Greene's One Week - Mabo, the Vibe, Justice

[neilk]

So who hears the appeal and when?
I so want this to be over.

I think it will be having more of an affect on GWS than it would be on us.

 

[Pie eyed]

Sam Murray being delisted would be tearing us part.....................................................................

 

[Matt_352]

They should have really punished Greene and taught him a lesson by suspending Jeremy Cameron for a week too.

Don't forget DeBoer

 

[Hong Kong Pie]

The worries and mental stress over appealing could be a real factor for GWS. Not the ideal prep for the team.

 

[BoxMatrix]

After watching this video, I have changed my mind, and am of the opinion that he did deserve a suspension for a week.

 

[jmac70]

Pure gold.

 

[jmac70]

He's an absolute certainty to get off, unfortunately.

Nope

 

[Capital Magpie]

As I understand they cant present any new evidence anyway. Only arguments are a mistake in law was made or no reasonable tribunal could have ever made this decision. No grounds here you would think for those

Playing Devil's Advocate, I would think GWS would be arguing that the Tribunal didn't act reasonably in the face of the evidence (player testimony and what GWS persist is saying inconclusive video footage), plus the Tribunal acted unreasonably because just last week the Tribunal fined Toby Green for arguably worse actions (= unreasonable).

Anderson will also, I suspect, point out that the Tribunal didn't give sufficient weight to his argument that if there was any contact, then it was reckless and not intentional. (That would be covered in the Tribunal's reasons for decision document, assuming that there is such a thing).

 

[unplugged]

Wear your goggles Pies players.

GWS are set to name Edward Scissorhands as Greene's replacement.

Is that Lachie Keeffe?

 

[Daicos Daze]

Nope

Should have got two weeks
Even Phil Carmen demands better resoect
Than the efforts of this Greene horses Hoof

 

[Pie eyed]

Playing Devil's Advocate, I would think GWS would be arguing that the Tribunal didn't act reasonably in the face of the evidence (player testimony and what GWS persist is saying inconclusive video footage), plus the Tribunal acted unreasonably because just last week the Tribunal fined Toby Green for arguably worse actions (= unreasonable).

Anderson will also, I suspect, point out that the Tribunal didn't give sufficient weight to his argument that if there was any contact, then it was reckless and not intentional. (That would be covered in the Tribunal's reasons for decision document, assuming that there is such a thing).

Since watching the video above I think GWS have less than a leg to stand on.
In fact I would be surprised if they did not extend the ban to more weeks.

 

[Daicos Daze]

Should have got two weeks
Even Phil Carmen demands better resoect
Than the efforts of this Greene horses Hoof

Respect

 

[Capital Magpie]

After watching this video, I have changed my mind, and am of the opinion that he did deserve a suspension for a week.

It's pretty damning footage and not inconclusive at all.

 

[Adz]

Since watching the video above I think GWS have less than a leg to stand on.
In fact I would be surprised if they did not extend the ban to more weeks.

GWS cannot argue the footage was inconclusive as they themselves used the footage to mount his defence.

 

[sideswipe]

So who hears the appeal and when?
I so want this to be over.

Afl appeals board. A bunch of lawyers. This isn’t about Greene’s charge now but more about things like whether the tribunal made an error. And given they let gws have Neale give evidence, the likely only potential errors were in favour of gws.


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[NeverWobble]

I think it will be having more of an affect on GWS than it would be on us.

Yep. I reckon we are a very composed group nowadays, will focus on the job at hand and prepare to play a pretty decent opposition.

 

[NeverWobble]

Afl appeals board. A bunch of lawyers. This isn’t about Greene’s charge now but more about things like whether the tribunal made an error. And given they let gws have Neale give evidence, the likely only potential errors were in favour of gws.


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

Thanks for that SideSwipe.

 

[3rdMan]

Afl appeals board. A bunch of lawyers. This isn’t about Greene’s charge now but more about things like whether the tribunal made an error. And given they let gws have Neale give evidence, the likely only potential errors were in favour of gws.


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

Broke the "conventions" of the tribunal to gather as much evidence as possible. The tribunal had rejected a request by Brisbane to call an oposition player when they were defending Andrews.

 

[sideswipe]

Agreed. You should go back to your Gentlemen’s Club with your other County Court judge mates and discuss your feelings.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sounds like someone is projecting


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[Kirby]

Where’s old mate Jonbe154 with all the conspiracy stuff. Past his bedtime?

 

[TradeDraft]

 

[Obese Arachnid]

Afl appeals board. A bunch of lawyers. This isn’t about Greene’s charge now but more about things like whether the tribunal made an error. And given they let gws have Neale give evidence, the likely only potential errors were in favour of gws.


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[TradeDraft]

I guess everyone want to make Eye Gouging Legal in the AFL?

 

[NonPhixion]

Neale is just respecting the player code. Watching the above video he’s 100% guilty

 

[Pragmatic Shill]

After watching this video, I have changed my mind, and am of the opinion that he did deserve a suspension for a week.

Surely the AFL uses this then?