He will get off looks like absolutely nothing not enough force IMO. Selwood didn't even lose his footing.
If the cut was taped after he hit the dirt the first time, he wouldn't have had to leave after the bump.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
He will get off looks like absolutely nothing not enough force IMO. Selwood didn't even lose his footing.
Wouldn't it suck if he got two weeks and North made it to the GF...
Comedy gold that you think the AFL gives a flying **** about precedent.
Your right, just watched them both on AFL.com. It split open again when he turned his head as Harvey bumped. Didn't really hit him high, it's just the way Selwood turned. But the ball is not in the picture, how far off was it? To me that makes hits worse. But then several players have got away with it. Steven Johnson for one. Was very silly of boomer to do it if it wasn't within shepherding distance. That's why I get pissed off when snipers get off. Your not expecting it behind play, and everything behind play should be a higher penalty same could be Said against Selwood when he pushed whoever it was when the ball was over the boundary.
Gees, did anyone else play for the cats last night? Selwood was everywhere!
If the cut was taped after he hit the dirt the first time, he wouldn't have had to leave after the bump.
He, the way he lifted his elbow, how the hell did they let that go!
Spot on.Accidental head clash. Play on.
Your right, just watched them both on AFL.com. It split open again when he turned his head as Harvey bumped. Didn't really hit him high, it's just the way Selwood turned. But the ball is not in the picture, how far off was it? To me that makes hits worse. But then several players have got away with it. Steven Johnson for one. Was very silly of boomer to do it if it wasn't within shepherding distance. That's why I get pissed off when snipers get off. Your not expecting it behind play, and everything behind play should be a higher penalty same could be Said against Selwood when he pushed whoever it was when the ball was over the boundary.
Gees, did anyone else play for the cats last night? Selwood was everywhere!
Everyone cried with Fyfes bump and now we want to hang someone else for something similar. The MRP don't use precedents so there's hope for Boomer.
Well that's all a Tigers fan can get out of football these days.I'd be laughing.
Unless you are Franklin.The rule is clear, you elect to bump and make high contact you are gone.
Insufficient force will be the call. If selwood had gone to ground it would be a different story.
as for the "but fifye, precedent" the MRP does not work on Precedent they don't operate on that at all, any notions of Fyfie deciding this are ill informed and wrong.
Fyfies Suspension does not matter!
If the cut was taped after he hit the dirt the first time, he wouldn't have had to leave after the bump.