News Hawthorn Racism Scandal

Remove this Banner Ad

Everything points to there being more than a bit of truth in the claims.

Sent from my Nokia 7.2 using Tapatalk
Yeah

Papa g and saltiga want to paint the picture of a man being tried without evidence.

They’re wrong. There is evidence, they are confusing physical evidence, which if they’re expecting in a case like this they’ve setting a bar that doesn’t exist in the real world. People lose their jobs, career related licenses, and have rulings made against them in courts and arbitration all the time without a smoking gun with fingerprints or hidden footage of them red handed.

What’s more believable, multiple people come forward with corroborating stories which are false, they’re just in cahoots to gain something.. hawks commission a report and bury it for no reason, hawks refuse to release Egan from the NDA so he can testify about his findings because his findings … exonerate them?

Or multiple corroborating stories cause there was a pattern of behaviour, Hawks commissioned a report cause it was necessary, and they are hesitant to release Egan from his NDA cause his findings don’t look good for them.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

The fact hawthorn won’t release Egan from a NDA when it’s vitally important to move forward strikes me as an obvious indication that there’s stuff there they desperately do not want to come out.
There's obviously plenty there however it's now set up perfectly for thr AFL to release a bullshit report thst excludes Egan's information and will be able to clear Clarkson.

North fans will rejoice and be up and about and blame Kane Corner for something.

On SM-G781B using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
The Fix is almost in...





the-simpsons-homer-simpson.gif
 
Amusing how the lefties on here don't say a thing about Thomas' behaviour but of course clarkson must be a racist.

Guess there's a group that have to feed the massive chip on their shoulder, which in turn only holds aboriginal people back. Noel Pearson himself said it.
 
Last edited:
Amusing how the lefties on here don't say a thing about Thomas' behaviour but of course clarkson must be a racist.

Guess there's a group that have to feed the massive chip on their shoulder, which in turn only holds aboriginal people back. Noel Pearson himself said it.
Yes nobody on here has said anything about Thomas' behaviour, assuming you've been browsing with your eyes closed and your fingers in your ears.

With every single post you make on this board, you embarrass yourself further.
 
Yes nobody on here has said anything about Thomas' behaviour, assuming you've been browsing with your eyes closed and your fingers in your ears.

With every single post you make on this board, you embarrass yourself further.
Always trying to take comments out of context shulzey to assist your point of view. I never said everyone. Those most desperate and loudest for clarkson to be judged a racist have been quiet on Thomas.

Clowns like you think that reverse racism is the answer to compensate for the historical mistreatment of aboriginal people.



On SM-A736B using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
Always trying to take comments out of context shulzey to assist your point of view. I never said everyone. Those most desperate and loudest for clarkson to be judged a racist have been quiet on Thomas.
Absolutely incorrect like everything else you post.
 
It is a disgrace that Hawthorn are holding Egan to his non disclosure clause. It is a palpable failure to be open and frank with the investigation. It is a disgrace that the AFL won’t indemnify Egan. They either want a full investigation or they don’t.

Having said that, Egan ought to ignore the clause. Hawthorn has already passed the report to the AFL and the investigators. What damages could possibly flow from Egan speaking to the panel that wouldn’t already flow from the panel being given the report?

Without Egan’s evidence, Clarkson and his buddies will not clear their name. A half arsed investigation will mean the stench will follow Clarkson, Hawthorn and the old fart who coaches Brisbane forever.
 
It is a disgrace that Hawthorn are holding Egan to his non disclosure clause. It is a palpable failure to be open and frank with the investigation. It is a disgrace that the AFL won’t indemnify Egan. They either want a full investigation or they don’t.

Having said that, Egan ought to ignore the clause. Hawthorn has already passed the report to the AFL and the investigators. What damages could possibly flow from Egan speaking to the panel that wouldn’t already flow from the panel being given the report?

Without Egan’s evidence, Clarkson and his buddies will not clear their name. A half arsed investigation will mean the stench will follow Clarkson, Hawthorn and the old fart who coaches Brisbane forever.
Those who agreed to participate in the Egan report would've done so in the knowledge there was a non-disclosure clause protecting their identities.

On SM-A736B using BigFooty.com mobile app
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Yeah

Papa g and saltiga want to paint the picture of a man being tried without evidence.

They’re wrong. There is evidence, they are confusing physical evidence, which if they’re expecting in a case like this they’ve setting a bar that doesn’t exist in the real world. People lose their jobs, career related licenses, and have rulings made against them in courts and arbitration all the time without a smoking gun with fingerprints or hidden footage of them red handed.

What’s more believable, multiple people come forward with corroborating stories which are false, they’re just in cahoots to gain something.. hawks commission a report and bury it for no reason, hawks refuse to release Egan from the NDA so he can testify about his findings because his findings … exonerate them?

Or multiple corroborating stories cause there was a pattern of behaviour, Hawks commissioned a report cause it was necessary, and they are hesitant to release Egan from his NDA cause his findings don’t look good for them.
Allegations like these tend to get looked through a lens that suits the bias at the time.

Guarantee that if Clarkson chose to come to Port at the end of 2022 instead of North then even his current most vocal detractors on here would have a completely different view of the allegations. It would be the Port board defending clarkson and the North board attacking him.

JHF is a classic example of this phenomenon. JHF chooses Richmond instead of Port and guarantee we're with the North supporters calling him a campaigner! Football fans are very fickle.

Another guarantee is Shulzey will come out spitting venom from his acid tongue because he can't handle the truth.

