Is it time?

Remove this Banner Ad

It's not a mess.
It was a coaching change.
It's that simple.
A coaching change.
Like every club, coaches come and coaches go.
Most coach changes actually don't work out. That's the business of football.
Nathan is the coach. Mick is the previous coach. Shaw the one before, Mathews the one before that. Etc.
It's not a mess, just business. (In my view.)

Most clubs don't change coaches of winning teams.
 
Doesn't really matter what I do. Ed put the succession plan in place and it has been a complete failure. Eventually he will have to accept responsibility.
I havent seen McGuire ever stop trying to further the cause of the club. And there is no one better that has presented to take over. So having your little tantrums about things that don't go the way you want them, are exercises in futility.
 
Most clubs don't change coaches of winning teams.
No they don't.
but regardless of all the circumstances, words, theories, at the end it's simple:

It was a coaching change.

Odds suggest that most coaching changes don't work. And that's where we are today. The rest can be discussed until the cows moo home.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

I havent seen McGuire ever stop trying to further the cause of the club. And there is no one better that has presented to take over. So having your little tantrums about things that don't go the way you want them, are exercises in futility.

Ed's been great for the club but the succession plan has failed. Nothing to do with tantrums, it's a fact. I hope like hell that we return to the finals next year but if we don't then Ed also should take responsibility.
 
Ed's been great for the club but the succession plan has failed. Nothing to do with tantrums, it's a fact. I hope like hell that we return to the finals next year but if we don't then Ed also should take responsibility.
It's not a failure until it's over. Whilst Buckley is still coach, it's a plan in progress.
 
16 years is long enough in any position. I agree with the OP. Time to give us an end date & perhaps groom a successor. Ed has done a great job financially & set us up for the future with facilities etc. but in the end it's just one flag in over 16 years while he has been President.
 
Put up some names that would do a better job than Ed...
I can't think of a better man for the job....still.

It's not about names, it's about the system. At Hawthorn they change presidents and it goes unnoticed, they just keep winning. At Collingwood it's all about Ed. We need to move beyond this messiah complex and become a club that is supported by a professional constitution.
 
16 years is long enough in any position. I agree with the OP. Time to give us an end date & perhaps groom a successor. Ed has done a great job financially & set us up for the future with facilities etc. but in the end it's just one flag in over 16 years while he has been President.

The richmond,melbourne and doggies presidents must be really ****ed then.
 
What are the alternatives, I think it will require someone to challenge for the role with a plan and an ability to win over the masses. I don't think he is going anywhere just yet, a bad year next year may see some cracks appear. Big year 2017 imho
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Ed has the best interests of our club at heart and makes decisions that he (and the board) think will benefit us and usually they do. We are now financially strong and have enjoyed reasonable success (made finals in 10 of 16 years including the flag and 4 GF appearances). The last 3 years have been disappointing however the future looks bright and we'll never know what might have happened if Malthouse had stayed on and kept the 2010/11 team together; it might have been better, might have been worse.

With Ed's passion and commitment there is no doubt he won't stay on if he thinks he's no longer the best person for the job. Personally, I think the next 5 years are going to be very good for us and Bucks and Ed will continue working together but if not, Ed will know when to go.
 
We are the biggest club in the country with the largest supporter base, trust me there are some very successful businesses types out there who support us. Just because we don't know them does not mean they are not right for the job. I'm confident when the time comes and Ed steps down we will get a well connected smart operator as our next President
 
Eddie must never leave. The greatest president of the collingwood football club. A true powerhouse. He has even delivered a premiership which has been rare since 1958. Should go when he decides. Will stay on until he is 75.

KOLOKOTRONIS
Spot on. Our fans haven't got a clue. We wanted Malthouse sacked and look where that got us now we are still not happy we want to destroy the club in to the ground .
 
We are the biggest club in the country with the largest supporter base, trust me there are some very successful businesses types out there who support us. Just because we don't know them does not mean they are not right for the job. I'm confident when the time comes and Ed steps down we will get a well connected smart operator as our next President
No.
Because without Eddie there would be no Collingwood as we know it now. I'm not just talking about him salvaging our financial position before he took over and largely debt proofing us since... but there would have been no mick malthouse era at the club, no Holden centre and Olympic park redevelopment, nowhere near 70,000 + members every year, no netball and women's team to further grow the club, no 4 grandfinals, no premiership. Eddie (with the help and input of many) has his fingerprints over all of that. The man has vision, acumen, contacts, influence and dedication.

And yet supporters forget all that because we don't play finals for three years and have bottomed out to 12th in the league of 18 teams! 11 of the last 15 flags have been won by only 4 teams (lions,cats,hawks,swans)... there are a lot of clubs not winning flags in recent times, not just ours.... and yet we won one only 6 years ago

Eddie is still able to president Collingwood and therefore still should be. He will know when it's time to move on.

Name me anyone who could do a better job than him right now?
Spot on mate.
 
Other than that group who make some noise online about challenging him, but never do anything about it in real life, is there anyone else stepping up - and more importantly, anyone who can actually do the job?

I do think that Eddies time is approaching its end - however we're not there yet.
If we continue to decline over the next year or two then he should, and hopefully will, step down.

If we continue to improve and win a flag between now and the end of the decade, then I would absolutely love him to be able to step down with us on top.
 
Most clubs don't change coaches of winning teams.
The only issue with this is that the agreement was reached before 2010, we hadn't won a premiership since 1990 all parties were in agreement. The only person not to honor their side of the agreement was the then coach MM. MM was supposed to be there to oversee football operations, he didn't.
 
I am not personally looking forward to the day that Ed steps down and I'm pretty sure I won't be until or unless someone comes along to challenge who can show the members clearly how he can do a better job. I'm certainly not in favour of Eddie grooming anyone for the role because I don't believe that it's his job nor his choice. Such things are a choice for the members and I believe it's necessary for the role to be fought for, not passed on to some anointee.

As far as taking responsibility for the succession plan goes I reckon he has shown by his actions that he will do what it takes to get things right. I'm pretty sure that he recognises that the plan was put in place on his watch and that it failed spectacularly but such things happen when dealing with personalities and egos. There's only a certain extent to which Ed and the board can be held accountable for the dishonesty and/or lack of integrity of past employees.

At this stage I see no reason for Ed to nominate an end date and I wouldn't want him to anoint a successor. When I can clearly see a better option for the club then I might be inclined to accept that it may be time. Until then, Eddie has my full support and from what I can see, the full support of the majority of the members.

It's a NO from me!
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Is it time?

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top