InVisyble Judd *MB Thread*

[The Human Keg]

Re: InVisyble Judd

And he did not want to go to Collingwood
diddums

He probably thought he was too good to hang around with blue collar criminals, so he hung around with white collar ones instead.

 

[libsug]

Re: InVisyble Judd

And he did not want to go to Collingwood
diddums

He probably thought he was too good to hang around with blue collar criminals, so he hung around with white collar ones instead.

Or (alleged) drug addicts....

 

[Monkey King]

Re: InVisyble Judd

Visy pays Judd. Visy was owned by Dick Pratt who was your president.

Ohhh... look at you. You've put two and two together and come up with **** all.

The issue as deduced from this thread, has nothing to do with:

- how legitimate the deal is
- how much Judd works for it
- his suitablility for the role
- how much he is paid for it
- how much benefit Visy derive
- how it compares to other such like deals
- Visy also being a club sponsor

... it is simply about Pratt - who I'm not too sure was actually president when the deal was done btw.

What I haven't been able to figure out though is how this constitutes cheating

 

[Hodgepodge]

Re: InVisyble Judd

So quite simply you don't like it because it involves Visy.

No, I don't like it because of VISY's relationship with Carlton.

In other words, I don't like that the appointment of Judd to Environmental Ambassador of VISY cannot be seen as a commercial decision, but a Carlton decision. Nice way to get around the cap. Pratt was always good at exploiting loopholes.

 

[blue gunslinger]

Re: InVisyble Judd

He probably thought he was too good to hang around with blue collar criminals, so he hung around with white collar ones instead.

Wise man I would think.

 

[mess]

Re: InVisyble Judd

So his image isn't being rented because you don't see it. That you probably don't suit the demographic Visy are targeting would have more to do with that I'd say. Not everything is mass marketing to the general public. Let me ask... how often did you see Visy images circulated through the public sphere prior to Judd's role?

That's exactly the point. VISY have no reason to advertise to the public, and Judd's image has absolutely no effect on how the corporate sector make business decisions.

Hahaha... now you're pretending to know the workings of a Carlton sponsorship deal. It should be pointed out to you here that such unqualified use of a players image is not a given in club sponsorship deals.

I'd have thought that the right to use the images of players would be a fairly standard clause in most major sponsorship deals...

Performed an audit did you? How did it compare to NAB's verifiable returns or V-Line's? Narative not required, just the figures will do thanks

Yes I did. An audit of common sense. A lack of usefulness + a lack of being in use = pretty effing useless, all in all.

Yes, there really really are; although I respect your choice to ignore them.

That's great. You forgot to answer any of my questions or to supply a realistic scenario that would be more suss than this one though. It's alright, we all make little mistakes. On your own time mate...

 

[mess]

Re: InVisyble Judd

The issue as deduced from this thread, has nothing to do with:

- how legitimate the deal is
- how much Judd works for it
- his suitablility for the role
- how much he is paid for it
- how much benefit Visy derive
- how it compares to other such like deals
- Visy also being a club sponsor

... it is simply about Pratt - who I'm not too sure was actually president when the deal was done btw.

All of those things have everything to do with Pratt, who has everything to do with this deal. And yes, he was president when the deal was made. Had been all season, and was chomping at the wallet to turn them around in hurry.

As deduced by your responses to this thread you're a complete dill who doesn't think we can tell when you know you're talking rubbish.