On SM-A736B using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
Last edited:
Allegations like these tend to get looked through a lens that suits the bias at the time.

Guarantee that if Clarkson chose to come to Port at the end of 2022 instead of North then even his current most vocal detractors on here would have a completely different view of the allegations. It would be the Port board defending clarkson and the North board attacking him.

JHF is a classic example of this phenomenon. JHF chooses Richmond instead of Port and guarantee we're with the North supporters calling him a campaigner! Football fans are very fickle.

Another guarantee is Shulzey will come out spitting venom from his acid tongue because he can't handle the truth.

On SM-A736B using BigFooty.com mobile app
Not true. I would want Clarkson out.

Similarly, it Boak was racist like Walker, I would want him the **** out of the club as well
 
port fans are pretty well ready to lynch our own when given half a reason, that you somehow think we would all be in a United front defending Clarkson if he was here is laughable.

If Clarkson had signed here, then these allegations came out port fans wouldn’t be denying they happened, they would be saying just our ****ing luck and blasting our footy ops team for not doing their research and blasting them if they didn’t act quickly and decisively enough.


Port fans generally don’t want to sweep and deny, we’re more angry shakes fist types lol.

I think the general idea is that our club is bigger than people, and we’re generally outraged when people don’t live up to the club.

Hell, half this board wanted wines head on a pike for waterskiing.

The idea that we wouldn’t be just as pissed off about Clarkson if he was coach here? Lol. We would be twice as pissed off and twice as vocal about it if he was here.
 
This will maybe end up like the Crows camp scandal. Simmering under the surface (rug) and popping its head up now and then.

That's what I was thinking. In the end it was the absolute worst thing they could have done. By attempting to cover it up everyone assumed that it was worse than it actually was. In the end, nothing really came out that was new that wasn't reported fairly early in the piece. It was really only when Josh Jenkins spoke out that any additional details came out, and whilst the specifics cemented that it was a shitty thing to do, it didn't really add much to what had already been said. If Hawthorn try and obfuscate the process a) I am going to assume they are guilty as sin and b) that there is worse stuff in there.
 
port fans are pretty well ready to lynch our own when given half a reason, that you somehow think we would all be in a United front defending Clarkson if he was here is laughable.

If Clarkson had signed here, then these allegations came out port fans wouldn’t be denying they happened, they would be saying just our ******* luck and blasting our footy ops team for not doing their research and blasting them if they didn’t act quickly and decisively enough.


Port fans generally don’t want to sweep and deny, we’re more angry shakes fist types lol.

I think the general idea is that our club is bigger than people, and we’re generally outraged when people don’t live up to the club.

Hell, half this board wanted wines head on a pike for waterskiing.

The idea that we wouldn’t be just as pissed off about Clarkson if he was coach here? Lol. We would be twice as pissed off and twice as vocal about it if he was here.
Clarkson hasn't been found guilty of anything yet and we'd be lynching him after he replaced Hinkley?

JHF is evidence enough for me as to how the majority would view the Clarkson allegations...... that is innocent until proven guilty. North have been throwing out allegations that JHF did this and did that but he has our unconditional support because he's on our team now.

Crows camp was found to be a massive storm in a tea cup so Eddie could promote his book.

On SM-A736B using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
Clarkson hasn't been found guilty of anything yet and we'd be lynching him after he replaced Hinkley?

JHF is evidence enough for me as to how the majority would view the Clarkson allegations...... that is innocent until proven guilty. North have been throwing out allegations that JHF did this and did that but he has our unconditional support because he's on our team now.

Crows camp was found to be a massive storm in a tea cup so Eddie could promote his book.

On SM-A736B using BigFooty.com mobile app

Yes, I too like to have my employer bring up the deficiencies in my upbringing in front of all my colleagues. Was a really dumb thing to do by MBA having wannabe douchebags. It should have been knocked on the head immediately and been called out as a mistake. Instead, the club sent out senior players to read reprepared lines about how the camp 'helped them as a father and a man', further alienating the players who were badly mistreated on the camp. Additionally, they tried to play it down and conceal what happened. In the end it became a 'crying wolf' scenario where the stuff that was being reported was pretty offensive, but they were playing it down, so there must have been worse stuff that they're hiding, but there wasn't.
 
Clarkson hasn't been found guilty of anything yet and we'd be lynching him after he replaced Hinkley?

JHF is evidence enough for me as to how the majority would view the Clarkson allegations...... that is innocent until proven guilty. North have been throwing out allegations that JHF did this and did that but he has our unconditional support because he's on our team now.

Crows camp was found to be a massive storm in a tea cup so Eddie could promote his book.

On SM-A736B using BigFooty.com mobile app
I don't know if I could be this consistently wrong about everything if I was actively trying to be. Is this performance art?
 
Clarkson hasn't been found guilty of anything yet and we'd be lynching him after he replaced Hinkley?

JHF is evidence enough for me as to how the majority would view the Clarkson allegations...... that is innocent until proven guilty. North have been throwing out allegations that JHF did this and did that but he has our unconditional support because he's on our team now.

Crows camp was found to be a massive storm in a tea cup so Eddie could promote his book.

On SM-A736B using BigFooty.com mobile app

What a dumb comparison.

What has north accused jhf of? Not having an ice bath when it turned out they were mismanaging his injury?

What on earth do you think port fans would have any kind of beef with jhf for?

Also, in what way was the camp a storm in a tea cup? Gee you’re coming across as 1 step away from holocaust denial.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

News Hawthorn Racism Scandal

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top