Opinion INTERNATIONAL Politics: Adelaide Board Discussion Part 5

Remove this Banner Ad

Nobody is disputing they will have to prove it. He's going to have a hard time proving it wasn't wilful though. Read the indictment. It includes a mile long list of advisors who told Trump he lost the election. They have him privately acknowledging he lost the election. They have him saying that Sidney Powell (Kraken lady) was a crackpot. They also have testimony from the Vice President saying that when he told him there was no grounds to overturn he election, Trump told Pence "you're too honest".

Let's be honest though Pete, he could be found guilty in court and you guys will immediately pivot to the arguing the court itself is corrupt. Right wing media are already telegraphing this.
Is the whole trial kind of the point of people trying to prove things ?

But agree on the last paragraph, it's already whats happened with election, voting laws, DOJ, FBI and anyone else who doesn't believe they won the 2020 election.

They still love Russia though, which is weird.
 
Is the whole trial kind of the point of people trying to prove things ?
When they start a criminal investigation, the DA presents it's evidence to a grand jury and they vote on whether or not to indict. The indictment itself is not evidence. It's merely a formal accusation (charges). Then there is an arraignment where the charges are explained to the defendant, and they will either plead guilty or not guilty. If they plead not guilty, it will go to trial and prosecutors will have to present their evidence in court.

The part of this I always found confusing was the difference between a grand jury and a trial jury. A grand jury only hears one side of the argument (the governments side) and they only vote on whether to bring charges. A trial jury will hear both sides of the argument, and ultimately decide on whether to convict the defendant.
 
Last edited:
Again, you are making big statements with nothing to back it up.

Your whole position related to hearsay, whilst your MAGA brethren continue to be the ones being shown to be suppressing voters, committing election fraud and trying to complete a coup.

As Trump is finding out, saying an election is stolen is fine in the US. But he went further and that's why he is in trouble.
Lol. The old saying if you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear so why the prevention of any oversight to the point they are trying at federal and state level to jail people that are trying to conduct oversight.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Lol. The old saying if you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear so why the prevention of any oversight to the point they are trying at federal and state level to jail people that are trying to conduct oversight.
The only people seemingly being jailed is MAGA supporters breaking election laws.

You never know at the end of the day Trump might be cleared in court.
 
The only people seemingly being jailed is MAGA supporters breaking election laws.

You never know at the end of the day Trump might be cleared in court.
Who broke election laws apart from democrats and again, if you have nothing to hide, then why do everything possible to prevent transparency and accountability

Its the people trying to hide things that are the ones breaking laws usually
 
Last edited:
Who broke election laws apart from democrats and again, if you have nothing to hide, then why do everything possible to prevent transparency and accountability

Its the people trying to hide things that are the ones breaking laws usually
Again, big statements no proof.

You are pretty much saying that MAGA is so incompetent it can't find any evidence of election fraud by democrats despite it being so obvious to everyone else.

Or it's not happening, which whilst MAGA are incompetent, is probably more likely the case.
 
I mean, you have to be pretty cooked to suggest CNN is a conspiracy theory network, but okay

Here it is from another source


See it is true 🙄
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Do they realize how much more difficult they’d be to argue against if they didn’t always have this weird compulsion to occupy a totally imaginary moral high ground?

They just can’t admit they hate the Orange Man so much that they want to see him locked up no matter what it takes.

It’s the same way they couldn’t admit that the reason they supported vaccine mandates was because they enjoyed watching unvaxxed people suffer. They had to pretend that the unvaxxed were a direct risk to their safety — an obviously laughable premise and one which none of them actually ever believed.

The psychology of it is so intriguing, how they can just lie to themselves so freely.
Look in the mirror matey if you want to see someone lying to themself
 
Again, big statements no proof.

You are pretty much saying that MAGA is so incompetent it can't find any evidence of election fraud by democrats despite it being so obvious to everyone else.

Or it's not happening, which whilst MAGA are incompetent, is probably more likely the case.
Its simple stuff..no proof or no wanting the other side to be able to cross check what the democrats may have done. Nothing to hide then no reason to do everything possible from letting the other side have transparency.

You can't be incompetent if when you try and get accountability the other side try and litigate you to jail

I would have thought that by trying to jail the person questioning the election is a bad way of trying to say that the elections were in fact fair and transparent..think on that
 
Its simple stuff..no proof or no wanting the other side to be able to cross check what the democrats may have done. Nothing to hide then no reason to do everything possible from letting the other side have transparency.
It's so simple MAGA can't prove it, we've established that.

But what does that say about MAGA
You can't be incompetent if when you try and get accountability the other side try and litigate you to jail
You can be if you despite all the claims get absolutely nothing except potentially the dodgy kid of the President on gun and tax crimes.
I would have thought that by trying to jail the person questioning the election is a bad way of trying to say that the elections were in fact fair and transparent..think on that
As has been explained to you, he won't be jailed for saying it, they've made that very clear. It's acting on it.
 
You're half-right.
No I'm completely right.

I personally don't watch CNN nor have an opinion on them one way or another, but I can't deny they are a well established news outlet with global reach.

I mean, let's face it, you don't post here because your views are accepted by the broader community, you post here because you found a safe space for posters who share your over the top distust of main stream media. That should be enough to tell you how wrong you are.
 
It's so simple MAGA can't prove it, we've established that.

But what does that say about MAGA

You can be if you despite all the claims get absolutely nothing except potentially the dodgy kid of the President on gun and tax crimes.

As has been explained to you, he won't be jailed for saying it, they've made that very clear. It's acting on it.
I will give you the benefit of the doubt..you din't actually either read my post or didn't understand it.

I will say again...if you have nothing to hide you don't prevent accountability by trying to silence and jail those who question the election. You also be objective when evidence is presented and investigate it...not try and sue and criminally litigate those who bring forward evidence.

Simple question, unlike 2020 do you believe elections going forward should be completely fair and transparent and that only legal voters should be permitted to partake in them?
 
No I'm completely right.

I personally don't watch CNN nor have an opinion on them one way or another, but I can't deny they are a well established news outlet with global reach.

I mean, let's face it, you don't post here because your views are accepted by the broader community, you post here because you found a safe space for posters who share your over the top distust of main stream media. That should be enough to tell you how wrong you are.
He meant the half right bit was the global reach part. The rest was wrong..they are purveyors of fake news and peddle conspiracy theories
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Opinion INTERNATIONAL Politics: Adelaide Board Discussion Part 5

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top