People voted No because they didn't believe it needed to be locked into the constitution forever and a day. It was just seen as a "feel good" exercise for the ALP and the left that was poorly planned and delivered.
Cmon Bicks.
I think you know it was more than just a “feel good” project.
A rushed over-reach? Sure. But the intentions behind the voice were pretty solid.
Unless you feel the campaign by the NO side didn’t attempt to muddy the waters with patently false narratives AND the YES campaign didn’t promise things that can’t be reasonably promised?
I’d be surprised if anyone but the hardest card carrying party shills couldn’t see the reality of the political mistakes and resultant targeting from both sides.
Every discussion involving politics doesn’t have to be so one sided in its thinking.
I’m guessing Albo will get lambasted for the tax changes by the same people who supported Howard’s breaking of non-core promises?
I’m guessing Albo will get a free pass regarding the tax changes from everyone who went nuts when Howard floated the idea of a non-core promise?
It’s quite a boring way to discuss what can otherwise be potentially interesting topics.
Unfortunately the only people who want to talk politics end up being the exact people that cannot have a balanced discussion. Everyone else is sick of where it always ends up.
So, by discussing politics I guess I have broken my own rule … now I’ve had my periodic contradictory hypercritical rant about the ranters … promise to stay out of the politics discussions for a while.