Certainly shades of “Starship Troopers”I'm not supporting the guy who died. I just find it hypocritical that the US consider him a terrorist for supporting insurgents who attack US interests, while constantly supporting other insurgents who attack those they have a problem with.
US soldiers are targets in Iraq, Afghanistan and Syria. What's the common theme there? Why are they there controlling the oil, controlling factions, installing people favourable to them?
Can Iran bomb US Generals in who plot against their interests, and do so on US soil?
Fact is anybody who kills a US citizen in the middle east is a terrorist to the US. They just put them on a list and that is their justification.
This wasn't a terrorist leader that the world was against. He was a General of a sovereign nation who the US were not at war with. If he was to be assassinated for any actions that have killed Americans in the middle East, then American officials who do the same are surely fair game.
I used to see the US as wearing white hats and killing evil black hat wearers who I couldn't relate to. Now, I'm seeing a lot of grey hats and am cynical about the US as self appointed world police.
Iraq didn't invite them in to their capital to kill this guy. They just do as they want as though they own the whole planet.
They didn't run it by congress as required. That's why they spoke of an imminent threat and planning of attacks against the US. It's the only way they can bypass congress. Any plans they reveal now are going to smack of their WMD narrative for going into Iraq.
Trump broke the nuclear treaty with Iran for no reason, then sanctioned them and threatened to sanction other countries who did business with them. Why wouldn't Iran want them out of the Middle East?
All good though, the media love a war and the stocks of weapons manufacturers are surging suddenly.