- Jan 3, 2012
- 47,181
- 96,820
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Chelsea FC, Victory, All Blecks,
Yep we can been found guilty twiceCan you prove his performances during that year were somehow enhanced?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Yep we can been found guilty twiceCan you prove his performances during that year were somehow enhanced?
Ben Johnson was the fastest man on earth at a certain Olympics as well , has he still got his gold? What about lance armstrong?But one might be able to determine who was the best player in 2012. Jobe still holds that title at the very least.
Once your body has been enhanced , it stays enhanced with minimal trainingMaybe your skills got better. I don't think you can take "whatever" and expect your kicking to be better without doing anything else.
Is there anything that Essendon its supporters and players don't bring into disrepute?
Is there an "on the juice" category at the Brownlow these days?But one might be able to determine who was the best player in 2012. Jobe still holds that title at the very least.
I don't think that's something that can be proven or disproven. I guess we'll just have to assume it's a big coincidence that he had a career best year the year he happened to be doping. Career high in disposals, goals, tackles, clearances, brownlow votes. Just happened to poll 90% of his votes in the first half of the season when the team was still doping.
Until his hamstring injury (six rounds own sidelines) in Round 8, 2011 Watson had superior disposal figures for the same period against the 2012 season. He had also polled 11 votes to round 7 in 2011 compared with 13 votes to the same time in 2012. His 2012 stats were hardly the massive outlier that you and others seem to make them, indeed they are a logical progression from the exposed form he showed in 2011 prior to his injury.
He should not retain his Brownlow however, I have no problem with that - just the general view (not necessarily yours) that he was a "crap, plodder" before Dank arrived - which he clearly was not.
Strong post to poster name irony hereItd be like taking the premiership medal off bob Murphy
That's not the point I was making at all, I clearly stated his 2012 Brownlow should be rescinded. I was, however, addressing the view proferred by quite a few to suggest he was a one-year wonder who only produced an exceptional 2012 because he was "doped to his eyeballs", which is pure fallacy.What is your point? What has any of the above got to do with him being found to have taken PEDs in the year of his Brownlow. He MIGHT have won it anyway if he hadn't but he did soooo?
If it was in the right direction he would have said "no" to the entire "supplements" program in the first place.If Jobe's moral compass was pointing in the right direction then he'd just give it back.
Balanced and measured post, and which is entirely valid.That's not the point I was making at all, I clearly stated his 2012 Brownlow should be rescinded. I was, however, addressing the view proferred by quite a few to suggest he was a one-year wonder who only produced an exceptional 2012 because he was "doped to his eyeballs", which is pure fallacy.
The AFL's anti-doping decision is irrelevant. A higher body found him guilty, a process the AFL signed and agreed to. The AFL also accepted the CAS decision.The Brownlow Medal is an AFL award. AFL's own anti-doping tribunal found him not guilty. He should keep it.
The obvious question after reading Gil's quotes is what other decisions does he feel are too difficult for him to make?
Why is the AFL paying someone around $2M/year if they find a decision like this "difficult"?
His case should be: "I polled the most votes out of all the players that weren't cheating".
That's all it should take.
I don't think the job of the peptides was to make the kicking more accurate.Once your body has been enhanced , it stays enhanced with minimal training
Headline:It's not the afl commissions decision, Cas applied the penalty all awrds to be stripped, are the going to break their own rules? There has been a n appeal by the afl and the players it has been thrown out, I guess they could appeal to the galactic senate ala Star Wars