Opinion Is the Showdown the Biggest Rivalry?

Remove this Banner Ad

1) Adelaide is a fish bowl and very inward focused
2) it's culture is very insecure and as a result feels the need to prove something
3) The Crows were created not because of wanting AFL representation rather out of spite to stop Port joining the AFL. As a result the Crows never forgave Port for their audacity and has fueled an immense rivalry.

I just wish the showdowns were Port vs Norwood (being granted an AFL licence) rather than the Crows. The other 8 teams that made up the Crows were quite pathetic.
Absolute balderdash. Players from the other 'pathetic' SANFL clubs made up quite a few of Port's better players and still do...Wingard a prime example. If only those pathetic teams were providing players to the Crows only right now!
 

Log in to remove this ad.

1) Adelaide is a fish bowl and very inward focused
2) it's culture is very insecure and as a result feels the need to prove something
3) The Crows were created not because of wanting AFL representation rather out of spite to stop Port joining the AFL. As a result the Crows never forgave Port for their audacity and has fueled an immense rivalry.

I just wish the showdowns were Port vs Norwood (being granted an AFL licence) rather than the Crows. The other 8 teams that made up the Crows were quite pathetic.

Are you 8 years old, or just lacking a brain?
This is the biggest load of tripe ive seen in ages.
 
Are you 8 years old, or just lacking a brain?
This is the biggest load of tripe ive seen in ages.

Go on the Port board these kinds of statements are everywhere...still trying to get over the one from yesterday by a Port fan who said Dangerfield is a seagull who only does the pretty things after someone gives him the ball....he then backed the argument up with statistics showing Dangerfield has more contested possessions and clearances than any other Port player.....lol....with logic like that what can you do?
 
Easily done but that will involve cooperation by the two clubs.

Something that rarely occurs due to the hostile relationship.

For the fans, you could alternate bays for each showdown, e.g...

Bays
1,2,3,4, etc...
A,P,A,P - First Showdown
P,A,P,A - Second Showdown

Seats unoccupied in each bay can be offered to other members of the relevant club.

All unsold seats are open to the general public.

Club corporates and functions would still tie in to the home team at the time.
Also, give members ability to buy away showdown as part of annual membership package.
 
1) Adelaide is a fish bowl and very inward focused
2) it's culture is very insecure and as a result feels the need to prove something
3) The Crows were created not because of wanting AFL representation rather out of spite to stop Port joining the AFL. As a result the Crows never forgave Port for their audacity and has fueled an immense rivalry.

I just wish the showdowns were Port vs Norwood (being granted an AFL licence) rather than the Crows. The other 8 teams that made up the Crows were quite pathetic.
Took the loss well I see & still bitter AFC came into the AFL before Port.

These type of posts give your supporters a bad name.
 
Derby wise around Australia, the Showdown is best however I think in years to come the A-League Sydney and Melbourne derbies will over take in terms of atmosphere and hate as the rivalry and history grows as these derbies are still in there early days.
 
Derby wise around Australia, the Showdown is best however I think in years to come the A-League Sydney and Melbourne derbies will over take in terms of atmosphere and hate as the rivalry and history grows as these derbies are still in there early days.

Wogs dont count.
 
Absolute balderdash. Players from the other 'pathetic' SANFL clubs made up quite a few of Port's better players and still do...Wingard a prime example. If only those pathetic teams were providing players to the Crows only right now!

the operative words were back then.

1) back then, there was Port, Norwood and 8 other pathetic sides including woodville
1.5) It could be argued Sturt was not pathetic, so I would grant that as a possible exception
2) Now, the whole SANFL is a development league but in being that it ruins the achievements of great SA footballers pre mid 90s
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Are you 8 years old, or just lacking a brain?
This is the biggest load of tripe ive seen in ages.

how old were you when PAFC first submitted a proposal to join the AFL? did you even go to an SANFL game pre the cows?

lol

I dare say youtube would be your only knowledge of SANFL pre the cows.
 
Took the loss well I see & still bitter AFC came into the AFL before Port.

These type of posts give your supporters a bad name.

so what is your memory of the reason why adelaide was formed?

a well organised plan and desire to have AFL representation or one of desperation to block Port's submission?
 
Go on the Port board these kinds of statements are everywhere...still trying to get over the one from yesterday by a Port fan who said Dangerfield is a seagull who only does the pretty things after someone gives him the ball....he then backed the argument up with statistics showing Dangerfield has more contested possessions and clearances than any other Port player.....lol....with logic like that what can you do?

Of course, you and other supporters of the corporation, never sledge Port players do you? Never ever.
 
they say a picture says a thousand words

upload_2014-7-2_13-24-36.jpeg

lol, the cows don't even know who they are


then again, when you have no history you have no identity

562790-b8e2a514-2dc0-11e3-9e23-6fef8332cdf9.jpg
 
Back to back flags and reigning premier....sounds pretty relevant to me. Typically stupid comment from a Port supporter.

in what is now a second, third or fourth tier league

I would be impressed if I was 12yo




That said Norwood were the hardest done by, by the formation of the cows. They were a great club and have had their rightful spot in the AFL usurped by the cows.

The SANFL have been a hindrance to Port, Norwood and football in general in SA. It makes me laugh to think glenelg and woodville have effective equal representation as norwood under the cows. Explain to me how that is not pathetic and not unjust to norwood?
 
Last edited:
Took the loss well I see & still bitter AFC came into the AFL before Port.

These type of posts give your supporters a bad name.

What part of my comment was not fact. was it point 3) that resonated?
 
What part of my comment was not fact. was it point 3) that resonated?
You are not worthy of me wasting any more time on as you are a small minded individual.

Have fun with the other crows supporters you are trolling...
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Opinion Is the Showdown the Biggest Rivalry?

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top