Is Richmond or Essendon, Melbourne currently the worst team in the AFL?

raskolnikov · Apr 17, 2006

tigerboyz said:
Definately the bummers and i'm looking forward to them getting pumped anzac day.

Make sure you have a box of tissues ready.

cs61 · Apr 17, 2006

I think Richmond would have to be. Melbourne have looked ok at times, but didn't do well against Carlton.

Essendon have looked competitive in all their games, but losing Llyod now hurts them, especially since they have 4 winable games coming up.

But at the moment you'd have to say Richmond, who are going to struggle more with Gaspar carrying something. Their defence is their major problem.

Croat tiger · Apr 17, 2006

Raskolnikov said:
Make sure you have a box of tissues ready.

Don't worry i'll buy them for you.

Mcchawk · Apr 17, 2006

Higgs Boson said:
Bookmarked for Round 9, McTwat.

Win a game fair weather supporter

Hawkk · Apr 17, 2006

Eagle87 said:
I reckon Richmond arent that good BUT we need to remember that they have so far played the Bulldogs (1st), St Kilda (5th) and West Coast (2nd). I mean how many wins would Carlton, Brisbane, Essendon, Port, Collingwood or Hawthorn have had against those 3 sides if they had the same draw the Tigers have had???

Hawthorn played Geelong in Geelong, Rocca and Fremantle in Tassie.

With the exception of one poor half last week they have dominated all 3 contests!

Eagle87 · Apr 17, 2006

Hawkk said:
Hawthorn played Geelong in Geelong, Rocca and Fremantle in Tassie.

With the exception of one poor half last week they have dominated all 3 contests!

So if you had played the Doggies at the Dome in round 1, the Saints at the Dome in Rd 2 and the Eagles at Subi in Rd 3, what do you reckon your record would be?

Terry Tan · Apr 17, 2006

Eagle87 said:
So if you had played the Doggies at the Dome in round 1, the Saints at the Dome in Rd 2 and the Eagles at Subi in Rd 3, what do you reckon your record would be?

their record would be 0-3 and they'd be on the bottom. Having said that, good luck to them it's good to see them on the rise.

Mcchawk · Apr 17, 2006

Terry Tan said:
their record would be 0-3 and they'd be on the bottom.

BS we ain't Richmond. I'd say 1-2 or 2-1

Eagle87 · Apr 17, 2006

Mcchawk said:
BS we ain't Richmond. I'd say 1-2 or 2-1

Ok, so you are better than which of these 3 teams?

Since you would have beaten either 1 or 2 of them, I am interested in who?

Punt_Road_Roar · Apr 17, 2006

Eagle87 said:
Ok, so you are better than which of these 3 teams?

Since you would have beaten either 1 or 2 of them, I am interested in who?

Take it easy Eagle87 you might make him cry

Mcchawk · Apr 17, 2006

Eagle87 said:
Ok, so you are better than which of these 3 teams?

Since you would have beaten either 1 or 2 of them, I am interested in who?

Take your pick, none of them aren't unbeatable in my eyes, football isn't like years ago when Hawthorn dominated and we were unbeatable. The competition is is now fair because of the draft

Mcchawk · Apr 17, 2006

Punt_Road_Roar said:
Take it easy Eagle87 you might make him cry

Coming from someone on the bottom, who's crying loser?

Punt_Road_Roar · Apr 17, 2006

Mcchawk said:
Take your pick, none of them aren't beatbale in my eyes, football isn't like years ago when Hawthorn dominated and we were unbeatable. The competition is is now fair because of the draft

So name one team then, and if they are all beatable then are you saying you would be clearly 3 - 0 ?

LMAO

Punt_Road_Roar · Apr 17, 2006

Mcchawk said:
Coming from someone on the bottom, who's crying loser?

come on tough guy name the one side out of those 3 you would have beaten?

You still havent done it, I wonder why?

Mcchawk · Apr 17, 2006

Punt_Road_Roar said:
come on tough guy name the one side out of those 3 you would have beaten?

You still havent done it, I wonder why?

Dip ******** I named all three as being beatable, you Richmond supporters are bloody ****************s

Punt_Road_Roar · Apr 17, 2006

Mcchawk said:
Dip ******** I named all three as being beatable, you Richmond supporters are bloody ****************s

No you didnt, you named no one, you are evading the question.

