I've watched it a fair few times since the end of September, the last quarter makes me annoyed every single time.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I lost my shit when that free was paid against Gibson. I still do now.
That umpire needs to be removed from finals, because he doesn't understand football at all.
As much as I think the Monfrees decision was shite, I think a case can be made for the way the umpire called it. If he (the ref) thought that Gibbo shifted his eyes from the ball, then it could be conceived that he was charging into Monfrees. And if you look closely, Gibbo did move his head a little.
From the Hawk pov, he as simply running with the ball trying to intercept. But from the refs pov, ???????
Fair point. My bad. Too much time up here in Shitney.I can't take your point seriously when you call the ump ref.
I wasn't arguing whether it was the right call or not. Simply stating that if the umpire thought that Gibbo was not focussing on the ball, then he could have interpreted it as charging.It was the wrong decision. Mo fries looks at gibbo before the ball arrives and is quite aware of what he was doing. There is nothing in the rules about looking at players etc. gibbo was contesting the ball which is all he was required to do.
it could be argued that monfries was playing for the free and it was well played by him and in hindsight i don't find that unreasonable. in the heat of the battle it was hard to fathom tho. whatever the case i do not like players like monfries who would rather play the umpire/free than the ball.It was the wrong decision. Mo fries looks at gibbo before the ball arrives and is quite aware of what he was doing. There is nothing in the rules about looking at players etc. gibbo was contesting the ball which is all he was required to do.
I do hate that any player running with the flight of the ball has a presumed free kick against them in an aerial marking contest.It was the wrong decision. Mo fries looks at gibbo before the ball arrives and is quite aware of what he was doing. There is nothing in the rules about looking at players etc. gibbo was contesting the ball which is all he was required to do.
I managed to get general admin. Hoping that will be okay if we get there early?Tickets booked. Who else was lucky enough to pick tickets up this morning?
Tickets booked. Who else was lucky enough to pick tickets up this morning?
Got mine confirmed by the club yesterday.Tickets booked. Who else was lucky enough to pick tickets up this morning?
what the F*** has booking tickets got to do with last years PFGot mine confirmed by the club yesterday.
This one is going to be ****ing huge.
Just carrying on the discussion as started by others. It's a bit too early to start the round 4 thread when we haven't even played round 1, isn't it?what the F*** has booking tickets got to do with last years PF
what the F*** has booking tickets got to do with last years PF
Tickets to Etihad @ 2pm today? Where'd ya score them?!Tickets booked. Who else was lucky enough to pick tickets up this morning?
In that Brown v Krummel marking contest, it should have been a free against Brown, if that was the case?I mean "front on contact!"
How is that a rule?
One ball, two guys going for it, should not be a free kick unless you illegally impede someone else or you cop them high.
Why freo p35?
I must admit to being a doubter... just too many holes in the side.