- Banned
- #26
You tell em Clay Davis!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Brisbane Lions - 2:30PM AEST Sat
Squiggle tips Lions at 61% chance -- What's your tip? -- Ticketing Buy, Sell -- Teams on Thurs »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Grand Final
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Like I said, if there was no malice or racism intended (and I imagine their wasn't, its a New York newspaper, hardly a hotbed for blatant racism) then it is simply really, really, insensitive and shows a lack of foresight.
People get killedSo there should be strictly no cartoons depicting the prophet Muhammad, as this will inevitably lead to offense from the Islamic community?
So there should be strictly no cartoons depicting the prophet Muhammad, as this will inevitably lead to offense from the Islamic community?
Theo Van Gogh was murdered for exposing the truth.Look at what happened to that Dutch film maker when he rightfully pointed out that Islam encourages domestic violence and a subservient relationship between wife and husband.
Theo Van Gogh was murdered for exposing the truth.
Should the truth be covered up?
Silenced by terrorism?
Clearly this cartoon is trying to suggest that those who wrote the stimulus bill are monkeys. As in 'Pay peanuts, get monkeys'.
It would be a whole new thread.Its an interesting point isn't it.
It would be a whole new thread.
That would soon be full of the usual dhimmi's and apologists screaming racist and bigot to derail discussion asap
for those of you who haven't seen the cartoon.
anybody who immediately screams 'racist' is, at best, a fool.
racism
:ddefinitely racism.
Lefties favour free speach if they agree with it hence Louis Farrahkan can visit Australia but a leader of the BNP cannot.Only difference between these two isI don't think so. A lot of real lefty's would argue in favour of free speech.
the fact is, by any qualitative assessment, Van Gogh's movie was accurate and a worthy work of art. He didn't make the movie out of malice at all.
You can't handle the truth.What is truth?
Like I said, if there was no malice or racism intended (and I imagine their wasn't, its a New York newspaper, hardly a hotbed for blatant racism) then it is simply really, really, insensitive and shows a lack of foresight.
Agreed although I wouldn't rule out racism cloked by a current event.
Looks like a veiled attack on Obama to me but as you say it's NY. If it were Alabama it would be different.
Lefties favour free speach if they agree with it
"It was the best of times, it was the blurst of times"
Yep.
Al Sharpton is "sheeeeet..."
And if that attack was on GW Bush no one would have raised a rats eyelid.
Fantastic we have a colored US President
But if you are prepared to step up to the batting plate (the presidency)
Then be prepared to be hit by the occasional ball from the pitcher.
If colored leaders are going to be precious about criticism, maybe it was not their time to run for the presidency.
Because it would have nothing to do with his race.
Urgh. More racism.