Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not sure where to put this so I started a new thread - this is grim
Too focused on campaigning for a voice that achieves nothing than actual tangible metrics like this one. Identity politics > real politics...What are you going to do about it, besides whinging on a footy forum?
Aussies are piss weak.
Dutton is doing all the campaigning for a yes vote at the moment - all the decent people are just standing back laughing at him.Too focused on campaigning for a voice that achieves nothing than actual tangible metrics like this one. Identity politics > real politics...
What are you going to do about it, besides whinging on a footy forum?
Too focused on campaigning for a voice that achieves nothing than actual tangible metrics like this one. Identity politics > real politics...
Can't wait for the stage 3 tax cuts so the well-off can have even more money!
Or we could just tax people and business properly and pay people properly.if we want equality
1) introduce a proper property tax
2) increase social housing with a rent to buy/ islamic banking model
3) increase GST
Or we could just tax people and business properly and pay people properly.
Less of Australia's national income is going to workers than ever before
The latest GDP figures show more than ever before workers are getting less than their fair shareaustraliainstitute.org.au
View attachment 1657503
There has not been a significant rise in real wages for decades.You mean appropriately.
I can't for the life of me understand why the top tax rate has to cut in at only $180,000. Surely there could be another tax bracket that kicks in at, say $300,000 with a higher rate.
Also, we'd get a lot further with tax simplification than increasing taxes. Every deduction is attached to a behaviour that at one stage a government thought was something they would like to encourage. All those have to be looked at to ensure effectiveness. Simplifying the tax laws would enable much more revenue to be raised without increasing any rate of tax.
Final tip: don't confuse revenue with profits - a common tool of those trying to make the "they don't pay enough tax" point.
Concerning trend there.Or we could just tax people and business properly and pay people properly.
Less of Australia's national income is going to workers than ever before
The latest GDP figures show more than ever before workers are getting less than their fair shareaustraliainstitute.org.au
View attachment 1657503
Or we could just tax people and business properly and pay people properly.
Less of Australia's national income is going to workers than ever before
The latest GDP figures show more than ever before workers are getting less than their fair shareaustraliainstitute.org.au
View attachment 1657503
What do you think of removing negative gearing as it currently stands and offering tax benefits only to those who invest in social housing? Either a company that builds/develops social housing through a tender process or individuals/companies investing for the future? I'm not sure how social housing currently operates, but the public/private partnership with safeguards put in place for those accessing housing and income guarantees for individuals investing in this form of housing, would surely be a better option than the current model.if we want equality
1) introduce a proper property tax
2) increase social housing with a rent to buy/ islamic banking model
3) increase GST
Well we voted the Liberals/Nationals out of office on mainland Australia.What do you suggest he do?
What do you think of removing negative gearing as it currently stands and offering tax benefits only to those who invest in social housing? Either a company that builds/develops social housing through a tender process or individuals/companies investing for the future? I'm not sure how social housing currently operates, but the public/private partnership with safeguards put in place for those accessing housing and income guarantees for individuals investing in this form of housing, would surely be a better option than the current model.
That way we still allow people to invest in real estate but it is done in a more socially conscious manner.
What do you think of removing negative gearing as it currently stands and offering tax benefits only to those who invest in social housing? Either a company that builds/develops social housing through a tender process or individuals/companies investing for the future? I'm not sure how social housing currently operates, but the public/private partnership with safeguards put in place for those accessing housing and income guarantees for individuals investing in this form of housing, would surely be a better option than the current model.
That way we still allow people to invest in real estate but it is done in a more socially conscious manner.