Club Focus GWS Giants 2021 - Brander, Callaghan, Aleer, Fahey

[daniel23]

You want to give us #5 and your future first for our #2 AND #13. That proposal is horrendous for GWS

Really? 5 this year plus a pick ranging from 1-7 next year. If Andrew or gibcus is your preference you could still get one of them at 5.

 

[Colonial]

Really? 5 this year plus a pick ranging from 1-7 next year. If Andrew or gibcus is your preference you could still get one of them at 5.

Yes really.
2 on its own. Maybe. Not both.

 

[Taylor Moss]

Really? 5 this year plus a pick ranging from 1-7 next year. If Andrew or gibcus is your preference you could still get one of them at 5.

There is no way known we go back 3 places and give you our other first rounder.

It makes zero sense from a Giants POV to do that trade.

 

[daniel23]

Yes really.
2 on its own. Maybe. Not both.

Yeh pass.

 

[Colonial]

Yeh pass.

I thought so.

 

[Taylor Moss]

I thought so.

Wonder why? Probably because it was a horrendously weighted to favour the Hawks?

 

[Colonial]

Wonder why? Probably because it was a horrendously weighted to favour the Hawks?

Would of been a ridiculous trade.
We lose pick 2 and 13 to get pick 5 and an unknown? No thanks.

 

[Burtman]

Would of been a ridiculous trade.
We lose pick 2 and 13 to get pick 5 and an unknown? No thanks.

Well if we’re being serious it’s probably 2 and 13 for two top 5 picks, not exactly weighted in our favour. Depends who u we’re going to take. If Callaghan then you wouldn’t do the deal, if it was gibcus or Andrew then you’re essentially getting the player you want but upgrading 13 to a top 5 pick next year.

 

[Colonial]

Well if we’re being serious it’s probably 2 and 13 for two top 5 picks, not exactly weighted in our favour. Depends who u we’re going to take. If Callaghan then you wouldn’t do the deal, if it was gibcus or Andrew then you’re essentially getting the player you want but upgrading 13 to a top 5 pick next year.

We are being serious and we have no idea where the Hawks finish next year.
No way we hand over 13 in that trade.

 

[Burtman]

We are being serious and we have no idea where the Hawks finish next year.
No way we hand over 13 in that trade.

Rebuilding, new coach, new gameplan, I’d imagine most would be tipping us for bottom 4. If we traded 5 and next years 1st for 2 I would burn down waverley

 

[Taylor Moss]

Well if we’re being serious it’s probably 2 and 13 for two top 5 picks, not exactly weighted in our favour. Depends who u we’re going to take. If Callaghan then you wouldn’t do the deal, if it was gibcus or Andrew then you’re essentially getting the player you want but upgrading 13 to a top 5 pick next year.

We have something you want.
You don’t get to break even here.

 

[Colonial]

Rebuilding, new coach, new gameplan, I’d imagine most would be tipping us for bottom 4. If we traded 5 and next years 1st for 2 I would burn down waverley

And we are the biggest fools if that’s what we go off.
I’m sure the Pies didn’t think they would finish 2nd last this season when they played this game.
So don’t trade? It’s a ridiculous trade for 2 of our definite 1st rounders (including Pick 2) for 5 and basically anything from 1 to 18.
We are fairly smart usually when trading picks so hopefully if this is presented we politely reply thanks but no thanks.

 

[Burtman]

We have something you want.
You don’t get to break even here.

It still wouldn’t be breaking even. And to be fair I wouldn’t do the deal even if you traded us 13. It’s a horrendous deal for us.

 

[Taylor Moss]

It still wouldn’t be breaking even. And to be fair I wouldn’t do the deal even if you traded us 13. It’s a horrendous deal for us.

Was a Hawks supporter who proposed it.

 

[GWS Goose]

I wonder what GWS' plan is for Fahey? Surely pick 53 won't be enough to match a bid.

Go into a rnd 2 or 3 (depending where he is picked) into 2022 draft.
We have all but confirmed we'll match with comments made.

 

[Burtman]

Was a Hawks supporter who proposed it.

Yeah I know, just saying personally I wouldn’t do it. If I was a gws supporter I’d definitely consider it depending on who you wanted to take this year. You made out like bandits trading with the pies and we’d likely be in the same position next year.

 

[Taylor Moss]

Yeah I know, just saying personally I wouldn’t do it. If I was a gws supporter I’d definitely consider it depending on who you wanted to take this year. You made out like bandits trading with the pies and we’d likely be in the same position next year.

If we give Pick 2 to you for 5 & next years first, then we haven’t made out like bandits at all.

No chance we even contemplate it.

 

[Orange Agent]

I wonder what GWS' plan is for Fahey? Surely pick 53 won't be enough to match a bid.

We will have a spare list spot so can use 71 as well and they will move up after Daicos and Darcy matched picks get taken out.

 

[Tulip]

Wonder why? Probably because it was a horrendously weighted to favour the Hawks?

Something in the region of picks 2 and 13 for picks 5 and 4 would be a great deal for GWS IMO.

 

[Taylor Moss]

Something in the region of picks 2 and 13 for picks 5 and 4 would be a great deal for GWS IMO.

Could be Picks 5 & 18.

The unknown quantity is the kicker.

 

[sydney_gws]

Who are gws supporters favouring for pick 2 ? Surely if it's not Callaghan sliding back makes sense. It's been floated on the Hawks board 5+future 1st for 2+13 could work for both parties and still gets gibcus or Andrew.

Probably not, we would get a better offer from Gold Coast I am sure.

 

[GWS Goose]

If we give Pick 2 to you for 5 & next years first, then we haven’t made out like bandits at all.

No chance we even contemplate it.

I think we'd consider that if we aren't big on Callaghan.
I don't think Hawthorne should turn to picks into 1.

 

[sydney_gws]

Well if we’re being serious it’s probably 2 and 13 for two top 5 picks, not exactly weighted in our favour. Depends who u we’re going to take. If Callaghan then you wouldn’t do the deal, if it was gibcus or Andrew then you’re essentially getting the player you want but upgrading 13 to a top 5 pick next year.

I think 2 for 5,21 is possible but only if we think Callaghan is a bit overrated by other clubs and oy a slightly better prospect than who we get at pick 5 ( 7 after Daicos, Darcy).
The other factor we might consider is trying to improve next years draft hand.
We might ask for the trade to be
2,Gws2022r3 for 5,24,hawthorn2022r2.

 

[Taylor Moss]

I think we'd consider that if we aren't big on Callaghan.
I don't think Hawthorne should turn to picks into 1.

I don’t think we should be selling the pick that low.

 

[Marcel Proust]

Surely gws do the right thing and bid on Darcy and diacos?