blackshadow
Hall of Famer
They seem pretty similar, organise doping, evidence is found then deny, bully, deny, deny and then deny some more.
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Investigation into Essendon Fitness Program
- Thread starter pantskyle
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
Thanks...Wonder if that opinion still holds now.
It's not enough to blame Dank, they also need someone to blame for allowing Dank to act. Looks like Weap's it.
jmac70
On the porch
Judging from the 100 or so text messages between Dank and Hird it is difficult to imagine how the Weapon had any input at all. He appears hardly done by.
LanceRomance
Brownlow Medallist
Have they released more texts?
evo
Let's hit the f*ken road!
yeah, Weap might end up turning out to be one of the few honest ones.
jmac70
On the porch
According to the 7:30 report they are in possesion of them.
''Before I've done anything in any forum, we have always had conversations with WADA [the World Anti-Doping Agency] or ASADA - or in some cases both,'' Dank told Fairfax Media.
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/...onsent-dank-20130408-2hhgk.html#ixzz2S8jgxP6B
Dank asked wada and was directed to ASADA.
Read the first paragraph.
Sports scientist Stephen Dank says he never administered a single product or substance to any athlete without the prior consent of ASADA or WADA.
Neither WADA or ASADA give consent on any product yet he says he has never administered a single product without their consent.
Hollow Knight
Imperfect vessel
- May 3, 2005
- 97,084
- 108,795
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
- Other Teams
- Scuderia Ferrari, Dallas Cowboys
Dank showing Essendon the email.
But seriously... surely he didn't just wave it in their face casually and then run away. This is another part of the story yet to unravel I suspect.
But seriously... surely he didn't just wave it in their face casually and then run away. This is another part of the story yet to unravel I suspect.
- Banned
- #6,586
scapegoat central, although Robinson was stood down only recently despite having the full support from David Evans in August of last year http://www.heraldsun.com.au/afl/don...rman-david-evans/story-e6frf9io-1226456149474
chelseagle
Team Captain
- Mar 18, 2013
- 410
- 316
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Are you one of those naive old timers that believes there's no juicing at the top level of the AFL?Scotch is always a good idea no matter who suggests it.
Call me a mug though because I'm still firmly of the opinion the entire saga, performance enhancing drug wise, is contained within the imaginations of the ACC, a very confined space from the looks of it.
''Never once was anything indicated to me that we would have issues in terms of anything we used.''
Those emails from WADA disclosed tonight suggests differently...
You miss my point, the way the article reads its as if Dank get approval from WADA and ASADA on a regular basis. Not just talking about the EFC or AOD here............but everything he has ever given a player. Sounds very suss to me.
As far as I saw WADA said "refer to asada as the substance may have different regulatory approval in Australia"
It says wada OR asada
IRENE MAZZONI (female voiceover): "Please be aware that there is a section in the prohibited list, S.0, that deals with non-approved substances. Therefore, even if the substance or similar substances do not appear listed, it does not automatically mean the substance is permitted."
IRENE MAZZONI (female voiceover): "I could not find that it had been approved by any government regulatory health authority. That's why I say to contact ASADA to check its status in Australia."
Kind of waves a red flag, WADA rep after her own search could not see that substance in question had not been approved for use by ANY government regulatory health authority.
One would suggest that WADA will go over ASADA if things don't go the way they want IMO
But neither give approval............That's my point, yet he claims its a regular occurrence.
PieBeast
Brownlow Medallist
I've just seen a screen shot on Bomberblitsz of another email from Dank to WADA, some words are blurred out and its hard to tell what it says but my interpretation of it is
Dank says he got a confirmation about AOD not being on the prohibited list and himself came to the conclusion it does not fall under S0, despite being told otherwise by WADA.
Here it is http://www.flickr.com/photos/85225270@N02/8701729170/in/photostream/lightbox/
Dank says he got a confirmation about AOD not being on the prohibited list and himself came to the conclusion it does not fall under S0, despite being told otherwise by WADA.
Here it is http://www.flickr.com/photos/85225270@N02/8701729170/in/photostream/lightbox/
He knows, he just chooses to ignore it because it doesn't suit his argument.
*Dank* is stating because 'The peptide is available within the something something marketed and thus S0 does not apply.'
Thats not WADA saying it's legal. Thats Dank trying to do WADA's job for them.
Thats mxett-level self-delusion.
PieBeast
Brownlow Medallist
Yes, that was precisely my point.
Very easy to confuse being available somewhere with having an approval for therapeutic use, for someone like me.
But not for a Sports Scientist pushing his own agenda
I'd love to see the full emails........Could make for interesting reading. Not sure if 7:30 will make them available to other Media or BF.
- Status
