Opinion INTERNATIONAL Politics: Adelaide Board Discussion Part 6

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

Who would have seen that coming. Funny coming from CNN. It probably reflects their own ratings. ;)




with policies like this haave have they gone wrong.



1742168155297.png
 
Mutineer said:
LOL

yeah you Laborites love them handouts, why should taxpayers that get nought from the Government pay your HECS debt that you acrued for your personal benefit. Pay your way like the rest of us have to. It's not the Government Labor, Liberal or any other Political Party that's paying for it it's us mug taxpayers that worked for everything we've got with no handouts.
Click to expand...

From what you are saying I presume you are not in the top tax brackets which would mean you would also benefit from the tax breaks they provided. All the while they have simultaneously managed to reduce the deficit.

So when you say “the taxpayer pays for it” I’m not sure who exactly you’re referring to.

It’s almost like Labor tends to have a holistic approach to policy where the priority is helping working and middle class people. Also, the recipients of HECS support are very often people like teachers, nurses, vets etc. professions that greatly benefit the community but, while are well paid, don’t have ridiculous high earning potential. The government should absolutely be incentivising people to go in to those industries for the benefit of the overall community.
 
Soggy2112 said:
From what you are saying I presume you are not in the top tax brackets which would mean you would also benefit from the tax breaks they provided. All the while they have simultaneously managed to reduce the deficit.

So when you say “the taxpayer pays for it” I’m not sure who exactly you’re referring to.

It’s almost like Labor tends to have a holistic approach to policy where the priority is helping working and middle class people. Also, the recipients of HECS support are very often people like teachers, nurses, vets etc. professions that greatly benefit the community but, while are well paid, don’t have ridiculous high earning potential. The government should absolutely be incentivising people to go in to those industries for the benefit of the overall community.
Click to expand...
Why don't you post on the Australian politics thread. :think:
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Soggy2112 said:
From what you are saying I presume you are not in the top tax brackets which would mean you would also benefit from the tax breaks they provided. All the while they have simultaneously managed to reduce the deficit.

So when you say “the taxpayer pays for it” I’m not sure who exactly you’re referring to.

It’s almost like Labor tends to have a holistic approach to policy where the priority is helping working and middle class people. Also, the recipients of HECS support are very often people like teachers, nurses, vets etc. professions that greatly benefit the community but, while are well paid, don’t have ridiculous high earning potential. The government should absolutely be incentivising people to go in to those industries for the benefit of the overall community.
Click to expand...
Maga seem to want it both ways, no immigrants doing these jobs but also not supporting Aussies to train for these jobs. It’s almost as if they don’t have a working brain.
 
News Corp Australia further moving against Trump with headline now calling his excuse “absurd”.

Like seriously what sort of ****** up person jokes around or makes up shit with this. He is total scum. Both major promises - getting inflation down (now proven to be a lie as was just an “politically expedient” statement as per Pete for the masses of stupid people) AND stopping the war on day one. What’s actually true?

Not sure if any MAGA fans had any thoughts on this clear change? And this is before Rupert drops off


US politics live: Donald Trump offers absurd excuse for failure to deliver on Ukraine war promise​

Donald Trump has offered a dubious excuse for his failure to deliver on an explicit promise, made repeatedly before last year’s election.

'I was being sarcastic': Trump's laughable excuse

Donald Trump has insisted he was being “sarcastic” when he repeatedly promised American voters, during last year’s election campaign, that he would end the war between Ukraine and Russia within 24 hours of taking office, if not before then.
“I’m not understating the complexity of all this, but as a candidate, you said you would have this war settled in 24 hours,” journalist Sharyl Attkisson, hardly an unfriendly voice, put to Mr Trump during an interview with him on her platform Full Measure.

“Well, I was being a little bit sarcastic when I said that. What I really mean is I’d like to get it settled, and I think I’ll be successful,” Mr Trump responded.
Hmm. Yes. Well. The thing is, the President’s remarks are on tape. We can watch them back. And don’t you know, there’s nary a hint of sarcasm in them.
 
Last edited:
119others said:
News Corp Australia further moving against Trump with headline now calling his excuse “absurd”.

