GRFL Season 2013

Remove this Banner Ad

So who is going to play in the next three games?

Nully to get done this weekend by a much bigger Wakool
Nully to get bundled the following week by the inform Roos
 
Finals is a different game, I expect a mentally weak and undisciplined Wakool side to get a touch up from a quality experienced Maroons outfit this week.
Wakool may be bigger, but Nully have the best ruckman in the comp, also the hawks don't have the key defenders to stop big Egg and Oberdorfer.
The occasion and expectation will be too much for an Adam Pollock led team.
 
Goodknight said:
Finals is a different game, I expect a mentally weak and undisciplined Wakool side to get a touch up from a quality experienced Maroons outfit this week.
Wakool may be bigger, but Nully have the best ruckman in the comp, also the hawks don't have the key defenders to stop big Egg and Oberdorfer.
The occasion and expectation will be too much for an Adam Pollock led team.
Click to expand...
Mate your mentally weak and undisciplined do you actually know what your talking about this is meant to be a forum for discussion about football not your narrow minded biased commentary
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Wakool have done well, I expect them to sack there coach no matter what, considering all there players dislike him with a passion.
All I hear from them is what a pain he is.
 
Goodknight said:
Finals is a different game, I expect a mentally weak and undisciplined Wakool side to get a touch up from a quality experienced Maroons outfit this week.
Wakool may be bigger, but Nully have the best ruckman in the comp, also the hawks don't have the key defenders to stop big Egg and Oberdorfer.
The occasion and expectation will be too much for an Adam Pollock led team.
Click to expand...

Mate do you have any idea what you are talking about? not only did wakool win yesterday with kirkland hartshourn and hancock out, but this so called best ruckman in the comp got a touch up by Adam pollock, also if you had a look at the ladder it will show you that wakool have also had the LEAST points kicked against them in there %, so wouldn't that mean they have the best back line in the comp? :p :p

Also who ever number 22 is for wakool is an absolute superstar.:thumbsu::thumbsu::thumbsu::thumbsu::thumbsu:
 
eric swatson said:
Mate do you have any idea what you are talking about? not only did wakool win yesterday with kirkland hartshourn and hancock out, but this so called best ruckman in the comp got a touch up by Adam pollock, also if you had a look at the ladder it will show you that wakool have also had the LEAST points kicked against them in there %, so wouldn't that mean they have the best back line in the comp? :p :p

Also who ever number 22 is for wakool is an absolute superstar.:thumbsu::thumbsu::thumbsu::thumbsu::thumbsu:
Click to expand...
Well said mate Number 22 Corey Lowry is a gun shut Watts right out of the game when he went on to him and Ben Jones what a game he played.
 
Difficult to see anyone other than Wakool winning it now with the week off and Eric I presume the 3 guys you mentioned who missed the 2nd semi for Wakool will play in the big one?

As for Nully, very tough game coming up against Ultima who gave them a real touch up at Ultima only a few weeks back. My fingers are crossed that the Maroons can turn it around but who knows.
 
Hugh Jars said:
Difficult to see anyone other than Wakool winning it now with the week off and Eric I presume the 3 guys you mentioned who missed the 2nd semi for Wakool will play in the big one?

As for Nully, very tough game coming up against Ultima who gave them a real touch up at Ultima only a few weeks back. My fingers are crossed that the Maroons can turn it around but who knows.
Click to expand...

i would believe that the three guys are looking to get paid to show up
 
Dribble222 said:
Not sure how he can be playing elsewhere and still be able to play finals here.. Thought it only applies to vfl and tac cup players??
Click to expand...

I wonder what the process is here too. Hancock was cleared from the WAFL to Wakool, then cleared from Wakool to the North Pilbara Football League in Western Australia in June, where he played in the Grand Final Satdy just gone. How does this allow him to be able to play for Wakool in the Grand Final? I know he played the last 3 games of the year for Wakool, but I don't quite understand it. Can someone explain?
 
Footy Pie said:
I wonder what the process is here too. Hancock was cleared from the WAFL to Wakool, then cleared from Wakool to the North Pilbara Football League in Western Australia in June, where he played in the Grand Final Satdy just gone. How does this allow him to be able to play for Wakool in the Grand Final? I know he played the last 3 games of the year for Wakool, but I don't quite understand it. Can someone explain?
Click to expand...
Its because its a remote mining community some kind of vcfl rule i think
 
Hirdys Dealer said:
So who is going to play in the next three games?

Nully to get done this weekend by a much bigger Wakool
Nully to get bundled the following week by the inform Roos
Click to expand...

.....If I was a gambling man, I could afford a much more attractive girlfriend!

Now that finals have proved to be a very different game to the Home and Away, i'll take Ultima by 15 points in a close contest all day. Luke Wilson to receive BOG!
 
