I have read/heard on radio over past few days that both Dogs and Geelong have undertaken heavy training loads as a lead up to the finals.
The thinking, as i understand it, is that by increasing the training load at this time, a team then benefits from tapering - reducing the load - and is at optimal peak performance at a later time (ie September).
Both teams looked very flat and tired in their games.
With Dogs precariously placed in the top 4 and needing to win games to ensure a double chance and with Geelong having its preparation interrupted with injuries, unsure if undertaking a heavy training programme at this point in time is wise.
I remember talk of Neil Craig employing this approach in 2006 when Crows were flying and good things to win the flag. They fell apart in the last part of the season.
Seems to me its all well and good when preparing athletes for one event (eg a marathon) when nothing else really matters in the build up, but in footy, when you have to win games in that heavy workload period, question whether the perceived results outweigh the negatives.
The thinking, as i understand it, is that by increasing the training load at this time, a team then benefits from tapering - reducing the load - and is at optimal peak performance at a later time (ie September).
Both teams looked very flat and tired in their games.
With Dogs precariously placed in the top 4 and needing to win games to ensure a double chance and with Geelong having its preparation interrupted with injuries, unsure if undertaking a heavy training programme at this point in time is wise.
I remember talk of Neil Craig employing this approach in 2006 when Crows were flying and good things to win the flag. They fell apart in the last part of the season.
Seems to me its all well and good when preparing athletes for one event (eg a marathon) when nothing else really matters in the build up, but in footy, when you have to win games in that heavy workload period, question whether the perceived results outweigh the negatives.