If Patrick Dangerfield Comes Within 3 Votes of a Brownlow...

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Dusty was fined twice for nothing! That was shocking. Yes Trent Cotchin was more than lucky 3 times but at the end of the day Dusty never sooked or carried on and didn't do anything undisciplined.

He played effing outstanding footy! lets just leave it at that. All the other shit can be filled under the other players threads.

Didn't do anything undisciplined? He punched someone full on in the head and was reported twice in one game. Hawkins was suspended for one week then two for "jumper punches" with less force than Martin.
 
Geelong salt is the best salt.

latest
Huh? No one from Geelong is salty that Dusty won. I'm glad he won, he's great. Richmond has done nothing for 35 years so I'm actually happy they're in the big dance and hoping they win.

What is with this grand conspiracy that Geelong fans are salty about this? The only club that could make us salty is our rival, Hawthorn.
 
Coaches votes round 22
10 Dangerfield
8 Menegola
4 Hoskin-Elliot
3 Adams
2 Cox
2 Stewart
1 Murdoch

Brownlow votes
3 Duncan
2 Menegola
1 Adams

Piss off AFL. Don’t piss in my pocket and tell me it’s raining.

Coaches votes round 14:

10 Dustin Martin
5 Matthew Kreuzer
5 Kane Lambert
4 Alex Rance
3 Patrick Cripps
3 Shaun Grigg

Brownlow Votes:

3 Patrick Cripps
2 Alex Rance
1 Dustin Martin

Both coaches had Dusty BOG, one coach didn't even have Cripps in his top 5, yet he polls 3 in a loss.

You can cry all you want about Danger not polling in one game, Dusty has similar examples of being robbed.

To win the Brownlow you need to poll the most and not get suspended. Danger failed on both counts.

Danger didn't miss out because of some AFL conspiracy, he missed out because Martin had a superior season, which was highlighted by his BOG against the Cats in the QF while Danger put in a shocker.

Cry some more
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Huh? No one from Geelong is salty that Dusty won. I'm glad he won, he's great. Richmond has done nothing for 35 years so I'm actually happy they're in the big dance and hoping they win.

What is with this grand conspiracy that Geelong fans are salty about this? The only club that could make us salty is our rival, Hawthorn.

are you their finals bunny too?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Dusty will poll 40 votes and assert himself as the GOAT
record breaking year but all this count did was confirm the greatenss of dangerfield. Spent the third of the season playing lame with first broken ribs and then afoot injury and then missed a game for a dodgy suspension and then got robbed of votes in the last round and still picked up 33 votes. greatest individual 2 years from a player ever.
 
Dangerfield the sort of bloke to smack his own ass during sex.

Something about the way he conducts himself is just off.

Still give him the nudge over Martin because he's just a tractor, but Martin the better team player and smarter footballer.
 
has anyone ever put in a better 2 year performance at the brownlow then danger? 68 votes.

His 33 votes would win in almost every season. is basically now a two times brownlow winner.
has he got two medals? that's like saying jab Watson has a medal too
 
record breaking year but all this count did was confirm the greatenss of dangerfield. Spent the third of the season playing lame with first broken ribs and then afoot injury and then missed a game for a dodgy suspension and then got robbed of votes in the last round and still picked up 33 votes. greatest individual 2 years from a player ever.

Dont worry about the Brownlow mate, the Prime Minister will set things right on Australia Day and award him an AO for being such a sick campaigner :thumbsu:
 
Not sure if the AFL had to intervene and Martin is a deserving winner but history says the AFL state manage everything.

No way Dangerfield was ever going to be leading the votes at the end of the count.
 
has he got two medals? that's like saying jab Watson has a medal too
there are brownlow winners with less then 20 votes and non brownlow winners with 30. brownlow rules should be changed. every player who gets atleast 27 votes in a season should get a brownlow. if there are seasons where no one gets 27 then the brownlow should not be awarded. That is a much more just approach to the award.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top