Will Wakool pay Kirkland to come back and play this weekend, that is the question on everyone's lips?!?!?! Sore back my arse, we all know what his like! League Medalists tonight and why? Nully Quinella with Kielgardie to win the seniors and Hayward to win the two's!
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

The facts are Hancock was given a local interchange permit which is for use only in the vcfl for tac and vfl players returning to their home clubs.The problem here is the sporting pulse system allowed the north pilbra league to use that permit.against the rules but allowed by the system.The only way Hancock will not play this week is if him and the Wakool football club have a good look in the mirror and realise its not worth the damage its doing to their club and the league
 
savagedog said:
The facts are Hancock was given a local interchange permit which is for use only in the vcfl for tac and vfl players returning to their home clubs.The problem here is the sporting pulse system allowed the north pilbra league to use that permit.against the rules but allowed by the system.The only way Hancock will not play this week is if him and the Wakool football club have a good look in the mirror and realise its not worth the damage its doing to their club and the league
Click to expand...
Mate obviously your from Ultima and your a bit worried about Hancock there has been an email sent to all clubs and Wakool has done nothing wrong and are within their rights to play him.
 
black caviar 66 said:
Mate obviously your from Ultima and your a bit worried about Hancock there has been an email sent to all clubs and Wakool has done nothing wrong and are within their rights to play him.
Click to expand...
you have missed the point black cav,this has nothing to do with this Saturday,this has been going on for 6-7 weeks now .I'm fairly sure you don't know the level of anger amongst the majority of clubs,the board and afl/vic over this issue.the loop hole in the system will be changed over the off season so this sorry saga doesn't happen again.
 
The
savagedog said:
you have missed the point black cav,this has nothing to do with this Saturday,this has been going on for 6-7 weeks now .I'm fairly sure you don't know the level of anger amongst the majority of clubs,the board and afl/vic over this issue.the loop hole in the system will be changed over the off season so this sorry saga doesn't happen again.
Click to expand...
The saying mountains out of molehills comes to mind
 
savagedog said:
you have missed the point black cav,this has nothing to do with this Saturday,this has been going on for 6-7 weeks now .I'm fairly sure you don't know the level of anger amongst the majority of clubs,the board and afl/vic over this issue.the loop hole in the system will be changed over the off season so this sorry saga doesn't happen again.
Click to expand...
 
savagedog said:
you have missed the point black cav,this has nothing to do with this Saturday,this has been going on for 6-7 weeks now .I'm fairly sure you don't know the level of anger amongst the majority of clubs,the board and afl/vic over this issue.the loop hole in the system will be changed over the off season so this sorry saga doesn't happen again.
Click to expand...
Han
savagedog said:
you have missed the point black cav,this has nothing to do with this Saturday,this has been going on for 6-7 weeks now .I'm fairly sure you don't know the level of anger amongst the majority of clubs,the board and afl/vic over this issue.the loop hole in the system will be changed over the off season so this sorry saga doesn't happen again.
Click to expand...


Hancock was never cleared from Wakool to WA he was playing over there on a type 2 permit. An agreement between two leagues that permits players of a club in one league to compete with another club in another league for the duration of the permit. This requires online approval by both clubs and both leagues involved. The GRFL approved this Type 2 permit, so where is the loop hole.
What consequence came out of the Reserves team in the finals that played a player not on the team sheet who kicked the first goal of the match. I wonder which player received his goal against their name?
Then there are the clubs who bring their senior players down to play in reserves for finals. We could just go on and on.
Lets just play footy. Good luck to all teams in the final.
 
Lets Play Footy said:
Han


Hancock was never cleared from Wakool to WA he was playing over there on a type 2 permit. An agreement between two leagues that permits players of a club in one league to compete with another club in another league for the duration of the permit. This requires online approval by both clubs and both leagues involved. The GRFL approved this Type 2 permit, so where is the loop hole.
What consequence came out of the Reserves team in the finals that played a player not on the team sheet who kicked the first goal of the match. I wonder which player received his goal against their name?
Then there are the clubs who bring their senior players down to play in reserves for finals. We could just go on and on.
Lets just play footy. Good luck to all teams in the final.
Click to expand...
The Type 2 local interchange permit that was used is not allowed to be used outside the vcfl/afl vic ,it is for tac/vfl players returning to their home clubs.The football manager of the grfl didn't check the "clearance" properly,if he had of,it would've been refused and port hedland would've had to put a proper clearance in.That is where the loop hole is, the sporting pulse system allows it even though it is against the rules.As far as the rest of your post goes, it is laughable to compare a genuine mistake on a team sheet to the situation with hancock.
 
savagedog said:
The Type 2 local interchange permit that was used is not allowed to be used outside the vcfl/afl vic ,it is for tac/vfl players returning to their home clubs.The football manager of the grfl didn't check the "clearance" properly,if he had of,it would've been refused and port hedland would've had to put a proper clearance in.That is where the loop hole is, the sporting pulse system allows it even though it is against the rules.As far as the rest of your post goes, it is laughable to compare a genuine mistake on a team sheet to the situation with hancock.
Click to expand...
Mate get over it let the footy do the talking good luck to both teams.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

GRFL Season 2013

Similar threads

H
  • Sticky
GRFL Discussion 2025
3 4 5 6 7
Replies
150
Views
19K
Oldfashionfootballer
O

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top