Would have you beaten the Doggies in round 1? Yes or No ?

Would have you beaten St Kilda in Round 2 at the Dome? Yes or No?

Would have you beaten the Eagles at Subi in Round 3? Yes or No ?

Beatable is not even the same as beaten drop kick

Mcchawk · Apr 17, 2006

Punt_Road_Roar said:
No you didnt, you named no one, you are evading the question.

Would have you beaten the Doggies in round 1? Yes or No ?

Would have you beaten St Kilda in Round 2 at the Dome? Yes or No?

Would have you beaten the Eagles at Subi in Round 3? Yes or No ?

Beatable is not even the same as beaten drop kick

Listen you stupid ********ing ********.

We could beat Footscray, St Kilda, Eagles yes on our day

M29 · Apr 17, 2006

First of all it should be "Are richmond, Essendon or Melbourne currently the worst team in the AFL?"

After 3 rounds? We haven't been a ******** as we were last year. You lot are jumping the gun abit. Did you even watch yesterdays game? Last weeks performance was typical interstate rubbish, so nothings changed in that regard. But at least our younger players appear to be stepping up.

Eagle87 · Apr 17, 2006

Mcchawk said:
Take your pick, none of them aren't unbeatable in my eyes, football isn't like years ago when Hawthorn dominated and we were unbeatable. The competition is is now fair because of the draft

In generic terms, I agree that the competition is "equal" and no side is unbeatable etc etc

However, I believe the Bullies in round 1, St Kilda in rd 2 and Eagles in rd 3 were all beyond the capabilities of your team. I await with interest your reasons why the Hawks would have won as many as 2 of those games....

M29 · Apr 17, 2006

Mcchawk said:
Listen you stupid ********ing ********.

We could beat Footscray, St Kilda, Eagles yes on our day

You still have to beat us twice in a year for us to take you lot seriously.

It's like brisbane or port with us. It's a bye round.

Punt_Road_Roar · Apr 17, 2006

Mcchawk said:
Listen you stupid ********ing ********.

We could beat Footscray, St Kilda, Eagles yes on our day

LMAO your funny !!!

are you always the class clown?

So what your saying is you wouldnt have been 1-2 or 2 -1 you would really be 3-0 if you played those 3 teams on your day?

Terry Tan · Apr 17, 2006

Mcchawk said:
Listen you stupid ********ing ********.

We could beat Footscray, St Kilda, Eagles yes on our day

I can see you've been reading one of Jeff Kennett's finest political books - "How to give indirect answers to direct questions".

Mcchawk · Apr 17, 2006

Punt_Road_Roar said:
LMAO your funny !!!

are you always the class clown?

So what your saying is you wouldnt have been 1-2 or 2 -1 you would really be 3-0 if you played those 3 teams on your day?

Hawthorn for along time now have ALWAYS been a class ABOVE Richmond get use to it

Punt_Road_Roar · Apr 17, 2006

Terry Tan said:
I can see you've been reading one of Jeff Kennett's finest political books - "How to give indirect answers to direct questions".

More like the "I'm a dumb prik who thought I'd troll only to see my thread backfire"

melbournemartin · Apr 17, 2006

Melbourne have more potential in their list than Essendon and definatly Richmond. Just aint showing it enough atm but yesterday was definately an improvment

WBBL Season 10 - Oct '24 to Dec '25

Is Richmond or Essendon, Melbourne currently the worst team in the AFL?

Hall of Famer

Norm Smith Medallist

Cancelled

Norm Smith Medallist

Hall of Famer

Brownlow Medallist

Club Legend

Norm Smith Medallist

Brownlow Medallist

Norm Smith Medallist

Norm Smith Medallist

Norm Smith Medallist

Norm Smith Medallist

Norm Smith Medallist

Norm Smith Medallist

Norm Smith Medallist

Norm Smith Medallist

Brownlow Medallist

Brownlow Medallist

Brownlow Medallist

Norm Smith Medallist

Club Legend

Norm Smith Medallist

Norm Smith Medallist

Brownlow Medallist

Is Richmond or Essendon, Melbourne currently the worst team in the AFL?

Similar threads

Log In or Create New Account