contact are correct.
Correct. Not sure if lawyers needed, but the low impact and head high contact are correct.
Re: Adam Goodes offered a reprimand
Just for the record, I think Adam Goodes is a terrific player and it was he who led the fightback that won them the game against my team. The shame of it is, the MRP has just made him, arguably, the most detested player in the competition. He was already considered a protected species.
I wouldn't mind betting the next time he makes anywhere near head high contact to an opponent, the player will stay down a little longer than necessary and Goodes will get rubbed out for something innocuous.
Justice? Tell it to the MRP. They've done our great game a disservice and effectively maligned a player who probably doesn't deserve the amount of shit he's getting on this thread. Consistency? pfft.. shame on you, MRP.
Just for the record, I think Adam Goodes is a terrific player and it was he who led the fightback that won them the game against my team. The shame of it is, the MRP has just made him, arguably, the most detested player in the competition. He was already considered a protected species.
I wouldn't mind betting the next time he makes anywhere near head high contact to an opponent, the player will stay down a little longer than necessary and Goodes will get rubbed out for something innocuous.
Justice? Tell it to the MRP. They've done our great game a disservice and effectively maligned a player who probably doesn't deserve the amount of shit he's getting on this thread. Consistency? pfft.. shame on you, MRP.
