Toast How can this Melbourne side be stopped?

Remove this Banner Ad

It's almost like Tomlinson isn't injured, our KPF's weren't missing for the first month. Hibberd didn't miss the first month, Melksham didn't miss the start of the season, Harmes wasn't out for a month, May didn't fracture his eye socket early v Geelong and miss the next week. Viney hasn't been out for a few weeks, Luke Jackson didn't miss injured and Salem didn't play v Adelaide.



Sent from my SM-G981B using Tapatalk
Lol is that it? We've had up to 8 of our best 22 out at once and it's been like that for weeks
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Do you want an award for the world's biggest sook?
Who gives a sh*t. If you want sympathy it's between sh*t and syphilis in the dictionary
I'd say the post I quoted was a fairly large sook. Maybe rivalling all those sooks after losing to Adelaide

Also, try coming up with something yourself instead of stealing lines
 
They're not as good as their form suggests. Extremely weak in defence when the ball hits the ground and their midfield is still pretty one-note, even if some players have improved.

I would be extremely disappointed if we lost on Friday, even without Dunkley and Treloar. I don't expect us to lose any remaining games at Marvel while we're playing this way.
 
It's almost like Tomlinson isn't injured, our KPF's weren't missing for the first month. Hibberd didn't miss the first month, Melksham didn't miss the start of the season, Harmes wasn't out for a month, May didn't fracture his eye socket early v Geelong and miss the next week. Viney hasn't been out for a few weeks, Luke Jackson didn't miss injured and Salem didn't play v Adelaide.



Sent from my SM-G981B using Tapatalk

Lol you're better off without Brown and Weideman, particularly Weid. He's woeful.
 
Why don't you come up with more injuries to whine about knackers

Here's one:

00Stinger said:
It's almost like Tomlinson isn't injured, our KPF's weren't missing for the first month. Hibberd didn't miss the first month, Melksham didn't miss the start of the season, Harmes wasn't out for a month, May didn't fracture his eye socket early v Geelong and miss the next week. Viney hasn't been out for a few weeks, Luke Jackson didn't miss injured and Salem didn't play v Adelaide.
 
I don't need to. Doesn't seem to be stopping the results.

Wonder what your excuse will be if melbourne lose this week

Maybe it'll be the umpires again
Find a single Qoute ever where I blamed the umpires. I dare you.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Lol is that it? We've had up to 8 of our best 22 out at once and it's been like that for weeks

Bulldogs supporters keep claiming they have a third of their team out injured yet can't state who those injured players would replace in their current side. I don't think they understand the concept of "best 22".
 
I don't need to. Doesn't seem to be stopping the results.

Wonder what your excuse will be if melbourne lose this week

Maybe it'll be the umpires again

What was your excuse when the Dogs lost to Richmond minus Dusty, Prestia, Lambert etc
 
Bulldogs supporters keep claiming they have a third of their team out injured yet can't state who those injured players would replace in their current side. I don't think they understand the concept of "best 22".

I've seen a Bulldogs supporter post this elsewhere:

Gardner - Cordy
English - Hannan
Martin - Sweet
Vandermeer - McNeil
Dunkley - Roarke Smith
McLean - Weightman
Wood - Crozier
Richards - Scott
 
I'd say the post I quoted was a fairly large sook. Maybe rivalling all those sooks after losing to Adelaide

Also, try coming up with something yourself instead of stealing lines
How am I sooking by just correcting your bullshit post?




Sent from my SM-G981B using Tapatalk
 
Lol you're better off without Brown and Weideman, particularly Weid. He's woeful.
Retrospectively you are probably right. But we wouldn't know that if he hadn't of had injuries

Which is surprising considering apparently we haven had any injuries

Sent from my SM-G981B using Tapatalk
 
Retrospectively you are probably right. But we wouldn't know that if he hadn't of had injuries

Which is surprising considering apparently we haven had any injuries

Sent from my SM-G981B using Tapatalk

You've definitely had injuries - every side has, they just haven't been of any real significance or extended duration aside from Viney for 3 weeks.

Tomlinson is probably the other one, he's a good player but should definitely be coverable.

The whole 'but but but we've had injuries toooooooo' narrative coming from some Demons fans is laughable. Just embrace the fact your best 22-25 is rock solid and your conditioning guys have them humming. No shame in it.
 
Got to love a bunch of supporters trying to take the underdog status before the game
Who’s trying to take underdog status? (Even through the betting markets suggest they are)

This thread by a Dogs supporter is suggesting Melbourne are unstoppable but the were just stopped by Adelaide. They will try to claim if they win this week they just worked out how to beat the unstoppable team. Problem is it’s already been done, credit to Adelaide.

Then on the other hand you have Dogs supporters talking about injuries and this was going on last week as well in threads about Melbourne. Already preempting the injury excuse. You’ll hear about it next week I guarantee it if the Dogs lose injuries injuries injuries.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Toast How can this Melbourne side be stopped?

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top