Like seriously what sort of ****** up person jokes around or makes up shit with this. He is total scum. Both major promises - getting inflation down (now proven to be a lie as was just an “politically expedient” statement as per Pete for the masses of stupid people) AND stopping the war on day one. What’s actually true?

Not sure if any MAGA fans had any thoughts on this clear change? And this is before Rupert drops off


US politics live: Donald Trump offers absurd excuse for failure to deliver on Ukraine war promise​

Donald Trump has offered a dubious excuse for his failure to deliver on an explicit promise, made repeatedly before last year’s election.

'I was being sarcastic': Trump's laughable excuse

Donald Trump has insisted he was being “sarcastic” when he repeatedly promised American voters, during last year’s election campaign, that he would end the war between Ukraine and Russia within 24 hours of taking office, if not before then.
“I’m not understating the complexity of all this, but as a candidate, you said you would have this war settled in 24 hours,” journalist Sharyl Attkisson, hardly an unfriendly voice, put to Mr Trump during an interview with him on her platform Full Measure.

“Well, I was being a little bit sarcastic when I said that. What I really mean is I’d like to get it settled, and I think I’ll be successful,” Mr Trump responded.
Hmm. Yes. Well. The thing is, the President’s remarks are on tape. We can watch them back. And don’t you know, there’s nary a hint of sarcasm in them.
Click to expand...

Yeah I saw this. Then I saw others defend him by saying 'When Trump said that he will solve the war in 24 hours, he didnt mean on his first day, he never specified which 24 hours'

Yes you read that right that is 100% a quote from someone defending Trump.

There is no doubt in anyones mind that Trump was aiming for peace for the wrong reasons...such as the idiotic rhetoric from a few governers positioning him for a Nobel Peace prize. Which in my view was to con the world into the cult.

The reason that this was the obvious game plan is because everything Trump did in the efforts to kill this war went against everything the USA ever stands for and went so far as to alienate long term allies. It was an absurd strategy from the get go and one that was obvious. Yes lets blame the victim for the aggressor invading them. Anyone who refused to see that as idiotic deserves to be called a ****ing idiot. Then to slam people as war mongers and wanting a forever war for standing up for Ukraines sovereignty, sorry that smacks an imbicile label on your ****ing head as well. And its proven to be ****ing idiotic stand point and will not go down in history at all well.

Putin is interested in a ceasefire but based on his interviews it looks every bit of a strategy so his soldiers can regroup and refresh the equipment. But basically he wants Ukraine as an annexed state of Russia and Trumps ploy to gift wrap Ukraine and hand it over was entirely obvious. He is a sad dumb pathetic individual.
 
OneGreatClub said:
Why would Trump kill the anti money laundering law?
Click to expand...

Hmm well lets think about it.

On one hand all the media are being asked to focus on Greenland, Canada, Ukraine, tariffs meanwhile a career criminal and a billionaire with vested interested are ruthlessly gutting every government oversight department and trying to bring all USA international agencies to their bare bones. Its almost as if they dont want you to see something. There is no doubt the media have been ****ing disgraceful in their coverage of Trump. The minute they started shutting down departments, he should have been publicly ripped to shreds, including an absolute demolition job on the fox media puppets. for their outright lying to the public.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Opinion INTERNATIONAL Politics: Adelaide Board Discussion Part 6


Write your reply...

Similar threads

Chief
  • Locked
  • Poll
Opinion INTERNATIONAL Politics: Adelaide Board Discussion Part 5
547 548 549 550 551
Replies
14K
Views
317K
119others
119others
Scorpus
Opinion AUSTRALIAN Politics: Adelaide Board Discussion Part 6
22 23 24 25 26
Replies
641
Views
16K
n4sir
n4sir
Scorpus
  • Locked
Opinion AUSTRALIAN Politics: Adelaide Board Discussion Part 5
397 398 399 400 401
Replies
10K
Views
272K
ADL9798
ADL9798
1970crow
Non-Politics - Pure future power generation and the challenges facing society
Replies
1
Views
155
FR0GGY
FR0GGY
Anzacpaul
2024 Grand Final Day events - Adelaide
Replies
0
Views
396
Anzacpaul
Anzacpaul
Punchy Bassett
Holiday spot discussions.
Replies
10
Views
1K
Crow54
Crow54

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top