Sorry Roby the footage does not show it was clearly touched
It does the tribunal confirmed it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Sorry Roby the footage does not show it was clearly touched
So from that footage it's clear Maynard doesn't touch ball with his hands .... could be that it barely brushes his tricep as there is a slight ripple effect .... though lets face it ... ultimately its an average attempt to smother and its more like the ball touched him
As for your Christian verdict ... looks like your on your lonesome there
I guess your tricep has never been falconed beforeThe old the ball touched Maynard, rather than Maynard touching the ball.
Even in this clip, it ends with Maynard's hands being outstretched. How does he go from that to knocking Brayshaw out with his shoulder. If he really wanted to minimize impact, he should've just put his hands out.I don't think the incident should've been cited. Maynard did nothing wrong. He jumped up and tried to attempt a smother, in which he touched the ball.
Here I had the footage the whole time:
View attachment 1802964
naive somewhat?Imagine calling someone out for something and doing the exact same thing in response, may as well have just responded with yes I am a flog
despite the experts at tribunal refuting every word you wrote here, you still persist .. 0.3 of a second, zero chance of making any decision, as detailed by the expert, it was purely instinctual, just an accident and if he had time to react , then WHY didnt Brayshaw veer left instead of further in to his path??Even in this clip, it ends with Maynard's hands being outstretched. How does he go from that to knocking Brayshaw out with his shoulder. If he really wanted to minimize impact, he should've just put his hands out.
Coupling this with the fact that Maynard is an aggressive player, seems obvious that his intent was to inflict some pain on Brayshaw. Not to knock him out, but to make him earn his kick.
Even in this clip, it ends with Maynard's hands being outstretched. How does he go from that to knocking Brayshaw out with his shoulder. If he really wanted to minimize impact, he should've just put his hands out.
Coupling this with the fact that Maynard is an aggressive player, seems obvious that his intent was to inflict some pain on Brayshaw. Not to knock him out, but to make him earn his kick.
despite the experts at tribunal refuting every word you wrote here, you still persist .. 0.3 of a second, zero chance of making any decision, as detailed by the expert, it was purely instinctual, just an accident and if he had time to react , then WHY didnt Brayshaw veer left instead of further in to his path??
What makes them experts? They saw exactly the same footage we saw.despite the experts at tribunal refuting every word you wrote here, you still persist .. 0.3 of a second, zero chance of making any decision, as detailed by the expert, it was purely instinctual, just an accident and if he had time to react , then WHY didnt Brayshaw veer left instead of further in to his path??
You look to be struggling for minenaive somewhat?
Was his brain turned off before he started moving his arms down? By the same token could we argue speed chess players are doing the impossible?despite the experts at tribunal refuting every word you wrote here, you still persist .. 0.3 of a second, zero chance of making any decision, as detailed by the expert, it was purely instinctual, just an accident and if he had time to react , then WHY didnt Brayshaw veer left instead of further in to his path??
No. But the fact that he was suspended meant that Maynard had to be suspended. Consistency is all we want.Did you agree on Mansell being suspended this year?
No. But the fact that he was suspended meant that Maynard had to be suspended. Consistency is all we want.
Was his brain turned off before he started moving his arms down? By the same token could we argue speed chess players are doing the impossible?
Yes he purposely touched the ball with a flabby square inch of his tricep and stopped the ball flying 40m downfieldSarcoidevo has lost all credibility. They said on multiple occasions, that Maynard never touched the ball, then I showed a video that Maynard did touch the ball. Just give them enough rope...
That doesn't make sense. Similar incidents in terms of reaction times/result, but different rulings. That's inconsistency.So if you're not happy that Mansell was suspended, then you shouldn't be happy Maynard getting suspended, consistency is all I want.
That doesn't make sense. Similar incidents in terms of reaction times/result, but different rulings. That's inconsistency.
Mate. Either both incidents get suspended or neither of them do.So you as poster can be inconsistent but the MRO cannot? You can't ask for consistency when you can't do it yourself.
Mate. Either both incidents get suspended or neither of them do.
i dunno why people get so angry about people who have zero impact on the actual game.Needs to go back to the commentary box and replace BT