Opinion Is there a God? Atheists, agnostics and believers please slug it out here.

Remove this Banner Ad

I don't. But there is a lot of anecdotal evidence of spirits, what do they consist of?

Gin - junpier berries
Tequila - agave
Scotch whiskey - barley
Bourbon whiskey - corn
Rum - sugarcane

to name a few
 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this ad.

You on the one hand discount things that you cannot comprehend or understand yet the entire universe no one yet comprehends or understands it's scope or size or what it consists of beyond a couple of light years so the very thing in which you exist in you or anybody cannot possibly comprehend, yet you banish the possibility of the existence of God totally... how's that for logic.

Yes and I accept that the world is enormous and hard to comprehend. There are domains of knowledge which we do not quite a bit about, such as optics, constitutional law, grammar, mechanics, propulsion and so on. That's not to say that some larger laws we don't yet understand may make the sun rise in the west tomorrow for instance, or that we discover a species of flying dog that has been hiding deep in the Amazon. But from that admission, I say the obvious thing which is that I don't know everything and in fact that it's impossible to know all because human beings are finite creatures inhabiting a vast and infinite universe.

I don't then attribute things I don't understand in the cosmos to some entity that I don't even know exists as a material or spiritual entity. I think it's clear when you just create a subset for things we don't know and dump it in that folder which you label God you get the problems raised above. Quite aside from material or sensory proof is the moral crises they open which for Christians is also a logical problem. If God is everywhere is he everything? If God is omnipotent why does he allow evil? If God is all things is he all bad things as well as good?
 
Last edited:
Yes and I accept that the world is enormous and hard to comprehend. There are domains of knowledge which we do not quite a bit about, such as optics, constitutional law, grammar, mechanics, propulsion and so on. That's not to say that some larger laws we don't yet understand may make the sun rise in the west tomorrow for instance, or that we discover a species of flying dog that has been hiding deep in the Amazon. But from that admission, I say the obvious thing which is that I don't know everything and in fact that it's impossible to know all because human beings are finite creatures inhabiting a vast and infinite universe.

I don't then attribute things I don't understand in the cosmos to some entity that I don't even know exists as a material or spiritual entity. I think it's clear when you just create a subset for things we don't know and dump it in that folder which you label God you get the problems raised above. Quite aside from material or sensory proof is the logical crises they open. If God is everywhere is he everything? If God is omnipotent why does he allow evil? If God is all things is he all bad things as well as good?

Well maybe one day you can ask him all this..
 
At the heart of the contradiction about God is the impossibility of omnipotence as a concept. A thing (here God) can't be everywhere - unless of course we just bundle everything physical up and say that a thing (God) is everything. That is a formulation full of problems. It has an impressive quantitative appeal but the quality, I'm not so sure. It gives all sorts of organic and non living objects indistinguishable agency. Holy mops and partially omnipotent Jive Bunnies.

If omnipotence is about some immaterial 'spirit' then is God a unicorn in a movie for instance?

Only if a cat is riding said unicorn.
 
This is a very clear, short (20 minutes) and awesome philosophical talk about the problem with the 'totalising world view' prevalent in some religions and scientific theory.

http://mpegmedia.abc.net.au/rn/podcast/2015/11/pze_20151122.mp3

It's based on a book called "The World Does Not Exist' which is not suggesting there is no physical or mental world but rather that there is no singular explanatory theory for the world which can work. A block universe might attempt to deal with space and time but can't explain Angela Merkel's nipples, bagel making or the establishment of micronations or sexual fetishes. There are rather domains of knowledge, not some ultimate backdrop that you reach. One domain can lead to another, but no ultimate domain.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

You must be the Supreme Being then.... Congrats.
Thanks, could you please donate 10% of your wage weekly to me. It's not cheap being god.

Oh & I prefer Mexicana over Supreme.
 
Can someone please get me up to speed on why God must be omnipresent and omnipotent?

Maybe it's great at creating universes but not so flash at keeping them running without plague or famine. Maybe it's megapowerful but has strengths/weaknesses relative to Satan that explain why Satan has never been permanently destroyed.

It seems that a lot of the mysteries around God would be partly dismantled by God being less than all-powerful, all-seeing, all-knowing etc. And in the same breath that people trot out these ideas as facts, they admit that God is beyond our comprehension.
 
Can someone please get me up to speed on why God must be omnipresent and omnipotent?

Maybe it's great at creating universes but not so flash at keeping them running without plague or famine. Maybe it's megapowerful but has strengths/weaknesses relative to Satan that explain why Satan has never been permanently destroyed.

It seems that a lot of the mysteries around God would be partly dismantled by God being less than all-powerful, all-seeing, all-knowing etc. And in the same breath that people trot out these ideas as facts, they admit that God is beyond our comprehension.

The ancient, polytheistic Gods were capricious and spiteful Gods. Flawed and with limited powers and interests which were divided up among them, kind of like superheroes. Yahweh, who later also became known as the Christian God, was himself at one point only one amongst many Gods in ancient Israel, such as Chermosh, Molech and two Golden Calves. In fact when Ezra returned from Babylon after the Judeans were released by Cyrus the Persian, he found much idolatry and worshipping of other Gods amongst the population.

This precipitated a bit of a religious pogrom from the returning Judean ruling class who had been impressed by their brief introduction to the galvanising effects of Persian monotheism, and so Yahweh became the one and only God after much slashing of agricultural throats and burning of 'false idols'. Following this monotheistic purge comes all the attendant 'spiritual', i.e. philosophical and logical problems associated with the idea of one, omnipotent God.
 
Last edited:

Remove this Banner Ad

Opinion Is there a God? Atheists, agnostics and believers please slug it out here.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top